On 02/07/2014 11:47 PM, Matt wrote:
> Having a
> single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think.
This depends upon how the RAID is set up.
A standard Linux RAID1 setup does not give better reading
performance when reading large files than a single disk.
I don't know if the RAID system is cl
On 01/12/2014 02:51 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Hi.
I just wanted to notify all that I found very nice GUI SSH client at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pacmanager/
It has rpm packages and works very nice. Multi-tab, Expact support,
connections tree, connection , user and password saving (I
Am 06.02.2014 um 17:41 schrieb "Phelps, Matt" :
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Fabian Arrotin
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian
>> wrote:
>>>
>> http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.htm
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> here's a WD20EZRX,
>> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71hgUgJ0CQL._SL1500_.jpg
>>
>> looks pretty normal to me.
>
> That picture shows the WD drive above that I have.
> As you see, there is an empty (and slightly smaller) "slot"
> between the SATA connectors and th
Timothy Murphy wrote on Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:40:24 +:
> As you see, there is an empty (and slightly smaller) "slot"
> between the SATA connectors and the power connector.
That "power connector" is a jumper bay. As Miguel explains the two "L-
shaped" things are what gets used for SATA (the shor
Miguel Medalha wrote:
> The WD is a SATA3 drive (6gb/s). Are you sure that your motherboard
> supports SATA3 drives? Maybe SOME ports support them while others do
> not? If not, can you force the WD to operate in a lower mode? Some
> drives can, either by hardware or software.
Thank you very much
On 02/08/2014 11:51 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 01/12/2014 02:51 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I just wanted to notify all that I found very nice GUI SSH client at
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/pacmanager/
>>
>> It has rpm packages and works very nice. Multi-tab, Expact support,
>
I'm having problems communicating with a remote server, with openvpn.
I can link with ssh ok, but the link stalls when viewing
any but the smallest texts.
I tried reducing the tun0 MTU, though only from 1500 to 1400,
but this seemed to have no effect.
Before trying a larger reduction, I'd like to
On 08 February 2014 @13:28 zulu, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
>> The WD is a SATA3 drive (6gb/s). Are you sure that your motherboard
>> supports SATA3 drives? Maybe SOME ports support them while others do
>> not? If not, can you force the WD to operate in a lower mode? Some
>> dr
Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:28:18 +:
> I had better check if these do support SATA3 drives.
That jumper bay usually allows for setting to slower speeds. There should
have been a small leaflet with the drive explaining it.
Kai
___
Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:50:07 +:
> I'm having problems communicating with a remote server, with openvpn.
First, did you check that it works fine without OpenVPN (e.g. firewall
open)?
Second, what exactly are you doing/do you want to achieve?
VPN makes sense if you go thr
On 02/05/2014 04:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> Use Software Collections. There's a newer perl inside software
>> collections, that contains a newer version of Encode for this and will
>> meet your dependencies. There still isn't an rpm based ins
On 02/07/2014 01:53 AM, Nicole Hähnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build several SCL perl516 modules for using assp spamfilter.
> Some modules have dependencies which spend a lot of errors or can not be
> build on a x86_64 system.
> perl-Email-Valid-0.184 for example needs Win32::IPHelper and
>
With some SATA drives the mode change can only be done by a software utility.
Some of them don't have jumpers at all.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/08/2014 06:12 AM, Darr247 wrote:
> On 07 February 2014 @06:45 zulu, Cliff Pratt wrote:
>> Darr247, that is verging on the bizarre! Why on earth... The only reason I
>> can think of doing that is "because it was there".
>>
>
> Because I couldn't find a GUI hasher in the stock repos (gHasher is
The server's manual recommends filling the drive bays in the 1,2,3,4 order.
At this point, you should check the HP support page for the server, Look for
controller firmware updates, BIOS updates, troubleshooting advice and so on.
Did you try to connect the drive alone? If it is detected alone, yo
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>
>> Having a
>> single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think.
>
> This depends upon how the RAID is set up.
>
> A standard Linux RAID1 setup does not give better reading
> performance when reading large files than a single disk.
Maybe, i
On 08.Feb.2014, at 11:25, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 11:47 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Having a
>> single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think.
>
> This depends upon how the RAID is set up.
No, mdraid 1 is mdraid 1.
> A standard Linux RAID1 setup does not give better reading
> performa
Miguel Medalha wrote:
> Also, the drive itself can be defective. I once received two new WD high
> end drives that couldn't be detected by any controller and I had to return
> them. The new ones worked fine.
Thanks for all your help, and to the others who advised me.
I found that the drive work
On 02/08/2014 07:17 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
>
> On 08.Feb.2014, at 11:25, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>
>> On 02/07/2014 11:47 PM, Matt wrote:
>>> Having a
>>> single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think.
>>
>> This depends upon how the RAID is set up.
>
> No, mdraid 1 is mdraid 1.
>
>> A standard L
On 2/8/2014 6:13 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:28:18 +:
>
>> >I had better check if these do support SATA3 drives.
> That jumper bay usually allows for setting to slower speeds. There should
> have been a small leaflet with the drive explaining it.
Seaga
On Feb 8, 2014 1:41 AM, "Lists" wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2014 08:41 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> > Of course we already have notified Google.
> >
> > I was hoping for a little more granularity. Google is a large place; as
is
> > Red Hat I know. There was word that Red Hat was working with Google on a
> >
# ipsec verify
...
If you encounter network related SElinux errors, especially when using KLIPS,
try disabling SElinux
...
Well, it is not running KLIPS but netkey, anyways
I feel not comfortable about disabling selinux on a ipsec router.
I am not sure how to handle possible probems in this cas
OIC. The partial answer to that is that the command line programs in
general give you more control and often have more features. Often the GUI
programs are simply front ends to the command line ones. Command line ones
can be scripted. The usual GUI versus command line arguments.
Though if it is a
On 02/06/2014 10:41 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Fabian Arrotin
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian
>> wrote:
new potential remote code exploit in Chromium flash.
>> http://googlechromer
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 09:07 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> yum install centos-release-SCL
Works on C 6.5 but not on C 5.10
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
On 02/08/2014 04:45 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 09:07 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>
>> yum install centos-release-SCL
> Works on C 6.5 but not on C 5.10
>
>
right .. software collections is centos-6 only
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
I'm having problems where my upstream bandwidth is being saturated. I've
narrowed it down to a DNS issue of some type. If I stop the named
service then my bandwidth drops to "normal" according to my untangle
firewall.
I'm running bind-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.6.
I'm seeing the following in /var/log/m
28 matches
Mail list logo
