On 10/3/14, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Geez! I bet he didn't think that he'd have to add
>> around that I've lost track of who posted that, but *I* thought it
>> was
>> funny
>
> Why send a smartass reply to a simple query?
I'd admit to a certain level of persona
Am 04.10.2014 um 03:34 schrieb Tim Dunphy:
Hey all,
I noticed that my puppet server running CentOS 6.5 was acting a little
pokey.
So I logged in and did what well just about anyone would've done. And ran
the uptime command to have a look at the load. And it was astonishingly
high!
[root@p
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> Today I found myself in need of a laptop to run Centos on. And that simple
> statement led to an all-day odyssey.
>
> My original plan was to purchase a laptop and install Centos 6 on it. I went
> to Staples and tried booting it on every mo
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 12:56 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > Today I found myself in need of a laptop to run Centos on. And that simple
> > statement led to an all-day odyssey.
> My intention is to run CentOS 6.x and VM Windows and any other O
On 10/4/14, Phil Wyett wrote:
> My intention is to run CentOS 6.x and VM Windows and any other OS etc.
> After discarding many options I seem to have settled with an eye on a HP
> ProBook 455 G2.
>
> http://store.hp.com/UKStore/Merch/Product.aspx?id=G6W43EA&opt=ABU&sel=PBNB
>
> This system has le
On 10/04/2014 02:07 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I'd admit to a certain level of personal bias and snappish mood when I
wrote that reply, due in part to the fact the OP's name and style
comes across as similar to somebody I had to deal with earlier,
although I still lean, perhaps unfairly, that
I have installed CentOS 7.
I added "biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0" at install time.
I still have a network name of en01 and not eth0.
How do I get eth0 when viewing ifconfig?
dmesg | grep eth0
show its being detected, and being renamed.
systemd-udev renaming eth0 to en01...
I then looked in /etc/
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 10:33:55AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have installed CentOS 7.
> I added "biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0" at install time.
>
What I've done on Fedora for awhile now.
I don't use NetworkManager, so if you are using it, I don't know, it does
its own thing to network names.
yeah it does..
[root@puppet:~] #ps faux | grep smarvtd
root 18194 0.0 0.0 103244 836 pts/2S+ 11:05 0:00 |
\_ grep smarvtd
root 28855 0.0 0.1 433824 1688 ?Ssl Oct03 0:15
/tmp/smarvtd
root 5923 0.0 0.1 433824 1684 ?Ssl Oct03 0:12
/tmp/smarvtd
roo
Since this was your puppet server, you might also want to check to see if the
intrusion has spread to your other machines, it's possible the attacker didn't
notice or that the attack was fully automated, but you should read through the
puppet configs and see if there are any commands being distr
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 10:33:55AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> > I have installed CentOS 7.
> > I added "biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0" at install time.
> >
>
> What I've done on Fedora for awhile now.
>
> I don't use NetworkManager, so if you
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:22 AM, SilverTip257
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 10:33:55AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
>> > I have installed CentOS 7.
>> > I added "biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0" at install time.
>> >
>>
>> What I've done on F
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:22:38AM -0400, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> >
> > What I've done on Fedora for awhile now.
> >
> >
> > rpm -e biosdevname (This should soon not be necessary, at least in Fedora)
> > Then in /etc/default edit grub and a
>
> Since this was your puppet server, you might also want to check to see if
> the intrusion has spread to your other machines, it's possible the attacker
> didn't notice or that the attack was fully automated, but you should read
> through the puppet configs and see if there are any commands bein
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 14:58 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 12:56 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> > > Today I found myself in need of a laptop to run Centos on. And that
> > > simple statement led to an all-day odyssey.
>
Hi All :)
I am currently involved in a project in which there is a SAN array (Sun
Storagetek 2540) which exports LUNs for some servers with Centos 5.2 x86. I
will be performing a migration to Centos 5.9 x86_64 in some time and am
gathering needed info now :)
I am trying to find the place in the O
The answer is: I was told to do so :) Corpo related stuff ;)
R.
2014-10-04 18:25 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
> Am 04.10.2014 um 18:22 schrieb Rafał Radecki:
>
>> As I said I need to perform migration of the OS to Centos 5.9 x86_64 and
>> am
>> curious where from does the mapping
>>
>> scsi devic
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:22 schrieb Rafał Radecki:
[ ... ]
In sysfs in /sys/bus/scsi/devices/7:0:0:8 I found:
# ll block\:sdj
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 4 17:57 block:sdj ->
../../../../../../../../../../block/sdj
Where else can I look for the LUN<->/dev/ device mapping rules? How are the
LUNs
Thanks Alexander, these links make the topic VERY clear :)
Have a nice day :)
BR,
Rafal.
2014-10-04 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alexander Dalloz :
> Am 04.10.2014 um 18:22 schrieb Rafał Radecki:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> In sysfs in /sys/bus/scsi/devices/7:0:0:8 I found:
>>
>> # ll block\:sdj
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root ro
On 10/04/2014 12:22 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi All :)
I am currently involved in a project in which there is a SAN array (Sun
Storagetek 2540) which exports LUNs for some servers with Centos 5.2 x86. I
will be performing a migration to Centos 5.9 x86_64 in some time and am
gathering needed info
When you click on the gear icon on the GDM login screen, it provides a list of
the available desktop environments so you can pick between them.
Since I exclusively use Mate on this computer, how can I remove the other
options from that menu? Earlier today when I logged in the machine decided on
On 10/04/14 16:55, Frank Cox wrote:
> When you click on the gear icon on the GDM login screen, it provides a list
> of the available desktop environments so you can pick between them.
>
> Since I exclusively use Mate on this computer, how can I remove the other
> options from that menu? Earlier
I have a full disk image file (courtesy of ddrescue), and need to mount
one of its partitions. I suppose I should have just extracted the single
partition when I was using ddrescue, but right now I have the whole disk
instead, and no disk space left to re-do the extraction (in fact I won't
be able
On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 18:34:14 -0400
Mark LaPierre wrote:
> The best way to achieve your end is to delete the unused desktop
> installations from your machine. Software not installed is the best
> defence against attack directed at that software
I agree, but I don't know what packages I can remove
On Sat, October 4, 2014 8:58 am, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 12:56 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>> > Today I found myself in need of a laptop to run Centos on. And that
>> simple statement led to an all-day odyssey.
>
>
>>
On 10/04/2014 03:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
When you click on the gear icon on the GDM login screen, it provides a list of
the available desktop environments so you can pick between them.
Since I exclusively use Mate on this computer, how can I remove the other
options from that menu? Earlier to
On 10/04/2014 05:56 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
I have a full disk image file (courtesy of ddrescue), and need to mount
one of its partitions. I suppose I should have just extracted the single
partition when I was using ddrescue, but right now I have the whole disk
instead, and no disk space left to re
On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 18:27:24 -0500
Jay Leafey wrote:
> Well, I haven't tried it, but I believe the available session types are
> stored in desktop files in /usr/share/xsessions. You could move the
> ones you don't want to a different location and see how the picker in
> GDM behaves... a bit li
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 06:34:55PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 10/04/2014 05:56 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> >I have a full disk image file (courtesy of ddrescue), and need to mount
> >one of its partitions. I suppose I should have just extracted the single
> >partition when I was using ddrescue,
I know folks have different opinions about Network Manager, but while
researching how to change the name of a NIC without rebooting, I also came
across the following page from RedHat that I’ll share as I find it’s very clear
and concise explanations on how these services interact on CentOS/RHEL
31 matches
Mail list logo
