Re: [CentOS] Anyone have LibreSSL working on CentOS 6.5?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02.10.2014 17:23, Alan McKay wrote: > Hi folks, > > I searched the list for LibreSSL and found only one mention of it! > > Has anyone gotten this working? I have it compiling no problem, > but removing OpenSSL is another story of course. It seem

[CentOS] centos 5.11 and postfix

O/S: centos 5.11 fresh install and updated this week. Postfix: most recent yum update this week Postfix is set-up to work but do not answer to 'helo'; but sendmail can. I do not have this situation in 5.4 Do somebody can figure out where I'm wrong? -- Michel Donais

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.11 and postfix

Am 03.10.2014 um 12:52 schrieb Michel Donais: O/S: centos 5.11 fresh install and updated this week. Postfix: most recent yum update this week Postfix is set-up to work but do not answer to 'helo'; but sendmail can. I do not have this situation in 5.4 Do somebody can figure out where I'm wrong?

[CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

All, I am trying to understand better how you give an interface a more descriptive name and get it all working without a reboot, if possible. We have 1G and 10G interfaces, and I’m trying to use names like 1G-internal, 1G-external, 10G-private, etc. When I boot up, it’s all fine, but if I add

Re: [CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

On 10/03/2014 09:12 AM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: All, I am trying to understand better how you give an interface a more descriptive name and get it all working without a reboot, if possible. udev is in control. You need a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules like: # net device () S

Re: [CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

On 03/10/14 09:12 AM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: All, I am trying to understand better how you give an interface a more descriptive name and get it all working without a reboot, if possible. We have 1G and 10G interfaces, and I’m trying to use names like 1G-internal, 1G-external, 10G-private,

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

On 01/10/14 11:58, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > It's very simple actually. The first step in the booting process of > CENTOS-7 is the application of emf to the system, following which it > would initiate the cmos process to load the GPT from disk and hand > over to LILO which will bootstrap the kern

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > It's very simple actually. The first step in the booting process of > CENTOS-7 is the application of emf to the system, following which it > would initiate the cmos process to load the GPT from disk and hand > over to LILO which will bootstrap the kernel from the file a

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

Timothy Murphy wrote: > Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > >> It's very simple actually. The first step in the booting process of >> CENTOS-7 is the application of emf to the system, following which it >> would initiate the cmos process to load the GPT from disk and hand >> over to LILO which will bootstr

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> It's very simple actually. The first step in the booting process of >>> CENTOS-7 is the application of emf to the system, following which it >>> would initiate the cmos process to load the GPT from disk and hand >>> over to LILO which will bootstrap the kernel from the

Re: [CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

On 03 October 2014 @13:53 zulu, Digimer wrote: On 03/10/14 09:12 AM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: All, I am trying to understand better how you give an interface a more descriptive name and get it all working without a reboot, if possible. I actually wrote a small tutorial on how to do just th

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.11 and postfix

On Fri, October 3, 2014 5:52 am, Michel Donais wrote: > O/S: centos 5.11 fresh install and updated this week. > Postfix: most recent yum update this week > > Postfix is set-up to work but do not answer to 'helo'; but sendmail can. > I do not have this situation in 5.4 > > Do somebody can figure o

Re: [CentOS] slammed

On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Always Learning wrote: All my web sites are configured as virtual hosts. The 'empty' default web site (one on every server) redirects all requests to 127.0.0.1. Sometimes I change this a Chinese consumer site. Why give the hackers and pests an opportunity to annoy you - se

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

Thanks to all. On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > >>> It's very simple actually. The first step in the booting process of > >>> CENTOS-7 is the application of emf to the system, following which it > >>> would initiate the cmos process to load the

Re: [CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

On 10/03/2014 12:38 PM, Darr247 wrote: On 03 October 2014 @13:53 zulu, Digimer wrote: On 03/10/14 09:12 AM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: All, I am trying to understand better how you give an interface a more descriptive name and get it all working without a reboot, if possible. I actually wr

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.11 and postfix

Hi Valeri, Valeri Galtsev wrote then figure out what happened and what is to blame. Thanks for the warning. I've to update my CentOS 5.10 postfix mail server, too. Could you please send your results to this list? For the time being, I am adding an exlcude for postfix to /etc/yum.conf. Gre

[CentOS] ShellShock and bash status

For those of us still in shell shock, the following was sent several days ago under a misleading subject/thread mixed in with a bunch of other nonsense. (Message-ID: <54291071.7010...@centos.org>) According to Johnny the second bash patch addressed all of the known issues. I had been waiting for

Re: [CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

Thanks to everyone who responded. This led to some interesting reading and learning, but it hasn’t avoided the reboot. I found this page on udev: How to reload udev rules without reboot? http://unix.stackexcha

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.11 and postfix

I have a CentOS5 with postfix mailserver that I updated to 5.11, no problems. I see only one rpmnew file, main.cf.rpmnew. Is it possible that the people having problems had not modified main.cf, and it was updated? On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 07:37:32PM +0200, Markus Steinborn wrote: > Hi Valeri, > >

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.11 and postfix

On Fri, October 3, 2014 2:13 pm, Greg Lindahl wrote: > I have a CentOS5 with postfix mailserver that I updated to 5.11, no > problems. I see only one rpmnew file, main.cf.rpmnew. Is it possible > that the people having problems had not modified main.cf, and it was > updated? It may be different d

Re: [CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

Of course, I found a page with a solution that worked right after sending the last email. However, without pointing to me to search for pages in google on reloading udev rules, I wouldn’t have found this so thanks to the list for the collaborative solution. http://askubuntu.com/questions/82470

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

Quoting keshab mahapatra : Thanks to all. At this address: https://www.edx.org/course/linuxfoundationx/linuxfoundationx-lfs101x-introduction-1621#.VC77Ya02l-g Is the start of edX's Intro to Linux course. I found the section on the Linux boot process clear and up to date. Dave On Fri,

Re: [CentOS] Renaming NIC name in CentOS 7

On 10/03/2014 03:11 PM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: Thanks to everyone who responded. This led to some interesting reading and learning, but it hasn’t avoided the reboot. I found this page on udev: How to reload udev rules without reboot?

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 15:50 +0100, Jake Shipton wrote: > On 01/10/14 11:58, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > > It's very simple actually. The first step in the booting process of > > CENTOS-7 is the application of emf to the system, following which it > > would initiate the cmos process to load the GP

Re: [CentOS] slammed

On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 10:03 -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Always Learning wrote: > > > All my web sites are configured as virtual hosts. The 'empty' > > default web site (one on every server) redirects all requests to > > 127.0.0.1. Sometimes I change this a Chinese consume

Re: [CentOS] slammed

On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 10:03 -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote: > I've always assumed (without any data whatsoever on which to base that > assumption) that scanbots won't follow redirects to different > addresses. Do you have any information to the contrary? If you mean by 'scanbot' a web crawler, the

[CentOS] massive load caused by smartvd

Hey all, I noticed that my puppet server running CentOS 6.5 was acting a little pokey. So I logged in and did what well just about anyone would've done. And ran the uptime command to have a look at the load. And it was astonishingly high! [root@puppet:~] #uptime 21:28:01 up 1:26, 3 users,

Re: [CentOS] massive load caused by smartvd

A quick Google for "smarvtd" returns results for both the smarvtd and whitptabil and they appear to be potential malware. Does a PS faux | grep smarvtd return a full path to the file that is running? How about top -c? — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey

Re: [CentOS] massive load caused by smartvd

Also please note the spelling of the first process. Appears your last grep was for "smartvd" when it is actually "smarvtd" — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, null wrote: > A quick Google for "smarvtd" returns results for both the smarvtd and > whitptabil and they appear to be

Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7

On 03 October 2014 @22:05 zulu, Always Learning wrote: Never ever heard anyone in the computer world refer either DC or AC (single or three phase) as EMF regardless of the voltage, amperage, resistance or impedance. EMF is actually voltage (commonly notated 'E' in P=IE type formulae).

Re: [CentOS] CUPS Enable printer from command line

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin < rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all: > > I am investigating about Common Unix Printing System (CUPS).but, I have one > doubt, when I execute the command "lpc status" , the output it's : > for example: > Printer-one: > printer is o