On 10/04/2014 07:19 PM Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Many curse AMD video chips (for laptop) in this thread. Are these only
"shared memory" chips that people have reason not to like? Or real
"discrete" AMD (former ATI) chips are bad on laptops as well? If there are
any. (Are there any with their own dedi
On 10/5/2014 12:48 AM, ken wrote:
I sincerely *hope* that it isn't some kind of trend that video cards
are using shared memory instead of dedicated memory on the card
itself. All machines I've bought or built since the late '90s have
had video cards with a .5G of dedicated memory. This is
On 10/05/2014 04:02 AM John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/5/2014 12:48 AM, ken wrote:
I sincerely *hope* that it isn't some kind of trend that video cards
are using shared memory instead of dedicated memory on the card
itself. All machines I've bought or built since the late '90s have
had video cards
On 10/5/2014 1:58 AM, ken wrote:
Perhaps you're intimately familiar with each and every video card
manufactured since the early '80s except for the ones I bought with my
machines, because I've always insisted on video cards with static RAM.
Or perhaps your understanding of static RAM is differe
On 10/05/2014 04:58 AM ken wrote:
On 10/05/2014 04:02 AM John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/5/2014 12:48 AM, ken wrote:
I sincerely *hope* that it isn't some kind of trend that video cards
are using shared memory instead of dedicated memory on the card
itself. All machines I've bought or built sin
... Ken, please provide links to prove your claims that SRAM is still being
used as opposed to asking for links for the opposition. I see no proof that
SRAM is still used at all except for in Xbox One and CPU's L3 cache, etc. I
also see that its much more expensive and when I attempt to find a l
On Sun, October 5, 2014 3:02 am, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/5/2014 12:48 AM, ken wrote:
>>
>> I sincerely *hope* that it isn't some kind of trend that video cards
>> are using shared memory instead of dedicated memory on the card
>> itself. All machines I've bought or built since the late '90s
On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 12:51 +0100, Dennis Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, lee wrote:
>
> > Is the Subject: header required by some RFC? If it is, I'll also
> > deny messages that don't have one.
> Not as far as I'm aware. RFC5322, "Internet Message Format",
> contains:
>
>The only req
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2014 03:11 PM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote:
>
>> Thanks to everyone who responded. This led to some interesting reading
>> and learning, but it hasn’t avoided the reboot.
>>
>> I found this page on udev:
>> How to reload udev rule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Mark,
You can use "ip" tools to do the trick.
For Ubuntu I wrote this upstart script that helps with it without
touching udev.
You can see it here:
http://www1.ngtech.co.il/paste/1175/
You can run this function at runtime and it will change the i
On Sun, October 5, 2014 4:57 am, ken wrote:
>
>
> On 10/05/2014 04:58 AM ken wrote:
>> On 10/05/2014 04:02 AM John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 10/5/2014 12:48 AM, ken wrote:
I sincerely *hope* that it isn't some kind of trend that video cards
are using shared memory instead of dedicated
On Sun, October 5, 2014 6:34 am, jwyeth.a...@gmail.com wrote:
> ... Ken, please provide links to prove your claims that SRAM is still
> being used as opposed to asking for links for the opposition. I see no
> proof that SRAM is still used at all except for in Xbox One and CPU's L3
> cache, etc. I
hi all,
I've inherited a CentOS 6.4 machine that runs VMWare Workstation 9 which
in turn hosts a Windows SBS 2011 guest.
the problem is that the Windows guest keeps crashing, and I have no idea
why. it was working fine for a while but recently started crashing
after a day or two of operation.
a
On 10/5/2014 6:17 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
John, I would respectfully disagree. The bad thing about "shared" memory
video cards is fundamental in the architecture. They use as video RAM a
portion of main RAM, that means they place the video traffic (30, or 60,
50 25 frames per second multiplied
Hi all,
I used a kickstart script to setup a new machine of mine with RAID 1
(I couldn't get anaconda to create matching partition schemes). So I've
now got /dev/sdg1 and /dev/sdh1 as 'bios_grub' (/dev/sd{a-f} are a
separate array).
0 root@an-nas02:~# parted /dev/sdg print free
Model: AT
On 05/10/14 02:37 PM, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
I used a kickstart script to setup a new machine of mine with RAID 1
(I couldn't get anaconda to create matching partition schemes). So I've
now got /dev/sdg1 and /dev/sdh1 as 'bios_grub' (/dev/sd{a-f} are a
separate array).
0 root@an-nas02:~#
This is a follow-up to my thread on only being able to boot off of one
disk when CentOS 7 is installed on software RAID level 1 disks.
I had two problems; Anaconda wouldn't allow a biosboot partition on both
disks, so the partition geometry didn't match the two disks. When I
dropped to shell t
I really don't get it. Why get into so much fuss just to rename your
interfaces
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Eliezer Croitoru
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey Mark,
>
> You can use "ip" tools to do the trick.
> For Ubuntu I wrote this upstart script that he
On 2014-10-04, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 18:34:14 -0400
> Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
>> The best way to achieve your end is to delete the unused desktop
>> installations from your machine. Software not installed is the best
>> defence against attack directed at that software
>
> I agree,
To answer this question using my use-case;
I build HA clusters, and I want to make sure that physical port X on all
nodes have the same device name. Biosdevname tries to address this, but
doesn't work all the time.
Further, in my case, I've got a minimum of six interfaces in each node,
paire
Hello
I am unable create a new logical volume, I receive the following error
when using lvcreate
# lvcreate -L 1g -n system3_root hm
device-mapper: resume ioctl on failed: Invalid argument
Unable to resume hm-system3_root (253:7)
Failed to activate new LV.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:17:45 + (UTC)
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> You could find out what packages the .desktop files belong to (when they
> are back in their original location):
>
> rpm -qf /usr/share/xsessions/gnome*
>
> Then remove the corresponding package(s) using yum. Obviously, check fo
Hey Y'all,
I've been Googeling and experimenting for two days trying to find a way
to deal with the Intel 845-G video chipset in this Dell Dimension 2400.
First, it doesn't have a DVD drive so I have to install from a CD.
When I try to boot into the Live CD I get a video error something like,
Und
On 10/5/2014 7:47 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
I've been Googeling and experimenting for two days trying to find a way
to deal with the Intel 845-G video chipset in this Dell Dimension 2400.
thats a Pentium 4 chipset from 2002, with 2nd generation intel embedded
graphics ?thats some seriously
24 matches
Mail list logo
