On 09/23/14 19:21, Jake Shipton wrote:
On 22/09/14 22:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I have one user. We've pretty much all got two monitors, but he
insists on rotating both of them vertically - that is, they're
taller than they are wide, and he's got a Radeon card. I alway
Hi Guys ..
Had some attempted attacks on my Apache server has been blocked in firewall.
But I'm
still getting the messages below in /var/log/messages.
httpd[2620] general protection ip:3bf3e06bdb sp:7f0b93ffd5c0 error:0 in
libpthread-
2.12.so[3bf3e0+17000]
httpd[15000] general protectio
Hi list,
I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
On 24/09/14 13:02, mark wrote:
> On 09/23/14 19:21, Jake Shipton wrote:
>> On 22/09/14 22:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I have one user. We've pretty much all got two monitors, but
he insists on rotating both of them vertically - that is,
they're taller than
On 09/24/2014 09:44 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 10:20 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 24.09.2014 um 16:04 schrieb Alessandro Baggi:
>>> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces
>>> name does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a
>>> different name.
On 09/24/2014 10:20 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.09.2014 um 16:04 schrieb Alessandro Baggi:
I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name does
not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a
different name.
What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by sy
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:04:39AM -0400, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces
> name does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
>
> What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
For wha
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name does
> not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
>
> What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
>
No experience
You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue.
Here's why you should care:
https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environment-variables-code-injection-attack/
Links to the centos updates:
CentOS-5:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announc
Am 07.04.2014 um 15:04 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
> On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
>> Is this legit? Anyone try this build?
>>
>
> It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0
> ... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.:
>
> http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
>> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces
>> name does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
>>
>> What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
>
> For what its wor
On 09/24/2014 10:26 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue.
>
>
> Here's why you should care:
>
> https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environment-variables-code-injection-attack/
>
>
> Links to the centos updates:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 10:26 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue.
>>
>>
>> Here's why you should care:
>>
>> https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environment-variable
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
>
> What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
They're doing it as emx, where x=[1...], except wher
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:06 PM, wrote:
>
>> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
> does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
>>
>> What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by systemd?
>
> They're doing it as emx, where x=[1
Hi, folks,
I'm about to build a filesystem on a CentOS 7 box, on a JetStore RAID box
through a QLogic ISP2532 card. Do I need to specifiy sw and su, or will
xfs query the subsystem and get that itself?
mark (assuming nixpam lets me through)
___
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:06 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying Centos7 and using systemD. I've noticed that interfaces name
>> does not have anymore eth0,eth1, ethN but a different name.
>>>
>>> What do you think about predictable network if name assigned by
>>> systemd?
>>
>> Th
I went to the RH site and used wget to download an offline copy for
some work I'm doing. When I went back I had a gig of text and no end
in sight. This was due to multiple (a lot) languages. I tried
downloading the English version only but it seems there are links
somehow that lead every ti
On 09/24/2014 05:37 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Does anyone have a URL for a downloadable implementation guide for
> English only?
I don't see an implementation guide, but all of the docs at
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/
seems to be available as a single HTM
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all* of
my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark, CentOS 6.5
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark wrote:
> I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all*
> of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
>
> mark, CentOS 6.5
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
Hi all,
I try to setup a Samba/Openchange service.
In the Oopenchange documentation, they advise to launch samba in an
interactive mode and a verbose level: I like that.
http://www.openchange.org/cookbook/configuring.html
# samba -d3 -i -M single
The problem is I want to launch it via an i
good morning,
>>> You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue.
I installed the update on C5 and C6 machines, but I do not see any
difference in the output of "bash --version". Is that the expected
behaviour?
C5 returns
---8<---
GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (x86_64-re
On 24 Sep 2014 17:12, "Johnny Hughes" wrote:
>
>
>
> For informational purposes:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/1200223
>
As a by heads up that advisory has been updated since the updated packages
were released.
The fix in the previous packages is incomplete and there is a new cve being
Hi,
For the last few updates I'm having a yum problem.
# yum update
gives the following error for e.g.
Running transaction
Updating : bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2.x86_64 1/10
Error unpacking rpm package bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2.x86_64
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/bin/
25 matches
Mail list logo
