On Sun, 18 May 2014, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Have you looked at parallel filesystems such as Lustre and fhgfs?
I have not looked at Lustre, as I have heard many negative things about it
(including Oracle ownership). The only business using Lustre where I know
the admins has had a lot of trouble
I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post, but I believe this thread has
gone on way to long. Lets drop it and get back to what this mailing list is all
about. I would rather read posts about the same technical things over and over
again that have been asked hundreds of times. But when qu
Hi,
I use centos as it is stable and provides all the software that is
needed for everyday use.
However, sometimes I would like to use fresh software that is not
available as a package. Compiling from source is indeed an option but
because centos uses oldish sources not only the sought package sh
On 05/18/2014 12:10 PM, Gergely Buday wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use centos as it is stable and provides all the software that is
> needed for everyday use.
>
> However, sometimes I would like to use fresh software that is not
> available as a package. Compiling from source is indeed an option but
> becau
Am 18.05.2014 um 17:51 schrieb Chris Weisiger :
> I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post,
I can say that the usability of the mail application for such a goal
doesn't support it in the way to accomplishing it in an efficient manner,
but you can do it - it is not a nature law that is pr
Please tell me your opinion.
How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
rpms/srpms like this:
http://pull-mirror.yandex.net/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/SRPMS/chromium-pepper-flash-13.0.0.206-1.fc19.R.src.rpm
--
View this message in
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:00:32PM -0700, ngeorgop wrote:
> Please tell me your opinion.
> How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
This is not a legal mailing list. Any opinion represented is not worth
the electrons used to transmit it.
If you are concerned abo
On 18/05/14 05:21 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:00:32PM -0700, ngeorgop wrote:
>> Please tell me your opinion.
>> How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
>
> This is not a legal mailing list. Any opinion represented is not worth
> the ele
On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
> case of GlusterFS, wy too slow.
How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant
progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believ
On 05/15/2014 12:54 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm planning to setup a two-node "cluster" with file replication and samba.
A caution--a two-node replicated cluster is a poor choice. If something
gets into a split-brain condition (easier to happen than it should be)
there are only
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 06:10:57PM +0200, Gergely Buday wrote:
> However, sometimes I would like to use fresh software that is not
> available as a package. Compiling from source is indeed an option but
> because centos uses oldish sources not only the sought package should
> be built but a lot of
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 01:30:24PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > An idea is to build it in a directory, as much independent as it is
> > possible from the installed libraries on the centos installation. Is
> > there an automated build system for such an endeavour?
> Run Fedora as a VM?
Or, ru
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014, Andrew Holway wrote:
>
> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
> case of GlusterFS, wy too slow.
>
Do you really need filesystem semantics or would ceph's object store work?
--
On 05/16/2014 04:58 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> I know there's rsync, which may be a good solution.
Another solution could be rsync with zfs or btrfs.
--
Gruß,
Christian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
On 04/23/2014 12:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> I'm not sure win7/8 professional are happy about joining a NT4 Domain,
> at least not without a bunch of tinkering with security policies.
A registry patch is required, but it's working.
--
Gruß,
Christian
__
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> SME server used to be pretty good at that sort of thing (small
> business server). You could just add users and put them in groups
> with the web interface and set up file shares by group. The ClearOS
> version might be more up to date, thou
On 5/18/2014 8:51 AM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
> I'm posting from my phone so I can't bottom post
then shut up til you can get on a proper computer that actually knows
how to email.
noone cares that you're crippling yourself by using a telephone
--
john r pierce
17 matches
Mail list logo
