Re: [CentOS] Fwd: HA cluster - strange communication between nodes

2014/1/13 Martin Moravcik : > I'm sorry. > My systems are fully updated CentOS 6.5. > I'm using only standard centos repositories. > > martin > > On 13/01/14 15:17, Patrick Lists wrote: >> On 13-01-14 14:52, Martin Moravcik wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> For a testing purposes I'm trying to create two node

Re: [CentOS] - manipulation token error [SOLVED]

On Monday, January 13, 2014 01:33:27 AM John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/13/2014 1:14 AM, Paolo De Michele wrote: > > I am trying to log in with the root account via ssh > > errors before are using the root account > > > > you need to contact my provider to get me access through the console of > > the

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 107, Issue 7

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

[CentOS] Laptop recommendation

Hello, I am looking for a laptop with the following specs: Built-in GSM module Trusted platform module Support for these modules, as for the network (Ethernet + WiFi) for RHEL/Centos6. I tested Lenovo W540, and the WiFi is not detected. lspci shows: 03:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semicon

Re: [CentOS] Laptop recommendation

op 14-01-14 14:49, Todor Petkov schreef: > Hello, > > I am looking for a laptop with the following specs: > > Built-in GSM module > Trusted platform module > Support for these modules, as for the network (Ethernet + WiFi) for > RHEL/Centos6. > > > I tested Lenovo W540, and the WiFi is not detected

Re: [CentOS] Laptop recommendation

2014/1/14 Todor Petkov > Hello, > > I am looking for a laptop with the following specs: > > Built-in GSM module > Trusted platform module > Support for these modules, as for the network (Ethernet + WiFi) for > RHEL/Centos6. > > > I tested Lenovo W540, and the WiFi is not detected. lspci shows: >

Re: [CentOS] Need help with kernel, modules and headers

Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Patrick Begou > wrote: >> I need some help about kernels, modules and so on. >> >> I've installed CentOS6.5 (fresh install) on a DELL E7440 laptop. After all >> the >> updates I get the latest kernel: kernel-2.6.32-431. >> >> But with this conf

Re: [CentOS] Laptop recommendation

see this link http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops vlws 2014/1/14 Darod Zyree > 2014/1/14 Todor Petkov > > > Hello, > > > > I am looking for a laptop with the following specs: > > > > Built-in GSM module > > Trusted platform module > > Support for these modules, as for the network (Ethernet

Re: [CentOS] krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mahmoud wrote: > Hello, > > I download krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm< > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm > >from > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/. > > In

Re: [CentOS] apache - upload files bigger than 2Go

From: MOKRANI Rachid > I need to upload  files larger than 4.4Gb (iso DVD) on CentOS (5.5 x64) > http server (httpd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos)    Maybe try the answer there: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13574542/4gb-http-file-uploads-using-jquery-file-upload-apache-and-php JD _

Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?

From: Liam O'Toole > That sounds worrying. Could you elaborate, or provide a citation? Remember this? http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2013/12/09/serious-security-google-finds-fake-but-trusted-ssl-certificates-for-its-domains-made-in-france/ The whole SSL certificates system is not to be trusted

[CentOS] libapreq2

Is there no package for libapreq2 anymore? Im trying to get netdisco setup on a new centos 6.5 server and cant find any package that provides this module. ddh -- Dwayne Hottinger Network Administrator Harrisonburg City Public Schools ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm

On 01/13/2014 11:03 PM, Mahmoud wrote: > Hello, > > I download > krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpmfrom > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/. > > In Cenos 6.5, I us

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: HA cluster - strange communication between nodes

Hi Martin. if you could provide us your config like, put the output of the command below. pcs configure show or crm configure show maybe we could get a better idea of your setup. On 01/14/2014 06:34 PM, Giorgio Bersano wrote: > 2014/1/13 Martin Moravcik : >> I'm sorry. >> My systems are ful

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/13/2014 07:33, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > is there a CentOS > version of that beta? Not yet publicly available. I've heard they have something running in the development environment, but that they're still working on getting some of the RPMs to build. That's a prerequisite for generating IS

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > How bad is the worst case -- reinstall the OS and rebuild the software > -- anyway? By doing your initial work on the RHEL 7 beta, you learn > what you need to know to quickly redo the work on CentOS 7. Is there anything to simplify the pr

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7 - arm distro?

Since RH7 is built on Fedora 19 and f19 is available for arm boards, will we see a RH7 for arm boards? I would spend time on the beta if I could get an arm build for a reasonable arm board. Target application is a PBX. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

Warren Young wrote: > On 1/13/2014 07:33, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Reason for this: at one of my local sf clubs, I've been trying to install Evergreen, F/OSS library software, on a system, and it's a nightmare. >> They seem to have been building it for Ubuntu whateverthelatestanimalis. The >> bi

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> How bad is the worst case -- reinstall the OS and rebuild the software -- anyway? By doing your initial work on the RHEL 7 beta, you learn what you need to know to quickly redo the work on CentOS 7. > > Is there anyt

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 13:41, Les Mikesell wrote: > > It seems like taking the list from 'rpm -qa' on a > running machine and feeding it to 'yum install ' I suspect it's not actually that simple. I think you'd need to do a fair bit of processing on the rpm -qa list to be able to build a yum command t

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 14:32, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > configure can't > find the interface, Were you aware that RHEL 7 now uses "Consistent Network Device Naming" (http://goo.gl/Z0ydDF) in more situations? It was optional in RHEL 6 (http://goo.gl/TiuTP9) but is all but enforced in RHEL 7. Everyone,

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 14 January 2014 20:41, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Is there anything to simplify the process of duplicating the set of > installed packages when you didn't pay that much attention the first > time around? It seems like taking the list from 'rpm -qa' on a > running machine and feeding it to 'yum

[CentOS] thinking ahead... far ahead

I've been having a problem with motion on one server - the .avi's it produces are dark, low contrast, and it keeps resizing from 642x420 to 296x360 or some such. Trying to figure it out, I was just going through /var/log/dmesg, and found rtc0: alarms up to one year, y3k, 114 bytes nvram I mean, y3

Re: [CentOS] thinking ahead... far ahead

On 14/01/14 05:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I've been having a problem with motion on one server - the .avi's it > produces are dark, low contrast, and it keeps resizing from 642x420 to > 296x360 or some such. Trying to figure it out, I was just going through > /var/log/dmesg, and found > rtc0:

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On 1/14/2014 14:32, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > > configure can't > > find the interface, > > Were you aware that RHEL 7 now uses "Consistent Network Device Naming" > (http://goo.gl/Z0ydDF) in more situations? It was optional in R

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 01/15/2014 12:37 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: >> On 1/14/2014 14:32, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >>> configure can't >>> find the interface, >> >> Were you aware that RHEL 7 now uses "Consistent Network Device Naming" >> (http://goo.gl/

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 16:37, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Everyone, drop a tear for the dead "eth0".We will miss you, eth0! > > Haven't played much with it in CentOS. In Fedora, at present, it is a bit > of pain as both biosdevname and syste

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 17:33, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > " If the system's BIOS does not have SMBIOS version 2.6 or higher and > this data, the new naming convention will not be used. Apparently VirtualBox emulates SMBIOS, since my RHEL 7 VM uses this new scheme. _

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 5:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: > I don't know about "less consistent", but I always considered it a > feature in Linux vs the BSDs or big iron Unix that I could always count > on the first network interface being "eth0". BSD and big iron Unix > named the interface after the Ethernet dri

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I don't know about "less consistent", but I always considered it a > feature in Linux vs the BSDs or big iron Unix that I could always count > on the first network interface being "eth0". What does 'first' mean? And the same one isn't cons

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 01/15/2014 10:57 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On 1/14/2014 14:32, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Everyone, drop a tear for the dead "eth0".We will miss you, eth0! Not as dead as you may think, there are still situations where eth0 will be used, even by default: [root@el7-test ~]# ip a ... 2: et

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 01/15/2014 02:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I don't know about "less consistent", but I always considered it a > feature in Linux vs the BSDs or big iron Unix that I could always count > on the first network interface being "eth0". BSD and big iron Unix > named the interface after the Ethe

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 18:23, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/14/2014 5:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> I don't know about "less consistent", but I always considered it a >> feature in Linux vs the BSDs or big iron Unix that I could always count >> on the first network interface being "eth0". BSD and big iron Uni

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 2014-01-14 8:34 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: > Now I have to remember which *PCI slot* my Ethernet card is in when I > run "ifconfig" unless I want to dig through the full listing. > Yes, but that's something you _can_ know. > So... which PCI/P

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 5:55 PM, Warren Young wrote: > I know the problem you mean, but doesn't the HWADDR setting in the > ifcfg-ethX file fix the problem? Doesn't that force "ifup eth0" to bind > that file's settings to the right physical interface? > > In the old days, ifcfg-ethX didn't have HWADDR, so "f

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 18:34, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> > >> Now I have to remember which *PCI slot* my Ethernet card is in when I >> run "ifconfig" unless I want to dig through the full listing. > > Yes, but that's something you _can_ know. How much time

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Darr247 wrote: > On 2014-01-14 8:34 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> Now I have to remember which *PCI slot* my Ethernet card is in when I >> run "ifconfig" unless I want to dig through the full listing. >> Yes, bu

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 19:10, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/14/2014 5:55 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> I know the problem you mean, but doesn't the HWADDR setting in the >> ifcfg-ethX file fix the problem? Doesn't that force "ifup eth0" to bind >> that file's settings to the right physical interface? >> >> In th

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 18:34, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Puzzle for ya: What "PCI slot" is the Intel e1000e MAC chip in on a > Supermicro X9SCA-F motherboard? It isn't called out in the mobo manual. > I just looked. (For that matter, the actual PCI slots don't have > their numbers documented in the man

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > >>> Now I have to remember which *PCI slot* my Ethernet card is in when I >>> run "ifconfig" unless I want to dig through the full listing. >> >> Yes, but that's something you _can_ know. > > How much time and resources do you need to learn

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote: > >> Puzzle for ya: What "PCI slot" is the Intel e1000e MAC chip in on a >> Supermicro X9SCA-F motherboard? It isn't called out in the mobo manual. >> I just looked. (For that matter, the actual PCI slots don't have >> their numbers docum

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:35:06PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > Let anaconda figure it out. I don't care what it is, just that it is > repeatable. Awooga! Awoooga! Awooga! Here's the fun part; devices discovered by Anaconda may not match the devices disovered during the production boot. Devic

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: >> > Ultimately what we have is a situation similar to hard disks. We've got > used to sd devices changing depending on the order disks are discovered > in, which is why we use LABEL or UUID. But those don't work until something has already

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:54:33PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > Ultimately what we have is a situation similar to hard disks. We've got > > used to sd devices changing depending on the order disks are discovered > > in, which is why we u

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

On 1/14/2014 19:54, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > If you are old enough, you might remember unix versions that > named disks by controller, bus, target numbers. /dev/rdsk/c0t0n0q0w0e0p1k5n8 :) It's another reason I took to Linux quickly, rig

Re: [CentOS] krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm

Hello, Thank you for your time and attention. I changed %dist variable, for installation It will be conflicted with other required .el6_4 packages. Best regards. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/13/2014 11:03 PM, Mahmoud wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I download krb5-

[CentOS] Advice in Time Sync

Dear all, I would need some advice as I am a beginner in CentOS. The question is as follows: How to set up timing if NTP was block by ISP? I have try many way such as link the timezone , getting from the hardware clock.However , it is not the solution. Please advice. -- Regards, Ku Wei Xiong