[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 5

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] bind (named) compromised?

On 09.02.2014 04:19, James Pifer wrote: > I'm having problems where my upstream bandwidth is being saturated. > I've > narrowed it down to a DNS issue of some type. If I stop the named > service then my bandwidth drops to "normal" according to my untangle > firewall. Your dns server may be used i

Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN problem

Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> I'm having problems communicating with a remote server, with openvpn. > > First, did you check that it works fine without OpenVPN (e.g. firewall > open)? > Second, what exactly are you doing/do you want to achieve? > VPN makes sense if you go thru a triangle (client -> netw

Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN problem

Timothy Murphy wrote > Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > >>> I'm having problems communicating with a remote server, with openvpn. >>> >> {snip} >> Second, what exactly are you doing/do you want to achieve? >> VPN makes sense if you go thru a triangle (client -> network a -> network >> b, wher

Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN problem

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:14:12 + Ken Smith wrote: > Its down to the question about what you are needing to do. If you > just need SSH access then SSH direct without VPN is just fine. SSH > itself is encrypted and the VPN just encrypts the already encrypted > traffic again and just slows things d

Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN problem

Ken Smith wrote: >> But I am genuinely interested in the best way to use OpenVPN. >> All the documents I looked at online spent their time >> explaining at inordinate length how to setup OpenVPN. >> If anyone knows of a site with a simple explanation >> of how to use OpenVPN (preferably with the

Re: [CentOS] bind (named) compromised?

Hi James, you seem to be running an open DNS resolver, is that correct? And if so, do you do it intentionally? I just received an US-CERT alert today that warns about ongoing amplification attacks, among others against DNS, but also against some other UDP based services.

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Sure, we talked to them (redhat). That does not make the code actually > build any faster. > > The code does not build (as is) on EL6 and each build needs to be > troubleshot and error corrected to make it work. > > Currently there are seve

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

Sorry for this being off topic but I feel it emphasizes the need for long term support for desktop browsers on Linux. Went hunting for any info on Opera for Linux. My assumptions seem to be correct about Opera. I have no proof this is a legit post but it sounds like the truth: "At my previous e

Re: [CentOS] openswan and ipsec

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/2014 11:05 PM, Markus Falb wrote: > # ipsec verify ... If you encounter network related SElinux errors, > especially when using KLIPS, try disabling SElinux ... > > Well, it is not running KLIPS but netkey, anyways I feel not comfortable > ab

Re: [CentOS] bind (named) compromised?

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Peter Eckel wrote: > Hi James, > > you seem to be running an open DNS resolver, is that correct? And if so, > do you do it intentionally? > Nux! and Peter are almost certainly correct. If the OP was to run tcpdump with the -A flag on the external/public-facing in

[CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

Ok so I built the microserver as a centos box and now I have a strange one I built a Centos 6.5 box with a 3.6 raid ext4 data drive on it, shared with samba. Now when I browse these folders on the console I can see the files. when I sftp on the command line from another box I can see these files

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:46 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > Ok so I built the microserver as a centos box and now I have a strange one > > I built a Centos 6.5 box with a 3.6 raid ext4 data drive on it, shared > with samba. > > Now when I browse these folders on the console I can see the files. wh

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

I've set myself as the owner and the permissions to 777 On 10 February 2014 14:08, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:46 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > > Ok so I built the microserver as a centos box and now I have a strange > one > > > > I built a Centos 6.5 box with a 3.6 raid

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b. On 10 February 2014 14:11, Jeff Allison wrote: > I've set myself as the owner and the permissions to 777 > > > On 10 February 2014 14:08, Always Learning wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some > folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b. Could there be a predetermined limit on the quantity of displayed entries or a buffer-full problem ?

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

Possibly, but I've moved a file from inside a folder to the top level and it still doesn't show. It's a 700G folder though. On 10 February 2014 14:25, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > > > The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some > folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b. On a filter on last date used/accessed ? -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linu

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

Seems to be still alphabetical On 10 February 2014 14:29, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > > > The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some > > folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b. > > On a

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:37 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > Seems to be still alphabetical Regret I don't know. Hopefully the others may have a solution. What software gives the truncated results ? -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here. _

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

samba / gui sftp client. Commanline sftp gives the right response. On 10 February 2014 14:52, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:37 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > > > Seems to be still alphabetical > > Regret I don't know. Hopefully the others may have a solution. > > What softw

[CentOS] [OT] Video card radiator

I recently obtained a desktop computer with an nVidia video card: from lspci: 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT] (rev a1 I had to open the case to connect the DVD drive and saw what appears to be a fallen radiator: http://www.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/com

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:56 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > samba / gui sftp client. > > Commanline sftp gives the right response. Perhaps a bug or a configuration limitation. I use filezilla with SFTP. Never had a problem. When I left Windoze 4 or 5 years ago, I took essential data to Centos an

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

Perhaps it's time to generate nfs shares and see how that goes. On 10 February 2014 15:08, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:56 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > > > samba / gui sftp client. > > > > Commanline sftp gives the right response. > > Perhaps a bug or a configuration limi

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:12 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > Perhaps it's time to generate nfs shares and see how that goes. I'd be interested in your progress implementing NFS (version 4?) and how it compares to Samba. -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Win

Re: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue

Seems to work fine in nfs, a bit slower though. On 10 February 2014 15:19, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:12 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote: > > > Perhaps it's time to generate nfs shares and see how that goes. > > I'd be interested in your progress implementing NFS (version 4?)