Re: [CentOS] HDD Problem....

Yeah Michael, I've tried to use the /mount/dev/sd* and it appears to workbecause I don't get any error messages...but I still can't "browse" to the drive in the Nautilus file managerso something's still not right. EGO II On 04/07/2014 02:07 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] HDD Problem....

While I haven't had a chance to attach it internally, that is going to be my next move.. EGO II On 04/06/2014 06:36 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: > >> Generally it's better to connect the bare metal drive to an internal SATA >> con

Re: [CentOS] HDD Problem....

Thanks Mark!..will be giving this a try along with all the other solutions.I mean SOMETHING'S got to give! EGO II On 04/05/2014 08:00 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 04/05/14 14:41, Eddie O'Connor wrote: >> Ok so I have a 500GB WD "Blue Scorpion" HDD that I'm trying to access via

Re: [CentOS] HDD Problem....

Thanks Keith...going to go this route firstsee what results I get. EGO II On 04/05/2014 07:46 PM, Edward M wrote: > On 4/5/2014 4:28 PM, Keith Keller wrote: >> On 2014-04-05, Eddie O'Connor wrote: >>> Ok so I have a 500GB WD "Blue Scorpion" HDD that I'm trying to access via >>> USB

Re: [CentOS] HDD Problem....

Hi Eddie, Monday, April 7, 2014, 10:43:16 AM, you wrote: > Yeah Michael, I've tried to use the /mount/dev/sd* and it appears to > workbecause I don't get any error messages...but I still can't > "browse" to the drive in the Nautilus file managerso something's > still not right. yo

Re: [CentOS] {CentOS} HDD Problem....

From: Eddie O'Connor > Okso after installing "smartmontools" on my CentOS machine...and > connectiing this drive externally...i got positive reports from both the > short and long tests...so the drive can obviously be "seen"but > when I > look for it in the /dev/ directory...it doesn't s

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 4

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:0356 CentOS 6 rrdtool FASTTRACK Update

On 04/03/2014 06:22 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0356 > > Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0356.html > > The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) > > i386: >

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:0356 CentOS 6 rrdtool FASTTRACK Update

On 04/07/2014 02:23 PM, MeasureMyEnergy - Tim D'Cruz wrote: > Has anybody seen these updated rrdtool RPMS on the mirrors yet, I have > checked a couple and can not find them? Yes, in the fasttrack folder. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk __

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:0356 CentOS 6 rrdtool FASTTRACK Update

On 04/07/2014 01:26 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 04/07/2014 02:23 PM, MeasureMyEnergy - Tim D'Cruz wrote: >> Has anybody seen these updated rrdtool RPMS on the mirrors yet, I have >> checked a couple and can not find them? > > Yes, in the fasttrack folder. Thanks Mogens, much appreciated. regards

Re: [CentOS] chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6

Is this legit? Anyone try this build? On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, ngeorgop wrote: > *New version of chromium (33.0.1750.152)*Build by me :-)i686 > chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.i686.rpm > SRPM > chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.sr

Re: [CentOS] chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6

On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > Is this legit? Anyone try this build? > It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0 ... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.: http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/ There are custom patches in the source code that I have not co

Re: [CentOS] HDD Problem....

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: > >> Generally it's better to connect the bare metal drive to an internal SATA >> connection to run smartctl. If the short test results are good, run. The >> long test. There are > > >

Re: [CentOS] Problem running yum update command

Just tried yum clean all but receive exactly the same error message: rpmdb: unable to join the environment error: db3 error(11) from dbenv->open: Resource temporarily unavailable error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Resource temporarily unavailable (11) error: cannot open Packages databa

Re: [CentOS] Problem running yum update command

On 04/07/2014 05:51 PM, H wrote: > Just tried yum clean all but receive exactly the same error message: > > rpmdb: unable to join the environment > error: db3 error(11) from dbenv->open: Resource temporarily unavailable > error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Resource temporarily > unavai

Re: [CentOS] {CentOS} HDD Problem....

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:05 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: Eddie O'Connor > > > Okso after installing "smartmontools" on my CentOS machine...and > > connectiing this drive externally...i got positive reports from both the > > short and long tests...so the drive can obviously be "seen"but >

Re: [CentOS] USB 3.0 NIC / Sitecom NL-031

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 06/04/14 13:32, Ned Slider wrote: > > On 05/04/14 19:28, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > > > > > ELRepo does have a kmod-asix driver for el6, but it was backported from > > kernel-3.2 and does not support this device. > > > > This is a newer USB3 dev

[CentOS] Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

Hi All. I have a server which uses RAID10 made of 4 partitions for / and boots from it. It looks like so: mdadm -D /dev/md1 /dev/md1: Version : 00.90 Creation Time : Mon Apr 27 09:25:05 2009 Raid Level : raid10 Array Size : 973827968 (928.71 GiB 997.20 GB) Used Dev Size : 48

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

On 4/7/2014 12:47 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote: > As far as I know raid10 is ~ "a raid0 built on top of two raid1" ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels#RAID_1.2B0 - raid10). So I > think that by default in my case: > > /dev/sda6 and /dev/sdb6 form the first "raid1" > /dev/sdd6 and /dev/s

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

On 2014-04-07, Rafa? Radecki wrote: > I would really appreciate a definite answer which partitions I can remove > and which I cannot remove at the same time because I need to perform some > disk maintenance tasks on this raid10 array. Thanks for all help! You're likely to get the most definitive

Re: [CentOS] Problem running yum update command

On 04/07/14 12:01 pm, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > On 04/07/2014 05:51 PM, H wrote: >> Just tried yum clean all but receive exactly the same error message: >> >> rpmdb: unable to join the environment >> error: db3 error(11) from dbenv->open: Resource temporarily unavailable >> error: cannot open

Re: [CentOS] Problem running yum update command

On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:27:17 -0400 H wrote: > rpm --rebuilddb: > > rpmdb: unable to join the environment When I run that error message through google, this is the very first result: http://sysadmingear.blogspot.ca/2008/08/how-to-fix-rpmdb-unable-to-join.html -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Di

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CVE-2014-0160 CentOS 6 openssl heartbleed workaround

Thank you. What will the temporary packages be called ? -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Centos. No Micro$oft Windoze here. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CVE-2014-0160 CentOS 6 openssl heartbleed workaround

On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 03:30 +0100, Always Learning wrote: > Thank you. > > What will the temporary packages be called ?# I've answered my own question: openssl* -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Centos. No Micro$oft Windoze here. ___

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 03:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote: > As far as I know raid10 is ~ "a raid0 built on top of two raid1" ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels#RAID_1.2B0 - raid10). So I > think that by default in my case: No, Linux md raid10 is NOT a nested raid setup where you bu