On 07/18/2014 02:19 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> I note EPEL has a thunderbird package but it seems very out of date at
> version 24.5.0. Version 24.6.0 was released 10 June, nearly 6 weeks ago,
> and fixed 3 critical security issues. Is this normal for EPEL to be so
> far behind on security updates?
>
On 07/18/2014 05:34 PM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
> Is anyone using CentOS 6 on PC104 stacks?
> I have tried a couple of different CPU cards with CentOS 6.5 [no updates]. I
> can install with the Install DVD to the PATA hard drive just fine, but they
> each hang up whil
On 19/07/14 13:25, Chris Pemberton wrote:
>
> On 07/18/2014 02:19 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
>> I note EPEL has a thunderbird package but it seems very out of date at
>> version 24.5.0. Version 24.6.0 was released 10 June, nearly 6 weeks ago,
>> and fixed 3 critical security issues. Is this normal for
On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 09:08 +0300, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
> It is actually funny how there seems to be so many opponents of systemd
> who want back the old ways of doing things.
These are the causes:-
1. Familiarity with something that works and can be modified without
much effort- very imp
On 07/18/2014 02:19 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just wondering what Thunderbird users are doing on el7 now it's been
> removed from the distro?
>
> I note EPEL has a thunderbird package but it seems very out of date at
> version 24.5.0. Version 24.6.0 was released 10 June, nearly 6 weeks
On Jul 19, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 09:08 +0300, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
>
>> It is actually funny how there seems to be so many opponents of systemd
>> who want back the old ways of doing things.
>
> These are the causes:-
>
> 1. Familiarity with
On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 09:08 +0300, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
>
>> It is actually funny how there seems to be so many opponents of systemd
>> who want back the old ways of doing things.
> These are the causes:-
>
> 1. Familiarity with something that
On 07/19/2014 11:10 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 09:08 +0300, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
>>
>>> It is actually funny how there seems to be so many opponents of systemd
>>> who want back the old ways of doing things.
>> These are
On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> > 4. Lack of knowledge about the replacement.
> Well .. all of that may be true and systemd may be the devil ... but we
> would still have it as CentOS-7 rebuilds RHEL-7 sources. Debatin
On 07/09/2014 10:19 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 07/09/2014 02:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us
> wrote:
>> Interesting... can I do that with the preupgrade from 6.5? And I *rarely*
>> see grub updated
>
> I'm not familiar with preupgrade, but I would guess that this method
> wouldn't work. (Actually I
On 07/13/2014 07:31 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I downloaded the netinstall iso, burned it to disk, and tried to install on
> my old Dell PowerEdge 2900 (Intel Xeon / 8Gb ram). Machine is connected to a
> KVM. The Centos 6 netinstall iso worked flawlessly on this exact
> con
On 07/15/2014 08:25 PM, Florian La Roche wrote:
> Hello Eero Volotinen,
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:59:14PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Are you really using firewalld and network-manager on Centos 7 production
>> servers or old way disabling network manager and using pure ipt
On 07/16/2014 11:19 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> Chris Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> On 07/15/2014 09:59 AM, Steve wrote:
>>> Anyone?
>>>
>> Gnome 3 was released over 3 years ago... a simple web search yields:
>>
>> # yum install dconf-editor
>>
>> It's all in there.
>
> But Gnome 3 is new to CentOS. In
On 07/17/2014 03:33 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
> The grub2 boot loader is installed in a /boot partition in my Fedora 20
> installation and works properly. But I do create 1 GB boot partitions
> and maybe most people do not use as much space for their boot partition
> as I do.
>
>From last 1-2
On Jul 19, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>>> 4. Lack of knowledge about the replacement.
>
>> Well .. all of that may be true and systemd may be the devil ... but we
I installed CentOS 7 on a Shuttle X27D box (dual-core Atom 330), and
so far it seems to work fine, but it didn't set up a Grub2 entry for
the existing Windows XP installation in the first partition (MBR).
Running os-prober generates no output.
fdisk shows that the NTFS partition is still present a
On 07/19/2014 06:25 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
<<>>
> 2. I install a custom hosts file ( http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
> ). This protects all applications in one swoop, not just the browser.
or so it is claimed.
i saw post about it. pulled it. backed up my custom list. added
custom list
On 07/19/2014 05:30 AM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 07/19/2014 06:25 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
> <<>>
>
>> 2. I install a custom hosts file ( http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
>> ). This protects all applications in one swoop, not just the browser.
>
> or so it is claimed.
>
> i saw post about it. pulle
On 07/19/2014 11:24 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I installed CentOS 7 on a Shuttle X27D box (dual-core Atom 330), and
> so far it seems to work fine, but it didn't set up a Grub2 entry for
> the existing Windows XP installation in the first partition (MBR).
> Running os-prober generates no output.
>
>
Hello there,
the *old* PC (Turion 64 MT-32 800MHz, 1Gb RAM) of my gf is running
Windows XP, and I plan on installing a CentOS beside of it, allowing
her to select the OS at boot-time. Other system/OS installing options
are not retained, please avoid ;-).
My first attempt was to install the CentO
On 7/19/2014 2:55 PM, wwp wrote:
> nor
> shrink the NTFS partition in order to install the CentOS6 system on
> disk.
I strongly dislike shrinking file systems in place, and prefer to backup
the whole FS, repartition the disk, then restore the FS to the new
smaller partition. for Windows NTFS s
Hello John,
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:07:08 -0700 John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/19/2014 2:55 PM, wwp wrote:
> > nor
> > shrink the NTFS partition in order to install the CentOS6 system on
> > disk.
>
> I strongly dislike shrinking file systems in place, and prefer to backup
> the whole FS, reparti
On 07/19/2014 11:55 PM, wwp wrote:
> Hello there,
>
>
> the *old* PC (Turion 64 MT-32 800MHz, 1Gb RAM) of my gf is running
> Windows XP, and I plan on installing a CentOS beside of it, allowing
> her to select the OS at boot-time. Other system/OS installing options
> are not retained, please avoi
Hello.
I've been looking for information regarding how to install Development
Tools and Libraries on CentOS 7 but had no luck.
Would any one be so kind to share how wtih me?
Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
On 7/19/2014 4:00 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
> I've been looking for information regarding how to install Development
> Tools and Libraries on CentOS 7 but had no luck.
>
> Would any one be so kind to share how wtih me?
yum groupinstall "Development Tools" worked for all previous
versions.yum group
Hello John, very kind of you for your reply.
However, I did tried groupinstall and it shows error saying that there
is none group list of that name. Even after yum grouplist and I see it
there. It keeps failing. It only offer a solution: yum group mark
install ... which is not the actual comman
On 07/20/2014 01:12 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
> Hello John, very kind of you for your reply.
>
> However, I did tried groupinstall and it shows error saying that there
> is none group list of that name. Even after yum grouplist and I see it
> there. It keeps failing. It only offer a solution: yum gro
Hi Ljubomir,
Yes I have :). I've been working with this distro since CentOS 4, so I
familiar with it. That is why I am concerned about grouinstall of dev
tools is not working as always.
El 19/07/2014 06:24 p.m., Ljubomir Ljubojevic escribió:
> On 07/20/2014 01:12 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
>> Hello
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 06:12:12PM -0500, F. Mendez wrote:
> Hello John, very kind of you for your reply.
>
> However, I did tried groupinstall and it shows error saying that there
> is none group list of that name. Even after yum grouplist and I see it
> there. It keeps failing. It only offer a
On 7/19/2014 4:28 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
> Hi Ljubomir,
>
> Yes I have:). I've been working with this distro since CentOS 4, so I
> familiar with it. That is why I am concerned about grouinstall of dev
> tools is not working as always.
odd. works here...
# uname -a && cat /etc/redhat-release
Linu
Hello Scott.
The @Development I actually did'nt knew. Will try it and report.
Thanks
El 19/07/2014 06:30 p.m., Scott Robbins escribió:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 06:12:12PM -0500, F. Mendez wrote:
>> Hello John, very kind of you for your reply.
>>
>> However, I did tried groupinstall and it sho
Hi Jhon.
It is actually odd.
I done exactly what you shared and I get nothing of what you do.
El 19/07/2014 06:42 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
> On 7/19/2014 4:28 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
>> Hi Ljubomir,
>>
>> Yes I have:). I've been working with this distro since CentOS 4, so I
>> familiar with
It seems that actually the packages are in the grouplist. But for some
unknown reason when I hit:
yum groupinstall "Development Tools" it shows:
No packages in any requested group available to install or update.
El 19/07/2014 06:30 p.m., Scott Robbins escribió:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 06:1
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 06:51:21PM -0500, F. Mendez wrote:
> Hello Scott.
>
> The @Development I actually did'nt knew. Will try it and report.
>
For whatever reason--maybe because I'm left handed, so it's easier to hit @
than a ' or ", it's what I usually use. If you use yum grouplist -v, it
wi
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 01:24:54AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 07/20/2014 01:12 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
> > Hello John, very kind of you for your reply.
> >
> > However, I did tried groupinstall and it shows error saying that there
> > is none group list of that name. Even after yum group
I'm at the stage of poking at a C7 install in Vbox, and am struggling to
figure out how to control the screensaver. there doesn't seem to be a
gnome screensaver package (like there was in gnome2), and I can't find
any installed packages that control it. gconf-editor doesn't have anything
that look
36 matches
Mail list logo
