On 8/1/2014 8:28 μμ, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The concept doesn't even make sense for TCP connections where the
> stack requires acks and sequencing. Are you trying to bridge to a
> capture device or something?
Thank you all for your enlightening feedback, which helped me better
understand my situ
On 01/09/2014 12:38 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi,
On 01/08/2014 02:47 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
One thing that struck me in Karanbir's message was the marketing
mumbo-jumbo such as "the next generation of emerging technologies" and
"a platform that is easily consumed".
Karanbir usually writ
Hello,
Default MySQL installation on CentOS sets /bin/bash as shell.
I'm on a user cleanup task where I want reduce unneeded privileges to users.
What is the "mysql" user shell for? (What will happen if I change it to
/bin/false or whatever would disable it's shell?)
It's not only a matter of S
Two weeks ago I reported a problem I was having in the CentOS 5 Security
Support forum. I could not get hash rounds, configured in /etc/libuser.conf, to
work on CentOS release 5.10 (Final), 2.6.18-371.3.1.el5 x86_64. The details are
here:
https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=44245&
op 19-12-13 12:38, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
> op 19-12-13 12:23, wwp schreef:
>> Hello Johan,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:08:17 +0100 Johan Vermeulen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble on 2 laptops Lenovo B580 since upgrading to Centos6.5.
>>> ( Because it's a Lenovo I can
From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> Default MySQL installation on CentOS sets /bin/bash as shell.
> I'm on a user cleanup task where I want reduce unneeded privileges to users.
Its password should be locked.
So you cannot login as mysql but you can "su - mysql" or run scripts as mysql.
I do not know
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Every now and again the nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf
on my CentOS-6.5 server are commented out.
I used to think this was the fault of NetworkManager,
but I've stopped running that on the server
(using the network service instead)
and the nameserver removal still occurs.
I'm baffled by the motiv
The DHCP client does similar things.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] Im Auftrag
von Timothy Murphy
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2014 13:28
An: centos@centos.org
Betreff: [CentOS] Who deletes/edits my resolv.com ?
Every now and
On 01/09/2014 12:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'd throw SMEserver, ClearOS, and the old (up to CentOS5) version of
> K12LTSP in that bucket too. Maybe someone will roll a new K12LTSP
> that comes up working as installed again now.
The focus from the project side is going to be creating the infra
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Is this for real? Oracle are apparently a thorn in the side to RH and
> thus all the changes to C6 that caused lots of delays .. if this
> changes as indicated, doesn't that negate all those changes and give
> Oracle a leg up to getting their clone to
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:26:48 +0100
Thomas Göttgens wrote:
> The DHCP client does similar things.
When using DHCP add the line
PEERDNS=no
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-
It keeps your resolv.conf as it is.
Brgds
--
Freundliche Gruesse/Best Regards
Benjamin Hackl
Media FOCUS Researc
As I see it, more and more alternatives to Oracle are in the market. Hadoop,
is cutting into Oracle's revenue.
So, RH needs to concentrate on promoting JBOSS and a version of HADOOP. Don't
worry about Oracle.
Regards
Leslie
Mr. Leslie Satenstein
>
>
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>> Is this for real? Oracle are apparently a thorn in the side to RH and
>> thus all the changes to C6 that caused lots of delays .. if this
>> changes as indicated, doesn't that negate all those ch
On 1/9/2014 11:26 AM, David Miller wrote:
> At this point I really don't see why RedHat doesn't just offer RHEL + updates
> + extra channels for free and then only charge for support. This would put
> them on a real equal ground with Canonical.
I suspect doing so would cut heavily into their rev
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/9/2014 11:26 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> At this point I really don't see why RedHat doesn't just offer RHEL +
>> updates + extra channels for free and then only charge for support. This
>> would put them on a real equal ground with Cano
On 01/09/2014 08:26 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>>> Is this for real? Oracle are apparently a thorn in the side to RH and
>>> thus all the changes to C6 that caused lots of delays .. if this
>>> ch
On 1/9/2014 11:53 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> It is same with SuSE and OpenSuSE, right?
opensuse is more like fedora
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
___
CentOS mailing lis
David Miller wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
>> Look at it another way - we are not working with the RHEL teams, we are
>> working with the RH open source and standards team ( that has no real
>> input into RHEL ) - to expan
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:18:10PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Tell them you can try it out, and if they like the results, they can pay
> for a license and support for RHEL, the "real" thing, and that's a *lot*
> easier sell.
Especially if there's a migration script to convert existing CentOS
On 2014-01-06 11:28, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I believe that the issue is of pressing interest to the entire
> community and I
> would like to read what others have to say on the matter.
I think everyone should assume the entire ecosystem is compromised and
shouldn't trust anything. Code should
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
wrote:
>>
> We can't trust the software or the hardware any longer. When the
> problem runs this deep, what can anyone do? The NSA program has
> effectively removed my trust with every single U.S. (actually, 5 eyes)
> based tech company.
>
> I
On 1/9/2014 1:27 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> I think everyone should assume the entire ecosystem is compromised and
> shouldn't trust anything. Code should be reviewed and bugs/weaknesses
> removed IMMEDIATELY. The problem is obviously not everyone is a
> programmer and not everyone will ha
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/9/2014 1:27 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
>> I think everyone should assume the entire ecosystem is compromised and
>> shouldn't trust anything. Code should be reviewed and bugs/weaknesses
>> removed IMMEDIATELY. The problem is obviou
I always just assumed that blowfish was good precisely because it
> wasn't the one that was recommended/promoted by the groups likely to
> be compromised. But, I try to stay out of politics so I don't worry
> much about keeping secrets anyway.
>
>
It might be easier to compromise security of comm
On 1/9/2014 2:20 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> It might be easier to compromise security of commercial products as source
> code is not available.
they seem to have succeeded in compromising STANDARDS and ALGORITHMS, to
heck with implementations.
--
john r pierce
On 01/09/2014 04:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/9/2014 1:27 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
>> I think everyone should assume the entire ecosystem is compromised and
>> shouldn't trust anything. Code should be reviewed and bugs/weaknesses
>> removed IMMEDIATELY. The problem is obviously not
On 01/09/2014 05:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 1/9/2014 1:27 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
>>> I think everyone should assume the entire ecosystem is compromised and
>>> shouldn't trust anything. Code should be reviewed and bugs/weaknes
On 01/09/2014 05:20 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> I always just assumed that blowfish was good precisely because it
>> wasn't the one that was recommended/promoted by the groups likely to
>> be compromised. But, I try to stay out of politics so I don't worry
>> much about keeping secrets anyway.
>
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2014 05:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:55 PM, John R Pierce
>> wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2014 1:27 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
I think everyone should assume the entire ecosystem is compromised and
shouldn't trust anything. Code s
On 01/09/2014 05:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/9/2014 2:20 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> It might be easier to compromise security of commercial products as source
>> code is not available.
> they seem to have succeeded in compromising STANDARDS and ALGORITHMS, to
> heck with implementations.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I always just assumed that blowfish was good precisely because it
>> wasn't the one that was recommended/promoted by the groups likely to
>> be compromised. But, I try to stay out of politics so I don't worry
>> much about keeping secr
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2014 05:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 1/9/2014 2:20 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> It might be easier to compromise security of commercial products as
>>> source code is not available. they seem to have succeeded in compromising
STANDARDS and ALGORITHMS,
Hi,
I just installed a CentOS 6.5 System with the intention of using thinly
provisioned snapshots. I created the volume group, a thinpool and then a
logical volume. All of that works fine but when I create a snapshot
"mysnap" then the snapshot volume gets displayed in the "lvs" output
with the
On 01/09/2014 05:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> I always just assumed that blowfish was good precisely because it
>>> wasn't the one that was recommended/promoted by the groups likely to
>>> be compromised. But, I try to stay out of polit
hi,
We have, like in the years past, a table at Fosdem and I'd like to get
some tshirts printed to hand out. In the past, the Linux Ninja's and
Beards ones got quite a bit of attention ( and both were not brand
spammy, which is always nice ).
Reaching out to the mailing list for ideas on what we
Can you not set up a test system and try it out? Or, if this is your only
system, could you not back it up, and test your suggestions out?
The mysql "shell" is for viewing data in your databases and manipulating
the data in required. You can also add tables and things like that. It is a
powerful t
How about the CentOS T-shirt wearing penguin with a red fedora cocked on this
head.
Padre King
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
Karanbir Singh wrote:
>hi,
>
>We have, like in the years past, a table at Fosdem and I'd like to get
>some tshirts printed to hand out. In the past, the Li
On 01/10/2014 12:30 PM, Johnny King wrote:
How about the CentOS T-shirt wearing penguin with a red fedora cocked on this
head.
+1
Padre King
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi,
We have, like in the years past, a table at Fosdem and I'd like to get
some tsh
I was shocked and horrified to find out that RHEL (and presumably CentOS)
and Ubuntu no longer implement the 'rot13' program.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2014 05:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:55 PM, John R Pierc
On 01/10/2014 12:32 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 12:30 PM, Johnny King wrote:
>> How about the CentOS T-shirt wearing penguin with a red fedora cocked
>> on this head.
> +1
Maybe not the Red fedora but yellow or multi-colour with CentOS colors
in mind?
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is i
On 1/9/2014 3:33 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> I was shocked and horrified to find out that RHEL (and presumably CentOS)
> and Ubuntu no longer implement the 'rot13' program.
tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m outfile
example...
$ echo this is a message | tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m
guvf vf n zrffntr
$ echo guvf
On 9 January 2014 13:35, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> As I see it, more and more alternatives to Oracle are in the market.
> Hadoop, is cutting into Oracle's revenue.
>
> So, RH needs to concentrate on promoting JBOSS and a version of HADOOP.
> Don't worry about Oracle.
>
>
Fedora 20 allows for i
Benjamin Hackl wrote:
> When using DHCP add the line
>
> PEERDNS=no
>
> in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-
> It keeps your resolv.conf as it is.
Thanks for that.
I don't know if this was a sheer fluke,
but when I added that from my laptop the connection to my server
was immediately broke
Thanks! I got similar suggestions when I mentioned this at work. I was of
course joking about rot13.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:41 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/9/2014 3:33 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> > I was shocked and horrified to find out that RHEL (and presumably CentOS)
> >
On 1/9/2014 3:46 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> IPforwarding was turned off on my server,
>[root@alfred ~]# sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward
>net.ipv4.ip_forward = 0
> I had to run
>[root@alfred ~]# sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
>net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
>
> Who changes this setting, and wh
On 01/09/2014 06:33 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> I was shocked and horrified to find out that RHEL (and presumably CentOS)
> and Ubuntu no longer implement the 'rot13' program.
But they implement the NULL cipher as part of IPsec.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cliff
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Robert M
Karanbir
Whatever you guys come up with, I hope it has "CentOS" somewhere in
the printing. I also hope that geeks like me who aren't present at
that conference have a chance to get the T-shirts, even if we have to
pay for shipping.
David Kurn
San Francisco
At 03:07 PM 1/9/2014, you wrote:
On 01/09/2014 08:22 PM, david wrote:
> Karanbir
>
> Whatever you guys come up with, I hope it has "CentOS" somewhere in
> the printing. I also hope that geeks like me who aren't present at
> that conference have a chance to get the T-shirts, even if we have to
> pay for shipping.
>
> David Kurn
>
On 01/10/2014 02:25 AM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> Can you not set up a test system and try it out? Or, if this is your only
> system, could you not back it up, and test your suggestions out?
I dont have enough unit test in mind to assume it's safe.
> The mysql "shell" is for viewing data in your datab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mihamina Rakotomandimby said the following on 09/01/2014 10:27:
> Default MySQL installation on CentOS sets /bin/bash as shell.
I checked in my CentOS 6 installations.
Only one (the latest) has this issue, so it could be something added/modified
in
51 matches
Mail list logo
