On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2014 11:10, "C. L. Martinez" wrote:
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> a) start daemon1
>> b) if daemon1 returns no startup errors, launch daemon2
>> c) if daemon1 returns any startup error, doesn't start daemon2 and exit.
>>
>> Is it possible
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 2 Sep 2014 10:12, "C. L. Martinez" wrote:
>
>
> Thanks james. That was my first idea ... But some of these daemons can
> conflict with some system packages. For example I need to startup two
> rsyslog daemons, and this can be a problem ... or not??
So long as they don't conflict in ports or so
On 8/29/2014 14:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Note that we did this on *raw*, unpartitioned drives (not my idea).
Nothing wrong with that, particularly with big "midden" volumes like
this one.
I added
/dev/sdc to /dev/md4, and it started rebuilding.
*facepalm*
You forgot the primary maxim
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 10:10 +, C. L. Martinez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am doing some tests with a CentOS7 vm image before to enter in our
> production environment. I need to migrate some sysvinit scripts to
> systemctl.
>
> In all of them I need to launch some daemons in the same init script.
On 2 September 2014 18:43, Darod Zyree wrote:
>
>
> ExecStartPre=, ExecStartPost=
>
> Additional commands that are executed before or after the command in
> ExecStart=, respectively. Syntax is the same as for ExecStart=, except
> that multiple command lines are allowed and the commands are ex
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/29/2014 14:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>
>> Note that we did this on *raw*, unpartitioned drives (not my idea).
>
>
>> I added
>> /dev/sdc to /dev/md4, and it started rebuilding.
>
> I know this isn't the answer you wanted, but it's
On 2014-09-02, Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/29/2014 14:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Note that we did this on *raw*, unpartitioned drives (not my idea).
>
> Nothing wrong with that, particularly with big "midden" volumes like
> this one.
Indeed--hardware RAID controllers don't partition their
On 9/2/2014 12:05, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-09-02, Warren Young wrote:
On 8/29/2014 14:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Note that we did this on *raw*, unpartitioned drives (not my idea).
Nothing wrong with that, particularly with big "midden" volumes like
this one.
Indeed--hardware RAID co
On Aug 29, 2014, at 3:26 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> mdadm -E /dev/sdd
Just to confirm that /dev/sdd is the new disk after you rebooted, the right
model and serial number, drive letters are assigned based on the order the
block devices are detected so can change on reboot.
—
Mark Tinberg
m
I'm the OP, here
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 8/29/2014 14:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that we did this on *raw*, unpartitioned drives (not my idea).
>>
>>> I added /dev/sdc to /dev/md4, and it started rebuilding.
> I haven't u
I've had a request to downgrade R on one server, to match three others
(someone who's just left had important scripts, and I assume they break
going a full subrelease...). The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5; the others are running 3.0.1-1. ALL are CentOS 6.5, yet yum
downgrade tells
On 9/2/2014 11:37 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've had a request to downgrade R on one server, to match three others
(someone who's just left had important scripts, and I assume they break
going a full subrelease...). The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5; the others are running 3.0.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:33 PM, wrote:
>
>> I haven't used raw devices as members so I'm not sure I understand the
>> scenario. However, I thought that devices over 2TB would not auto
>> assemble so you would have to manually add the ARRAY entry for
>> /dev/md4 in /etc/mdadm.conf containing /de
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:33 PM, wrote:
>>> But sdd _should_ have the correct data - it just isn't being detected
>>> as a raid member. I think with smaller devices - or at least devices
>>> with smaller partitions and FD type in the MBR it would have worked
>>> automatica
On 9/2/2014 12:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5;
??
The latest version of R is 3.1.1: http://www.r-project.org/
Do you mean 3.1.0-5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mail
Hmm, very bad idea to create a file system on the raw disk.
The swap type partitions know how to handle this well
but for a partition with data why take the chance that
something will write the MBR there. That's what happenned
I bet.
The procedure is this:
Create a partition 1 on the new unused d
GKH wrote:
> Hmm, very bad idea to create a file system on the raw disk.
> The swap type partitions know how to handle this well
> but for a partition with data why take the chance that
> something will write the MBR there. That's what happenned
> I bet.
>
I know how to do this - it *is* how I star
Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/2/2014 12:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> The server they want downgraded is running
>> 4.1.0-5;
>
> ??
>
> The latest version of R is 3.1.1: http://www.r-project.org/
>
> Do you mean 3.1.0-5?
Sorry, typo. I've been a tad busy today... any busier, and I'd feel like a
one-
On 9/2/2014 1:17 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
>On 9/2/2014 12:37,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>The server they want downgraded is running
>>4.1.0-5;
>
>??
>
>The latest version of R is 3.1.1:http://www.r-project.org/
>
>Do you mean 3.1.0-5?
Sorry, typo. I've been a tad busy to
On 09/02/2014 04:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I know how to do this - it *is* how I started. Also, I guess you didn't
read the original post - these are 4TB drives, so no MBR, GPT only.
And my manager has taken a fancy to raw drives; not sure why.
Wait just a minute. How can you use the
Hello,
This is my first post to this mailing list. I have disks set up:
disk 1: windows 8.1 pro (entire disk)
disk 2: openSUSE 13.1 - 1 partition, storage on partition 2
disk 3: Fedora 20 - 1 partition, storage on partition 2
disk 4: CentOS 7 (entire disk)
My grub2 screen is located on disk 2 a
> Wait just a minute. How can you use the raw device but still have a GPT
> on it? That doesn't seem right, to have a GUID Partition Table but no
> partitions.
Have you never deleted all the partitions on a disk under any scheme before?
___
CentOS m
The CentOS Project will be having a Dojo at Fossetcon 2014 in Orlando
Florida on 11 September 2014.
We will have a room for the entire day with presentations in the morning
and a hackfest in the afternoon.
Jim Perrin and Johnny Hughes from the CentOS team will be at the event
(maybe a few other C
Hi Alexander,
Thank for replying me!
I tried follow your ideas.
My if-down script was not working.
However i find out this issue regrading xl2tpd.
In/Makefile/ of xl2tpd source code v 1.3.6 :
"/-DTRUST_PPPD_TO_DIE //
//...//
//# The cost of not trusting pppd to die (and
On 2014-09-02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And my manager has taken a fancy to raw drives; not sure why.
Some reasons have already been cited in this thread. No reasons are
given, but the author of md and mdadm apparently prefers raw drives
too.
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Partition_Ty
Hello and apologies for being off-topic, but this is my last option!
I've been looking for a PERC simulator to help with training, but for
the life of me, I cannot find it anywhere on the internet! I even
called Dell to see if they can offer me a download link to no avail. I
know there is on
On 9/2/2014 11:41 PM, Anthony K wrote:
I've been looking for a PERC simulator to help with training, but for
the life of me, I cannot find it anywhere on the internet! I even
called Dell to see if they can offer me a download link to no avail.
I know there is one somewhere as I've seen screen
add "rhgb quiet" to the end of the grub kernel command line (the one
containing /vmlinuz-...).
rhgb = "Redhat Graphical Boot"
I assume you handcrafted the boot. You will see CentOS 7 has this
in /etc/default/grub.
Alan
On 03/09/2014 11:15, Reynold wrote:
Hello,
This is my first post to this
29 matches
Mail list logo
