Am 12.05.2014 um 20:58 schrieb Akemi Yagi :
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Keith Keller
>> Are there any mitigation steps we can take? I've chased down some of
>> the links looking for any, but haven't had success yet.
>
> According to the upstream BZ 1094232, there is a patch from kernel.or
On Mon, May 12, 2014 14:05, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> dac_read_search and dac_override are usually bad to add. They typically
>> mean the permission flags on the file in question is two tight for a
>> root process to read/use.
>>
>> Loosing up the group/other permissions would probably allow a roo
On 05/13/2014 09:56 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 14:05, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>>> dac_read_search and dac_override are usually bad to add. They typically
>>> mean the permission flags on the file in question is two tight for a
>>> root process to read/use.
>>>
>>> Loosing up
don't forget to escape that exclamation point if typing on bash.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Tim Dunphy
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. But what if I want to turn that statement into one that will
>
Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
Thanks.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>
> Thanks.
>
>mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing
Laurent CREPET wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
>
>> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>>
> I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
> https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
>
a) Please don't top post.
b) Google thinks CentOS 6.x is "too ol
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:36 PM, wrote:
> Laurent CREPET wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
> >>
> > I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
> > https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
> >
> a) P
>>> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>>>
>> I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
>> https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
>>
> a) Please don't top post.
> b) Google thinks CentOS 6.x is "too old", and it's an ongoing thing about
> people managing or
Laurent CREPET wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:36 PM, wrote:
>> Laurent CREPET wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>> >>
>> > I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
>> > https://www.google.com
On 13 May 2014 @15:12 zulu, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>
>
H... how to find Richard Lloyd's script?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Install+Chrome+on+CentOS+6
Ah! There it is - http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/
Now, why does Google's algo
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Leon Fauster
wrote:
> Am 12.05.2014 um 20:58 schrieb Akemi Yagi :
>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Keith Keller
>>> Are there any mitigation steps we can take? I've chased down some of
>>> the links looking for any, but haven't had success yet.
>>
>> According
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:25 PM, wrote:
>
>>> a) Please don't top post.
>>> b) Google thinks CentOS 6.x is "too old", and it's an ongoing thing
>>> about people managing or failing to install it.
>>>
>> Sorry for top posting. Gmail default settings.
>
> On a related note, I now *really* dis
I'm trying to patch this package that I'm rpmbuilding, and its setup.py
does not link a library for one extension that it dies if it doesn't have.
Note that ldd is fooled, because there's a declaration, so it says
everything is fine... but without a definition, it dies, and that's in the
other libr
14 matches
Mail list logo
