Re: [CentOS] SELinux vs. virsh

2014-08-25 Thread Bill Gee
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 06:45:14 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 08/23/2014 10:45 AM, Bill Gee wrote: > > On Friday, August 22, 2014 08:50:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> On 08/21/2014 10:03 AM, Bill Gee wrote: > >>> On Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:00:03 centos-requ...@centos.org wrote: > Re: [Cen

[CentOS] OT: Linksys router misbehaviour

2014-08-25 Thread Timothy Murphy
I'm running a Linksys WRT54GL router from my CentOS-7 home server. Every now and then (maybe once every 2 days) the router's WiFi cuts out, and I've found no way to solve this except to disconnect the power from the router, wait 10 seconds and then re-connect. This always works. The router is runni

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linksys router misbehaviour

2014-08-25 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm running a Linksys WRT54GL router from my CentOS-7 home server. > Every now and then (maybe once every 2 days) the router's WiFi cuts out, > and I've found no way to solve this except to disconnect the power > from the router, wait 10 sec

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linksys router misbehaviour

2014-08-25 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 03:50:50PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm running a Linksys WRT54GL router from my CentOS-7 home server. > Every now and then (maybe once every 2 days) the router's WiFi cuts out, > and I've found no way to solve this except to disconnect the power > from the router, wai

Re: [CentOS] Compiling modules in kernel source but not included in distro.

2014-08-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andrew Stringer wrote: > Hi Akemi, > >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Andrew Stringer >> If you still wish to learn how to build a kernel module, we can help you. >> > Yes, although not of huge interest now I have achieved what I wanted to, > it would be of int

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager

2014-08-25 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Em 23-08-2014 19:30, Steve Clark escreveu: > On 08/22/2014 07:42 PM, Digimer wrote: >> On 22/08/14 07:07 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Digimer wrote: To continue your analogy, should car companies have stopped changing after the 20s? I mean, the cars then g

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager

2014-08-25 Thread Digimer
On 25/08/14 12:38 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 23-08-2014 19:30, Steve Clark escreveu: >> On 08/22/2014 07:42 PM, Digimer wrote: >>> On 22/08/14 07:07 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Digimer wrote: > To continue your analogy, should car companies have s

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linksys router misbehaviour

2014-08-25 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/25/2014 6:50 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > But I've been reading posts recently saying that > there hasn't really been a Linux router to replace the WRT54GL, > and in particular Linksys's recent 11n replacement > is not as good as the old model in many ways. thats a very odd statement. the rad

[CentOS] Hardware raid health?

2014-08-25 Thread Les Mikesell
I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of the art in linux software monitoring for this? Long ago when that box was set up I think

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?

2014-08-25 Thread Digimer
On 25/08/14 04:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both > drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it > from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of > the art in linux software monitoring for

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?

2014-08-25 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 16:03 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] Hardware raid health? > > I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?

2014-08-25 Thread Digimer
On 25/08/14 04:11 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell >> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 16:03 >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: [CentOS] Hardware raid health? >> >> I just had an

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?

2014-08-25 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/25/2014 1:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both > drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it > from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of > the art in linux software monitoring for

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?

2014-08-25 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Digimer > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 16:23 > > On 25/08/14 04:11 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org > >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell > >> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014

[CentOS] Packages cmake (base) and metis (epel) conflict with each other

2014-08-25 Thread Peter Wood
[root@build6 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.5 (Final) [root@build6 ~]# [root@build6 ~]# uname -a Linux build6 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@build6 ~]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Cleaning r

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid health?

2014-08-25 Thread Keith Keller
On 2014-08-25, John R Pierce wrote: > > IF megacli64 works for this raid controller, then I tweaked some python > scripts I found online and use these two scripts.. these live in > /root/bin as they are only for root's use. They can probably go anywhere, since a normal user won't have the per

[CentOS] Postfix setup

2014-08-25 Thread Timothy Murphy
I'm trying to clarify the various ways in which I could set up Postfix + Dovecot + SpamAssassin under CentOS-7, and I'd welcome any comments on the following remarks. As far as I can see there are 3 standard ways of setting this up: 1. Use amavisd 2. Use dovecot + pigeonhole/sieve 3. Use spa

Re: [CentOS] Postfix setup

2014-08-25 Thread Greg Bailey
On 08/25/2014 03:52 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm trying to clarify the various ways in which I could set up > Postfix + Dovecot + SpamAssassin under CentOS-7, > and I'd welcome any comments on the following remarks. > > As far as I can see there are 3 standard ways of setting this up: >1. Us

Re: [CentOS] Port scanning from MicroSoft?

2014-08-25 Thread Nathan Duehr
On Aug 20, 2014, at 9:06, James B. Byrne wrote: > This mornings activity log shows this: > > . . . > From 23.102.132.99 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) > From 23.102.133.164 - 1 packet to tcp(3389) > From 23.102.134.239 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) > From 23.102.136.210 - 3 packets to tcp(3389) >

[CentOS] Dual boot with Windows 8.1, UEFI

2014-08-25 Thread Andrew Daviel
(apologies for the length - there are questions at the end...) I've been running Linux for 20 years, and done a lot of dual-boots. I know that's old-school now, but I run Linux 95% of the time yet don't want to lose a Windows system I've paid for - but I've never tried removing it from a system

Re: [CentOS] Dual boot with Windows 8.1, UEFI

2014-08-25 Thread Hal Wigoda
Wow. (Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for any spelling or grammatical errors.) > On Aug 25, 2014, at 7:57 PM, Andrew Daviel wrote: > > (apologies for the length - there are questions at the end...) > > I've been running Linux for 20 years, and done a lot of dual-b

Re: [CentOS] Packages cmake (base) and metis (epel) conflict with each other

2014-08-25 Thread Warren Young
On 8/25/2014 15:06, Peter Wood wrote: > > I don't recall ever running into a conflict between packages in base and > packages in epel repositories. I see it here, too. It's clearly a packaging bug, probably due to the fact that the more recent Red Hattish Linuxes use CMake 2.8+. EPEL has a cmak

Re: [CentOS] Port scanning from MicroSoft?

2014-08-25 Thread Warren Young
On 8/25/2014 18:18, Nathan Duehr wrote: > > How one could get into the VM business without KNOWING idiots would > happily pay for and utilize VMs on big bandwidth to do stupid human > tricks, and take appropriate precautions NOT to become part of the > problem… is beyond me. Easy. 1. Most of the

Re: [CentOS] ipset module loaded at startup on CentOS 6.5

2014-08-25 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/10/2014 02:18 PM, Rob Townley wrote: > Anybody on here successfully get ipset iptables sets to work _after_ a > reboot? Here's an init script that I wrote for CentOS 6. (systemd haters can take note of how much easier it would have been to write a unit file.) -- ==