Hi,
I just installed CentOS 7 on my NB and I'm experiencing problem during
switching the workspace in GNOME3 environment. The workspace on my NB
display is working correctly after change from one workspace to another.
But the windows placed on the external/second display stay on the active
wo
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:31 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]
>
>Ok, folks,
>
> Here's the answer:
On 9/5/2014 07:18, Richard Zimmerman wrote:
Until I read this thread, I've never heard of building RAIDs on bare
metal drives. I'm assuming no partition table, just a disk label?
I don't know what you mean by a disk label. BSD uses that term for
their alternative to MBR and GPT partition tab
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:01:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/5/2014 07:18, Richard Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> >Until I read this thread, I've never heard of building RAIDs on bare
> >metal drives. I'm assuming no partition table, just a disk label?
>
> I don't know what you mean by a disk labe
On 9/5/2014 08:18, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:01:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
I don't know what you mean by a disk label.
There is another method of disk naming, I think it gained popularity
between /dev/sda and UUID, that was something like LABEL=swap or
LABEL=root.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> So the real question is, why do you believe you need to make each RAID
> member a *partition* on a disk, instead of just take over the entire disk?
> Unless you're going to do something insane like:
>
> /dev/md0
>/dev/sda1
>
That's problem. AHCI is the standard for SATA, running modern SATA drives,
especially SSD require the AHCI command structure. Running modern SATA drives
in IDE (ATA) mode is not readily supported.
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
Hi,
Check the Gnome Tweak tool, in the Display section, if memory doesn't trick me.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Moravcik"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Friday, 5 September, 2014 9:30:55 AM
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 18:16
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
> > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:34
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Sub
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Les Mikesell
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 12:54 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bare drive RAID question, was RE: *very* ugly mdadm issue
[Solved, badly]
On Fri, Sep 5
First, let me note that I wouldn't consider it cool to forward email with
tech support to a mailing list, complete with your s/n's, etc.
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> That's problem. AHCI is the standard for SATA, running modern SATA drives,
> especially SSD require the AHCI command structure. Running mod
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason Pyeron
>> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 18:16
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
>> > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:34
>> > To:
> -Original Message-
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 14:50
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Jason Pyeron
> >> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 18:16
> >>
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 14:45
>
> First, let me note that I wouldn't consider it cool to
> forward email with
> tech support to a mailing list, complete with your s/n's, etc.
Problem between the keyboard and chair. I pasted the cen
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:01:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> So the real question is, why do you believe you need to make each RAID
> member a *partition* on a disk, instead of just take over the entire
> disk? Unless you're going to do something insane like:
For me I have things like
sda
There seems to be a problem with my local dns server resolving
mirror.centos.org.
I know something about dns but obviously not enough to figure out what
might be wrong here or how to fix
this in bind configs. The SERVFAIL errors below seem to be related to
and MX queries for the domain.
Pl
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> >> From: Jason Pyeron
>> >> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
>> >> > On 8/31/2014 2:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> >> > > Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing
>> >> > from spinn
By the bye, about firmware updates: I like Dell's the best of all. HP, run
it from some kind of DOS, and hope. Dell, you can do from a running CentOS
system (I've done it a few times), and unlike everyone else's firmware
updates, it says, "collecting information", then *tells* you that a) this
upda
> -Original Message-
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 15:19
> To: CentOS mailing list
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> >> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >> >> From: Jason Pyeron
> >> >> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
>
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Dumb question: these machines are getting very long in the tooth, but
>> you're putting SSD's in them? New, or newer machines, would
>
>> solve a lot of problems
>
> Their warrantees are good for another few years... And the money is not :)
War
On Fri, September 5, 2014 2:02 pm, Stephen Harris wrote:
> For me I have things like
> sda1
> sdb2
> sdc3
> sdd4
> and I align the partitions to the physical slot.
What do you do when it comes to 5,... (as MBR only supports 4 primary
partitions ;-) ?
> This makes it easier to see what is
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Fri, September 5, 2014 2:02 pm, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
>> For me I have things like
>> sda1
>> sdb2
>> sdc3
>> sdd4
>> and I align the partitions to the physical slot.
>
> What do you do when it comes to 5,... (as MBR only supports 4 primary
> partitions ;-) ?
T
Hey just coming into this conversation. Here is an Idea.. Why not
install a SATA card into the machine, one that supports AHCI. I'm
guessing there is a free PCI or PCI-E slot.
They are made, here is a link, I found quickly with a google search..
Bang for buck, it could be the cheapest option.
http://www.inateck.com/inateck-kt4005-4-port-usb-3-0-pci-express-card-no-additional-power-connection-needed/
Will these work under Centos 6.x? Can I just boot my home system with
a CentOS 6.x live CD to test?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
On 2014-09-05, Richard Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Until I read this thread, I've never heard of building RAIDs on bare metal
> drives. I'm assuming no partition table, just a disk label?
>
> What is the advantage of doing this?
For just my purposes, the advantage is that I can treat my md RAID
drives
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:18:13 -0400
Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:01:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> > On 9/5/2014 07:18, Richard Zimmerman wrote:
> > >
> > >Until I read this thread, I've never heard of building RAIDs on bare
> > >metal drives. I'm assuming no partition table
Tried it and CentOS 6 did not seem to find it. Anyone know of a USB
3.0 card that does work with Centos 6.x?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Matt wrote:
> http://www.inateck.com/inateck-kt4005-4-port-usb-3-0-pci-express-card-no-additional-power-connection-needed/
>
> Will these work under Cento
I was under the understanding that you CAN put in larger drives, BUT
they format identically to the smaller drive. There are some exceptions
I do not remember what.
D.
On 9/5/2014 4:26 PM, Bob Marcan wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:18:13 -0400
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:01
On 2014-09-05, Bob Marcan wrote:
>
> When the disk dies, the replacement disk must be exactly the same size.
> Been there, done that.
> I allways make partition few GB smaller than the physical size.
> It's not always possible to get the same type of the replacement disk.
I thought that newer ver
29 matches
Mail list logo
