hi,
i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more
complicated then i thought.
the sources was:
- Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/
unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm
- rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.
Le 05/03/2014 10:35, Farkas Levente a écrit :
> hi,
> i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more
> complicated then i thought.
>
> the sources was:
> - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29
>http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/
>unfortunately the link disappear a few d
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
> >
> Are you saying the gmail interface
>> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
>> > Mark,
>> >
>> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
>> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>> >
>> Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where
>> you
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:43 AM, zGreenfelder wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
> >> > Mark,
> >> >
> >> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> >> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
> >> >
> >> Are you saying
Hello list
A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it.
My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions
are in raid1 and I successfully removed them.
The partition in swap cant removed because is probably active.
How can I stop swap and remove partition?
After rep
On 03/05/2014 02:55 PM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
> Hello list
> A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it.
> My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions
> are in raid1 and I successfully removed them.
> The partition in swap cant removed because is proba
From: Nikos Gatsis - Qbit
> How can I stop swap and remove partition?
> After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again?
# apropos swap | grep '(8)'
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin
On 5/3/2014 3:59 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 05.03.2014 14:55, schrieb Nikos Gatsis - Qbit:
>> A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it.
>> My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions
>> are in raid1 and I successfully removed them.
>> The partition in s
On Tue, March 4, 2014 19:00, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Mark,
>
> My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>
> Respectfully --Kenny
>
>
The top-post controversy B.S. is an affectation of the technocratii. Most
business c
On 05.03.2014 15:31, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
>
> On 5/3/2014 3:59 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 05.03.2014 14:55, schrieb Nikos Gatsis - Qbit:
>>> A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it.
>>> My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions
>>> are in raid1
CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download CENTOS 5.X
version.
Can anyone point me to the location?
Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 05/03/14 10:10 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download CENTOS
> 5.X version.
> Can anyone point me to the location?
>
> Thanks.
http://vault.centos.org/
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is t
On 5 March 2014 10:10, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download
> CENTOS 5.X version.
> Can anyone point me to the location?
>
> Thanks.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.cento
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2014 07:56 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in
> enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it "just
> work" out of the box?
>
> (I'll get around t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2014 07:56 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in
> enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it "just
> work" out of the box?
>
> (I'll get around t
Kenny Noe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:43 AM, zGreenfelder
> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
>> >> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>> >> >
>> >> Ar
From: mcclnx mcc
> CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download CENTOS
> 5.X
> version.
> Can anyone point me to the location?
On the CentOS homepage, click on "Get CentOS Linux Now".
Then click on the "alternative downloads" link...
JD
On 03/05/2014 03:43 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Le 05/03/2014 10:35, Farkas Levente a écrit :
>> hi,
>> i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more
>> complicated then i thought.
>>
>> the sources was:
>> - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29
>>http://dev.centos.org/ce
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Does
> setsebool -P zebra_write_conf 1
>
> Fix your problem?
>
So far I ran:
setsebool -P allow_zebra_write_config=1
( per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429252#c1 )
I'll ru
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> man zebra_selinux
> ...
>If you want to allow zebra daemon to write it configuration files, you
>must turn on the zebra_write_config boolean. Disabled by default.
>
>setsebool -P zebra_write_config 1
Is there some
On 03/05/2014 10:43 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Le 05/03/2014 10:35, Farkas Levente a écrit :
>> hi,
>> i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more
>> complicated then i thought.
>>
>> the sources was:
>> - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29
>>http://dev.centos.org/ce
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
see the updated source file here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/
Where
On 03/06/2014 10:19 AM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
> see the updated source file here:
> http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
>
> But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
> h
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:19:26 -0700
Michael Coffman wrote:
> Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4?
"yum update" should bring your system up to the current Centos release which
includes the gnutls fix.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
_
On 3/5/2014 1:19 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
> see the updated source file here:
> http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
>
> But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
> http:
On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote:
> I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
> see the updated source file here:
> http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
>
> But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
> http:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
> >
> Since I've never used gmail (and refuse to ever do so), I don't know the
> interface... other that to note that *all* webmail ranges from "mostly
> useable" (I'm using squirrelmail here at work for my own account) to
> utterly lousy (i.e., Lookout, er,
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> Since I've never used gmail (and refuse to ever do so), I don't know the
>> interface... other that to note that *all* webmail ranges from "mostly
>> useable" (I'm using squirrelmail here at work for my own account) to
>> utterl
This question is related to Centos 6.4 running on workstations with dual
monitors attached using Nvidia drivers, twinview mode.
We've gotten stuck on a window manager specific issue with getting
'vncviewer' (tigervnc) to go full screen to both monitors.
If Gnome is the window manager, we have no
Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote:
> > I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?
> I
> > see the updated source file here:
> > htt
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:58 PM, wrote:
> >>
>> Heh. If you use gmail's web interface, you don't even care about how
>> someone responds. It will automatically hide the parts you've already
>> seen, regardless of how they are quoted or whether they are
>> above/below the new parts. It replaces
On 3/5/2014 3:22 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
what? why???
yum update gnutls
*done*
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
__
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
> Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
Why? 'yum update gnutls' will get it, bringing along only things
specified as having version-specific dependencies if there are any.
But it is generally a bad idea to let the res
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
same rev with all the same packages. A large number of vendor packages
and interna
On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
> locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
> hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
> same rev with all the same packa
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> > Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
> > locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
> > hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and H
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
>>>
>> so you're a year behind on any security fixes why are you worried
>> about this one, then?
>>
>
>
> This seems like it has more potentiol to impact users in my environment
> that are using a web browser to access sites outside our f
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman
> > updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no
> > more updates. Now I know so thanks...
>
> No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yu
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Harris"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 4:43:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman
> > > updated.
On 2014-03-05, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 02:55 PM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
>
>> After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again?
>
> swapon -a
You'll probably also need to remake the swap space before doing swapon:
mkswap /path/to/md/swap/device
--keith
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>>
>> No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows
>> how to get them, even selectively.
>
> More to the point, "6.4" and "6.5" are just markers in the sand for
> "CentOS 6". 6.5 is basically just a rebasing of the pac
Before you update anything, I suggest you run
rpm -e --test gnutls
If this complains about "refers to more than one package" then use
rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64
This will tell you what other packages depend on the gnutls library.
It's probably fewer than you think, because RHEL/Cen
I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression
testing of applications or because a third party package vendor specifies a
part
45 matches
Mail list logo
