Am 28.09.2014 um 02:22 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:12:27AM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 27.09.2014 um 23:53 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>>> If you really need to run an old minor version, you should consider
>>> paying for the upstream Enterprise Linux. They keep all the old
Hello
Early this summer I made the decision to eliminate my Windows dual boot,
I rarely used windows. I have started a new job which will require
using a 3d CAD Inventor/Solidworks (Windows software). Inventor starts
in vmware workstation. I also switched from OpenSuSE to CentOS after
evaluating
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 01:32:38PM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote:
> It would be great to get some feedback what such cases
> are, that let people stay on older releases?
Upstream can change the kernel module API quite violently in minor
releases, which means that hardware products that have associ
Had a surprising event on C 6.5.
Exim was the only MTA installed. It was partially configured (with ACL,
Router, Transport) and definitely not running.
I was remotely testing a web page. A web page error condition invoked
the embedded PHP mail() command.
To my astonishment something in Centos wo
--On Saturday, September 27, 2014 09:50:47 PM -0600 Frank Cox
wrote:
> Is anyone using CDE on Centos these days?
I suspect hardly any, if anyone, does. To be clear, when I mentioned
CDE was referring when my workstations were Solaris.
Devin
___
Cent
I was remotely testing a web page. A web page error condition invoked
the embedded PHP mail() command.
To my astonishment something in Centos woke-up Exim. Exim sent the
email
and then became inactive again. The Exim logs does not show any
start-up
lines, just
1. input from Apache.
2. output
> On Sep 28, 2014, at 11:22, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>
>
> Not sure that this goes in the FAQ, though!
No. If people have a good reason for doing it, they will generally know that
reason. If the don't know one, they probably have no real need for staying at
the earlier release.
___
The daemon only handles incoming mail, or in other words waits for incoming
connections from other mail servers. Outgoing mail is sent on demand, or in
other words a connection is made to a mail server or relay as and when
required.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Always Learning
CDE? Shudder!! In spite of the way that modern desktops have turned out I
can't imagine anyone using CDE these days. I used to use and loath it on
HP/UX back when the Internet was a puppy.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Frank Cox
wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:43:20 -0600
> De
VLC can record the input from /dev/videoX.
See the example here:
http://www.gofree.com/Tutorials/VLCVideoWebcam.php
Chris
On 09/27/2014 09:35 PM, g wrote:
i need to make a video for legal purposes this weekend, so
any and all suggestions and recommendations greatly appreciated.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>>
> A third source is companies with homegrown code deployed on CentOS
> servers and poor-quality test suites. They tend to be in the "omg
> never change anything unless forced at gunpoint!" camp. It's an
> unfortunate situation, and it can co
On 9/27/2014 7:35 PM, g wrote:
the 2 webcam programs that i have installed from repos are 'camorama'
and 'cheese'.
both work well for single photos, but i can not get 'cheese' to make
smooth, continuous video recording. what is recorded is a jerky
motion for a few seconds, pause, short record, p
On 09/28/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
VLC can record the input from /dev/videoX.
See the example here:
http://www.gofree.com/Tutorials/VLCVideoWebcam.php
Chris,
thank you for reply.
i will check site and reply back with results.
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who n
On 09/28/2014 05:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/27/2014 7:35 PM, g wrote:
the 2 webcam programs that i have installed from repos are
'camorama' and 'cheese'.
both work well for single photos, but i can not get 'cheese' to
make smooth, continuous video recording. what is recorded is a
jerky
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> >>
> > A third source is companies with homegrown code deployed on CentOS
> > servers and poor-quality test suites. They tend to be in the "omg
> > never change anything unless forced a
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Vojin Urosevic wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>> >>
>> > A third source is companies with homegrown code deployed on CentOS
>> > servers and poor-quality test suites. They t
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> Had a surprising event on C 6.5.
>
> Exim was the only MTA installed. It was partially configured (with ACL,
> Router, Transport) and definitely not running.
>
> I was remotely testing a web page. A web page error condition invoked
> the em
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 00:03 +0400, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> You don't really need an active smtp daemon to send email or deliver it
> locally.
> $ cat /etc/php.ini | grep sendmail
"Package(s) sendmail available, but not installed."
It was Exim because the email headers said very clearly it
On 28/09/14 03:43, Devin Reade wrote:
> Ok, trying to bypass the usual flames (I used CDE for years, then
> KDE until it got dumbed-down too much, and we all know how GNOME
> has turned out) ... I've decided to try out xfce on CentOS 7.
>
> I grabbed xfce from epel by installing the following vi
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 08:36 +1000, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> checkout samhain (www.la-samhna.de/*samhain*/) if your feeling really
> paranoid.
"Sorry, we couldn't find this page for you"
Just as well as I am not paranoid :-)
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
_
My bad :-(
Cut and pasted HTML in a hurry.
Lets try plain text.
http://www.la-samhna.de/samhain/
K
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, September 28, 2014 8:16 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 08:36 +1000, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>> checkout samhain (www.la-samhna.de/*samhain*/) if your feeling really
>> paranoid.
>
> "Sorry, we couldn't find this page for you"
>
> Just as well as I am not paranoid :-)
>
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 19:27 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Applications often send mail by piping to the command 'sendmail' which
> is enough of a standard that other MTAs normally offer a compatible
> command. With 'real' sendmail you can configure it to either deliver
> in the current process or
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 11:39 +1000, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> My bad :-(
> Cut and pasted HTML in a hurry.
> Lets try plain text.
>
> http://www.la-samhna.de/samhain/
You are good. It works. Thank you.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mail
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 20:42 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> I'm sure those asterisks aren't supposed to be there. I for one have found
> webpage he means, and at a first glance the software sounds wonderful...:
>
> http://www.la-samhna.de/products.html
Seems great but probably not for me.
-
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 02:52:45AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Sendmail is not present on the server. Exim is the only MTA. Exim awoke,
> forwarded the email then became inactive (not running) again.
He didn't say sendmail the package was present; he said sendmail the
command.
rpm -qvl exi
Yeah. Not for the fainthearted. For full stealthiness you have to
compile and maintain matching (signed) server/client pairs. Not too
bad if management is well automated.
K
--
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 038
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 00:03 +0400, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>
> > You don't really need an active smtp daemon to send email or deliver it
> > locally.
> > $ cat /etc/php.ini | grep sendmail
>
> "Package(s) sendmail available, but not in
Looks like the bash exploit tune may still be playing
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/396256,further-flaws-render-shellshock-patch-ineffective.aspx
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
Hi all.
I'm trying to bring an Amazon VM into the LAN by following this guide
[0]. However, it appears that OpenSSH on either RHEL7 or CentOS7 is
broken as it is not creating tap interface but tun interface. I've
tried this on both CentOS5 and CentOS6 and they both work as
advertised! Down
On 29/09/14 15:47, Anthony K wrote:
So, what's broken in 7 - or is it that it requires something different?
I've just finished installing a CentOS7 virtual machine and guess what -
as long as both ends are CentOS7, the tap interface is created as expected!
Looks like an incompatibility iss
On 29 Sep 2014 05:37, "Frank Cox" wrote:
>
> Looks like the bash exploit tune may still be playing
>
>
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/396256,further-flaws-render-shellshock-patch-ineffective.aspx
>
Well 7169 is already patched, 7186 isn't in the RH database so it would
appear they don't consid
On 29 Sep 2014 07:37, "James Hogarth" wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Sep 2014 05:37, "Frank Cox" wrote:
> >
> > Looks like the bash exploit tune may still be playing
> >
> >
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/396256,further-flaws-render-shellshock-patch-ineffective.aspx
> >
>
> Well 7169 is already patched, 7
On 9/28/2014 11:39 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7186
Looks like we may find one more bash patch at least yet then.
per https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1306.htm the fix for 7187
and 7186 is already included in the updated fix that was releas
34 matches
Mail list logo
