Am 29.04.2014 um 00:18 schrieb Nathan Duehr :
> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:44 AM, James Pearson
> wrote:
>
>> Nathan Duehr wrote:
>>>
>>> Attempting to force the ulimit up inside the RC script has no effect, since
>>> the package is running
>>> as a non-root user. It fails to raise the limit.
>>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
The CentOS team is having a Dojo in São Paulo, Brazil on Monday, May
5th, 2014:
http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/SaoPaulo2014
This is a couple of days before the Free Software Forum in Porto Alegre,
Brazil ... the CentOS team will also be at FISL 15:
http://softwarelivre.org/fisl15
These are
On 04/28/2014 06:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Is this an impromptu poll? I think we had one for NM ("it's so much
> better in fedora, it was reworked..."), and everyone else, if it's not
> a laptop, wants it to Go Away. But will they listen to us?
The answer is found in the package set for RH
On 04/29/2014 02:22 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 06:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Is this an impromptu poll? I think we had one for NM ("it's so much
>> better in fedora, it was reworked..."), and everyone else, if it's not
>> a laptop, wants it to Go Away. But will they listen to us?
Dear Sir,
I am unable to work MTS MBLAZE ULTRA in CentOS 6.4. Can any
one suggest a way to active MTS MBLAZE ULTRA in CentOS 6.4 properly?
Yours faithfully
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> >
> This may be fine for users that don't know what they are doing or don't have
> a stable networking environment,
> but I have found for me it causes nothing but heartache. The first thing I do
> is disable it.
>
> The sad part is that it m
Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 02:22 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On 04/28/2014 06:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Is this an impromptu poll? I think we had one for NM ("it's so much
>>> better in fedora, it was reworked..."), and everyone else, if it's not
>>> a laptop, wants it to Go Away. But
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:17:09 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> does anyone actually use wireless, or anything other than
> hardwired, for a server?
That depends on how you define "server".
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
__
On 4/29/2014 13:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
> can you tell it
> that adding a USB device and picking up a dchp address is OK, but you
> don't want to change your default route just because dhcp offers it?
Mixed DHCP and static IP configurations is a very useful but often
neglected combination. [1]
E
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:17:09 -0400
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> does anyone actually use wireless, or anything other than
>> hardwired, for a server?
>
> That depends on how you define "server".
A Dell PowerEdge, or an HP DLx80, or a Penguin, or Why, what other
values of "
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:10 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> A Dell PowerEdge, or an HP DLx80, or a Penguin, or Why, what other
> values of "server" do you have?
Transferring files from one computer to another via ssh or ftp, for one.
Backup via rsync for two. Database access for three.
N
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:10 -0400
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> A Dell PowerEdge, or an HP DLx80, or a Penguin, or Why, what other
>> values of "server" do you have?
>
> Transferring files from one computer to another via ssh or ftp, for one.
> Backup via rsync for two. Da
On 4/29/2014 13:17, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> I mean, this is an ENTERPRISE o/s, and that means, heavily,
> *servers*, and does anyone actually use wireless, or anything other than
> hardwired, for a server?
I think you're setting up false dichotomies here. It isn't about
desktop vs server, or
On 4/29/2014 14:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> "Trains stop at a train station, buses stop at a bus station"
Taxis stop at the train station, cars park at the bus station, busses
pull up to the airport...
The lines aren't as sharp as you're trying to draw them.
Warren Young wrote:
> On 4/29/2014 13:17, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> I mean, this is an ENTERPRISE o/s, and that means, heavily,
>> *servers*, and does anyone actually use wireless, or anything other than
>> hardwired, for a server?
>
> I think you're setting up false dichotomies here. It isn't
Warren Young wrote:
> On 4/29/2014 14:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> "Trains stop at a train station, buses stop at a bus station"
>
> Taxis stop at the train station, cars park at the bus station, busses
> pull up to the airport...
>
> The lines aren't as sharp as you're trying to draw them
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 4/29/2014 13:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> can you tell it
>> that adding a USB device and picking up a dchp address is OK, but you
>> don't want to change your default route just because dhcp offers it?
>
> Mixed DHCP and static IP configurat
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 4/29/2014 13:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> can you tell it
>>> that adding a USB device and picking up a dchp address is OK, but you
>>> don't want to change your default route just because dhcp offers it?
>>
>> Mixed D
On 4/29/2014 14:15, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Compute node... it automatically detects a
> GPU(s)? It comes with PBS/Torque installed? Fuse? Gluster? Ready to be
> joined to a cluster? I'd like to see what their definition of "compute
> node" is
It's probably the RHEL7 version of their HPC o
20 matches
Mail list logo
