Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: >> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning : > Scary screenie at: http://i.imgur.com/yR7sBjV.png >>> >>> Never mind the "scary screen" why are you deliberately using an insecure >>>

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Always Learning
> >> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning : > > > >>> Never mind the "scary screen" why are you deliberately using an insecure > >>> and out-of-date 5.4 version of Centos ? On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > Do we have a FAQ we can point people to that explains this? It's not

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread William Woods
5.4 ? really…. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about. On Sep 27, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning : >> > Scary s

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread William Woods
5.4 ? really…. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about. On Sep 27, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning : >> > Scary s

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread William Woods
5.4 ? REally 5.4…. You have lots of other issues to be concerned with. On Sep 27, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning : >> > Sca

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 09:31 -0500, William Woods wrote: > 5.4 ? really…. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about. Not me. I'm on 5.10 and 6.5. The lady who enquired was happily using C 5.4 -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread William Woods
My mistake then, apologies. On Sep 27, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 09:31 -0500, William Woods wrote: > >> 5.4 ? really…. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about. > > Not me. I'm on 5.10 and 6.5. > > The lady who enquired was happily using C

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 08:28:48 -0500 Johnny Hughes wrote: > How is this: > > http://bit.ly/1rAbtoT Two typos: Para 5: $relesever s/b $releasever Para 9: componet s/b component (3x) Outside of the typos, it looks great to me! -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatr

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Fred Smith
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:10:54AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 08:28:48 -0500 > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > How is this: > > > > http://bit.ly/1rAbtoT > > Two typos: > > Para 5: $relesever s/b $releasever > > Para 9: componet s/b component (3x) > > Outside of the typos, it lo

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Greg Lindahl
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 08:28:48AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > > Do we have a FAQ we can point people to that explains this? It's not > > obvious, and we need to educate anyone who shows up here not knowing > > the insecure nature of point releases

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread John R Pierce
On 9/27/2014 2:53 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: A. No. CentOS only updates the most recent of each of the major versions. For example, for CentOS 5, if the most recent minor version is 5.10, then that is the only version that is receiving security updates. CentOS 5.4 is frozen and never gets any updat

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 27.09.2014 um 23:53 schrieb Greg Lindahl : > If you really need to run an old minor version, you should consider > paying for the upstream Enterprise Linux. They keep all the old minor > versions up-to-date with regard to security fixes. CentOS does not. https://access.redhat.com/support/policy

Re: [CentOS] URGENT! Shellshock fix DOES NOT fix the bug on CentOS 5.4

2014-09-27 Thread Greg Lindahl
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:12:27AM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 27.09.2014 um 23:53 schrieb Greg Lindahl : > > If you really need to run an old minor version, you should consider > > paying for the upstream Enterprise Linux. They keep all the old minor > > versions up-to-date with regard to secu

[CentOS] webcam program for continuous recording.

2014-09-27 Thread g
greetings, i have run into same problem as a friend who bought a logitech c310 webcam. he told me about them being on sale, so i decided to buy one also. the 2 webcam programs that i have installed from repos are 'camorama' and 'cheese'. both work well for single photos, but i can not get 'che

[CentOS] xfce on CentOS 7: can't lock screen

2014-09-27 Thread Devin Reade
Ok, trying to bypass the usual flames (I used CDE for years, then KDE until it got dumbed-down too much, and we all know how GNOME has turned out) ... I've decided to try out xfce on CentOS 7. I grabbed xfce from epel by installing the following via yum: epel-release @xfce So far it's pretty

Re: [CentOS] xfce on CentOS 7: can't lock screen

2014-09-27 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:43:20 -0600 Devin Reade wrote: > I used CDE for years, This interests me. Is anyone using CDE on Centos these days? I've never used CDE myself so I'm wondering how it stacks up against "modern" desktops like KDE and Gnome. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinem