On 2014-04-08, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> Earlier in the day today, we were made aware of a serious
> issue in openssl as shipped in CentOS-6.5 ( including updates issued
> since CentOS-6.5 was released ); This issue is addressed in detail at
> http://heartbleed.com/
So it looks like new packages
The raid10 name is very misleading. I came to the same conclusion
yesterday: for sake of clarity I will make two raid1 arrays and combine
them into a raid0 ;)
Thanks for all info.
BR,
Rafal.
2014-04-08 8:49 GMT+02:00 Christopher Chan :
> On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 03:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote
On 4/8/2014 12:35 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> The raid10 name is very misleading. I came to the same conclusion
> yesterday: for sake of clarity I will make two raid1 arrays and combine
> them into a raid0;)
>
> Thanks for all info.
its striped mirrors, its just that it treats it all as one big rai
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Keith Keller <
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> On 2014-04-08, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > Earlier in the day today, we were made aware of a serious
> > issue in openssl as shipped in CentOS-6.5 ( including updates issued
> > since CentOS-6.5 was rele
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
> Message: 23
> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 07:08:30 -0400
> From: Steven Tardy
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2014-0160 CentOS 6 openssl heartbleed
> workaround
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Keith
Hi, All.
When I try to install php-redis, there are obvious 4 package hit the depedency.
One have already INSTALLED as follow.
I've GOOGLED, NOTHING help.
How can I get over this? Please Help, Thank you!
-- Sunshare
-- 2014-04-08
--
Hi!
Add exclude=php55* to /etc/yum.repos.d/centalt.repo
There are problems regarding php55 dependencies in centalt repo.
2014-04-08 15:26 GMT+03:00 sunshareall0709 :
> Hi, All.
> When I try to install php-redis, there are obvious 4 package hit the
> depedency.
> One have already INSTALLED as f
On 8 April 2014 12:08, Steven Tardy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Keith Keller <
> kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
>
> > On 2014-04-08, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > >
> > > Earlier in the day today, we were made aware of a serious
> > > issue in openssl as shipped in CentOS-6.
Am 08.04.2014 um 15:02 schrieb James Hogarth :
> On 8 April 2014 12:08, Steven Tardy wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Keith Keller <
>> kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-04-08, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> is there an easy way to know which services need to
On 07/04/14 17:31, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> On 06/04/14 13:32, Ned Slider wrote:
>>> On 05/04/14 19:28, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ELRepo does have a kmod-asix driver for el6, but it was backported from
>>> kernel-3.2 and does not support t
Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by
the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl,
is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what
implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to vi
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:11:32AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by
> the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl,
> is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what
>
On 2014-04-08, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> Tomcat, apache httpd, postfix, postgresl, mysql... best just to restart any
> network facing application that has SSL enabled ;)
Actually, I should have been more thorough: I am also interested in
knowing which credentials were vulnerable, so I can set poli
On 08.04.2014 16:32, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A quick Gnome question that has vexed me.
System -> Startup Applications -> Options
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
Hello everyone,
A quick Gnome question that has vexed me.
In CentOS 5.10, if I have, say, an X terminal window up on my screen,
the next time I log in, it's there when I log in as an unprivileged user.
That's because I can save the layout the way I want to; there's a checkbox
for it to save the
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A quick Gnome question that has vexed me.
>
> In CentOS 5.10, if I have, say, an X terminal window up on my screen,
> the next time I log in, it's there when I log in as an unprivileged user.
> That's because I can save the layout the way I want to; the
In article ,
Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 08.04.2014 um 15:02 schrieb James Hogarth :
> > On 8 April 2014 12:08, Steven Tardy wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Keith Keller <
> >> kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2014-04-08, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
Le 08/04/2014 19:05, Tony Mountifield a écrit :
> And I notice that the new libraries after applying the update are
> STILL called 1.0.1e - is that correct? Could be confusing.
Because at this time, it's only a workaround that disable certain
services, not a fix to the libraries, as I read in the
On 04/08/2014 01:12 PM, Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 08/04/2014 19:05, Tony Mountifield a écrit :
>> And I notice that the new libraries after applying the update are
>> STILL called 1.0.1e - is that correct? Could be confusing.
> Because at this time, it's only a workaround that disable certain
> servic
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 19:12 +0200, Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 08/04/2014 19:05, Tony Mountifield a écrit :
> > And I notice that the new libraries after applying the update are
> > STILL called 1.0.1e - is that correct? Could be confusing.
>
> Because at this time, it's only a workaround that disable
On 04/08/2014 10:37 AM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> If you: rpm -qa | grep openssl
>
> If you have: openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4.0.1
>
> You have the package with affected elements disabled. These were made
> until the final fixes could be brought in and applied.
>
> If you have: openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7
>
>
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:03:50 -0700
Lists wrote:
> What packages do I look for on EL5.X?
You don't. The bug doesn't affect el5.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 12:08 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:03:50 -0700
> Lists wrote:
>
> > What packages do I look for on EL5.X?
>
> You don't. The bug doesn't affect el5.
>
Frank is correct.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084875#c9
The above link has the info
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 08.04.2014 um 15:02 schrieb James Hogarth :
>> On 8 April 2014 12:08, Steven Tardy wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Keith Keller <
>>> kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
>>>
On 2014-04-08, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
On 08 April 2014 @00:34 zulu, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:27:17 -0400
> H wrote:
>
>> rpm --rebuilddb:
>>
>> rpmdb: unable to join the environment
> When I run that error message through google, this is the very first result:
>
> http://sysadmingear.blogspot.ca/2008/08/how-to-fix-rpmd
On 04/05/2014 08:46 PM, H wrote:
> I am running CentOS 6.5 in a VZ container and today when I wanted to run
> yum update command I receive the following error messages:
>
> rpmdb: unable to join the environment
> error: db3 error(11) from dbenv->open: Resource temporarily unavailable
> error: c
This is the best collection of minds I can think of on this topic, that's why it
is on this list. I think it is too subjective for stackoverflow.
So here is the problem:
The community center has multiple computers for the children (and adult
students) to use. These computer are always donated and
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> This is the best collection of minds I can think of on this topic, that's
> why it is on this list. I think it is too subjective for stackoverflow.
>
> So here is the problem:
>
> The community center has multiple computers for the children (and adult
> students) to use. These
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 3:21 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] PXE Boot / image server for non-profit's computers
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> This is t
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> This is the best collection of minds I can think of on this topic, that's why
> it
> is on this list. I think it is too subjective for stackoverflow.
>
> So here is the problem:
>
> The community center has multiple computers for the children
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> This is the best collection of minds I can think of on this topic, that's why
> it
> is on this list. I think it is too subjective for stackoverflow.
>
> So here is the problem:
>
> The community center has multiple computers for the children
On 2014-04-08, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> if you include libcrypto in the grep then sshd is affected.
That's unfortunate. :( Is the bug in libssl, libcrypto, or both?
Since sshd is in doubt, I would like to force my users to change their
password, which is stored on a central openldap server
Hi,
What else needs to be restarted ?
Anything reported by the lsof commands above ?
Thank you,
I.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
> > Am 08.04.2014 um 15:02 schrieb James Hogarth :
> >> On 8 April 2014 12:08,
If it's of any interest, I finally solved the trac problem. Turns out you
have to be granted TRAC_ADMIN to see/use the admin menus... but what is
*not* suggested in anything I read is that, for those of us who might be
ssh'ing into a server, and using organization-wide authentication, rather
than /
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Keith Keller
wrote:
> On 2014-04-08, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>
>> if you include libcrypto in the grep then sshd is affected.
>
> That's unfortunate. :( Is the bug in libssl, libcrypto, or both?
>
> Since sshd is in doubt, I would like to force my users to chan
Am 08.04.2014 um 23:08 schrieb Keith Keller
:
> On 2014-04-08, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>
>> if you include libcrypto in the grep then sshd is affected.
>
> That's unfortunate. :( Is the bug in libssl, libcrypto, or both?
looking inside - its seems that this issue (cve-2014-0160) is resolv
Thank you. I have now rebuilt the database and also secured the server against
the heartbleed bug. I do wonder, however, why the rpm database crashed? It
completed the last yum update just fine.
On April 8, 2014 2:46:59 PM EDT, Darr247 wrote:
>On 08 April 2014 @00:34 zulu, Frank Cox wrote:
>> O
On 2014-04-08, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
> looking inside - its seems that this issue (cve-2014-0160) is resolved
> in ssl/d1_both.c and ssl/t1_lib.c and not in files under crypto/ ...
> to say more i have to take a look into the build process.
So if it turns out to be true that the bug is in libssl
Leon Fauster writes:
> Am 08.04.2014 um 23:08 schrieb Keith Keller
> :
> > On 2014-04-08, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >>
> >> if you include libcrypto in the grep then sshd is affected.
> >
> > That's unfortunate. :( Is the bug in libssl, libcrypto, or both?
>
>
> looking inside - its seems
Hi!
Thanks for your response!
As you said, I've add exclude=php55* to /etc/yum.repos.d/centalt.repo, and
install again:
--
[sunshare@sunshare ~]$ sudo yum install php-redis
THANK YOU!
This DO help.
cd ~
wget -c
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/php-redis-2.2.2-5.git6f7087f.el6.x86_64.rpm
sudo yum -y install ~/php-redis-2.2.2-5.git6f7087f.el6.
Hi all,
I have a problem with logrotate and I don't know why. In
/var/log/messages appears these errors:
Apr 8 15:01:01 plzfnsm02 logrotate: ALERT exited abnormally with [1]
Apr 8 16:01:01 plzfnsm02 logrotate: ALERT exited abnormally with [1]
Apr 8 17:01:01 plzfnsm02 logrotate: ALERT exited a
43 matches
Mail list logo
