Hi,
I'm currently using Flash Player 11,2,202,346. The most recent version
is 11.2.202.350. The package is from rpmforge. When will be there an update?
- Chris
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Keith Keller wrote:
>> I would like the server with a dynamic IP address
>> to be accessible through a fixed name.
>
> Here's a list I found in about one minute:
>
http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Protocols/DNS/Service_Providers/Dynamic_DNS/
Thank you, that is a useful list.
However, that
On 04/13/2014 12:08 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Thank you, that is a useful list.
> However, that is not what I was asking -
> I was asking if it is feasible to set up one's own "dyndns".
I haven't tried that yet, but there are many howtos on the net, for
example: http://andrwe.org/linux/own-ddns
KevinO wrote:
>> I would like the server with a dynamic IP address
>> to be accessible through a fixed name.
>>
> Setup an authoritative DNS server on the server that has a fixed IP
> address to host records for the site(s) on the server that has a dynamic
> IP address.
>
> Create a local scheme
On 13.04.2014 10:37, Chris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently using Flash Player 11,2,202,346. The most recent version
> is 11.2.202.350. The package is from rpmforge. When will be there an
> update?
I'm on 11.2.202.350, flash-plugin from Adobe's repo.
http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adob
On 04/13/2014 12:48 PM, Nux! wrote:
> I'm on 11.2.202.350, flash-plugin from Adobe's repo.
>
> http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
Thank you. Now, I've added priorities to my yum repos:
priority = 1 [base]
priority = 1 [extras]
priority = 1 [rpmfusion-no
If you are interested in DIY you could just run your own dns server
(refer to [0]) on your server (the one with the static ip address) and
implement dyndns with your own domain.
[0] http://doc.powerdns.com/html/rfc2136-howto.html#rfc2136-howto-powerdns
Regards,
Armin Fisslthaler
signature.a
On 13/04/14 11:58, Chris wrote:
> On 04/13/2014 12:48 PM, Nux! wrote:
>> I'm on 11.2.202.350, flash-plugin from Adobe's repo.
>>
>> http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
>
> Thank you. Now, I've added priorities to my yum repos:
>
> priority = 1 [base]
> pr
Timothy Murphy writes:
>
> KevinO wrote:
>
> >> I would like the server with a dynamic IP address
> >> to be accessible through a fixed name.
> >>
> > Setup an authoritative DNS server on the server that has a fixed IP
> > address to host records for the site(s) on the server that has a dynami
On 04/13/2014 02:02 PM, Jake Shipton wrote:
> The lower the priority number, the higher it's priority.
Thank you Jake. Now I've updated the repository files.
- Chris
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 02:06:42PM +, David G. Miller wrote:
> Be aware that the actual "owner" of the dynamic IP address is still
> authoritative for reverse look ups. This means that some uses of a system
> with a dynamic IP address are problematic (e.g., mail server) since the
> reverse lo
On 04/13/2014 03:16 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> But would this "home" DNS server provide records accessible to others?
> If in fact it is straightforward surely it must be set out
> explicitly somewhere?
>
Yes. But, you have to set the name server entry with your domain registration.
Requests for
I know I'm slightly OT here, asking about RHEL, but since Centos is now a
part of RH, I'm hoping I won't be summarily ejected.
I've seen several articles that listed Centos 6.x as vulnerable, but
DID NOT LIST RHEL 6.
I'd think that if Centos 6.x is vulnerable, then so would RHEL 6.x,
since Cent
On 13/04/14 08:59 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> I know I'm slightly OT here, asking about RHEL, but since Centos is now a
> part of RH, I'm hoping I won't be summarily ejected.
>
> I've seen several articles that listed Centos 6.x as vulnerable, but
> DID NOT LIST RHEL 6.
>
> I'd think that if Centos 6.
see https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0160
This issue did not affect the versions of openssl as shipped with Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 5, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 and earlier, Red
Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5 and 6, and Red Hat JBoss
Web Server 1 and 2. This issue do
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> But would this "home" DNS server provide records accessible to others?
Be aware of DND DDoS Amplification attack *[0]* if you are running this
DNS at home as it can quickly deplete your bandwidth (if your ISP gives
you quotas per month). I use the following *[1]* to help
On 2014-04-14, Anthony K wrote:
>
> Be aware of DND DDoS Amplification attack *[0]* if you are running this
> DNS at home as it can quickly deplete your bandwidth (if your ISP gives
> you quotas per month). I use the following *[1]* to help stop these
> queries. However, since I'm dropping the
On 04/06/2014 02:09 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> I have some very large constantly updated mbox
> files
I don't know a tool to compact them, but I would consider converting
them to Maildir. Although they won't need less space, handling them will
be easier.
- Chris
__
On 14/04/14 14:18, Keith Keller wrote:
> ...well, unless they get to charge you by the MB/GB. Last I heard that
> was more common outside the US.
Yup, I'm in Australia and here they have a quota that counts up for both
downloads and uploads. We are actually getting DDoS'd at the office and
the
On 2014-04-14, Chris wrote:
> On 04/06/2014 02:09 PM, Rafa?? Radecki wrote:
>> I have some very large constantly updated mbox
>> files
>
> I don't know a tool to compact them, but I would consider converting
> them to Maildir. Although they won't need less space, handling them will
> be easier.
I
On Apr 13, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Keith Keller
wrote:
>
> In the context of the OP, when mutt tries to deal with a message (e.g.,
> deleting, moving to a folder), it can be boatloads faster, since
> handling the message works on a small file which contains just that
> message. Deleting a message f
On 4/13/2014 10:41 PM, Russell Miller wrote:
> HOWEVER. When a directory grows too large, the OS can take a long time to
> seek through the directory, which can cause its own set of problems. And
> this makes cleaning out a maildir directory selectively a real pain. Maildir
> really could do
22 matches
Mail list logo
