Is anyone running ddclient under the CentOS-7?
It doesn't seem to be in epel.
I've downloaded the source and it is running,
but giving me endless warnings.
Could I run it as a daemon?
I'm not sure if this is allowed nowadays.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathemat
On 07/20/2014 03:19 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 01:24:54AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> On 07/20/2014 01:12 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
>>> Hello John, very kind of you for your reply.
>>>
>>> However, I did tried groupinstall and it shows error saying that there
>>> is none g
On 07/20/2014 10:44 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 07/20/2014 03:19 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 01:24:54AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> On 07/20/2014 01:12 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello John, very kind of you for your reply.
However, I did tried groupi
On 07/20/2014 02:02 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
> It seems that actually the packages are in the grouplist. But for some
> unknown reason when I hit:
>
> yum groupinstall "Development Tools" it shows:
>
> No packages in any requested group available to install or update.
>
>
>
>
> El 19/07/2014 06:
On 07/20/2014 03:22 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> I'm at the stage of poking at a C7 install in Vbox, and am struggling to
> figure out how to control the screensaver. there doesn't seem to be a
> gnome screensaver package (like there was in gnome2), and I can't find
> any installed packages that contro
On 7/20/2014 1:46 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Ahh, 1 letter T too many, 'DevelopmTent Tools"!
>> >
> False alarm. I just checked and OP did not make the error
every time its not worked for me, its been a spelling error.
your mileage may vary.
--
john r pierce
Hi Guys,
same problem here, here is my output :
[c7@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core)
also, yum grouplist -v, gives me :
...
Available Groups:
CIFS file server (cifs-file-server)
Compatibility Libraries (compat-libraries)
Console Internet Tools (c
Hello Ljubomir,
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 00:49:29 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 07/19/2014 11:55 PM, wwp wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> >
> > the *old* PC (Turion 64 MT-32 800MHz, 1Gb RAM) of my gf is running
> > Windows XP, and I plan on installing a CentOS beside of it, allowing
> > her t
On 07/19/2014 05:30 AM, g wrote:
>
> On 07/19/2014 06:25 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
> <<>>
>
>> 2. I install a custom hosts file ( http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
>> ). This protects all applications in one swoop, not just the browser.
> or so it is claimed.
>
> i saw post about it. pulled it.
On 07/20/2014 04:18 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
> On 07/19/2014 05:30 AM, g wrote:
>> On 07/19/2014 06:25 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
>> <<>>
>>
>>> 2. I install a custom hosts file ( http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
>>> ). This protects all applications in one swoop, not just the browser.
>> or s
I finally have got around to installing centos 7 and usually do a
pretty minimal installation, I chose the virtualization host, since
that will be the primary purpose. However I have hit a snag, I
usually install xfce from epel and go along my way but there appears
to be a bug in the xfce package:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:48:41 -0500
Tom Bishop wrote:
> entos 7 or any other
> alternatives to kde/gnome3.
I'm using mate from epel.
yum group install "Mate Desktop"
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS
I am trying to understand the relevance of the abrt program. It pops up
automatically when somethings acts up, but I can't submit anything to RH,
because I haven't paid their fees. It is a very bad user experience to go
through the whole process of describing what led up to the problem and get
On 07/20/2014 02:11 PM, Ted Miller wrote:
> I am trying to understand the relevance of the abrt program. It pops up
> automatically when somethings acts up, but I can't submit anything to RH,
> because I haven't paid their fees. It is a very bad user experience to go
> through the whole proces
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/20/2014 02:11 PM, Ted Miller wrote:
>> I am trying to understand the relevance of the abrt program. It pops up
>> automatically when somethings acts up, but I can't submit anything to RH,
>> because I haven't paid their fees. It is a
On 07/20/2014 02:34 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 07/20/2014 02:11 PM, Ted Miller wrote:
>>> I am trying to understand the relevance of the abrt program. It pops up
>>> automatically when somethings acts up, but I can't submit anything to RH,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Yep, we will do it. Again, patches welcome.
And I'd be happy to submit patches, if I had the first clue about
abrt. Maybe I can find some time to look at it next week, or maybe
not. But is there a drawback to just dropping the abrt packag
On 07/20/2014 03:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/20/2014 02:11 PM, Ted Miller wrote:
>> I am trying to understand the relevance of the abrt program. It pops up
>> automatically when somethings acts up, but I can't submit anything to RH,
>> because I haven't paid their fees. It is a very bad u
I had some packages that I needed to install and they have some
issues, I installed via rpm and did some linking and got them working.
However Yum still thinks that they are broken:
** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
has missing requires of python(abi) = ('0', '
On 07/20/2014 08:25 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> I had some packages that I needed to install and they have some
> issues, I installed via rpm and did some linking and got them working.
> However Yum still thinks that they are broken:
They are still broken. Yum and rpm are not aware of changes made o
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2014 08:25 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
>> I had some packages that I needed to install and they have some
>> issues, I installed via rpm and did some linking and got them working.
>> However Yum still thinks that they are broken:
>
> The
El 20/07/2014 05:10 a.m., Mr iQ escribió:
> Hi Guys,
>
> same problem here, here is my output :
> [c7@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core)
>
> also, yum grouplist -v, gives me :
> ...
> Available Groups:
> CIFS file server (cifs-file-server)
> Compati
On 07/20/2014 10:43 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> I can live with the annoying message I was hoping there was an exclude
> or forget option that I was not aware of that I could do so it
> wouldn't complain any more.
Nope. Because then people do that. The yum folks have actively NOT put
this in place,
23 matches
Mail list logo
