> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 26 december 2013 05:05
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos-compatible motherboards
>
> > See:https://hardware.redhat.com/RHEL6
>
> that listi
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hello,
On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables):
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp
Hi Dimitar!
We only want to SSSD with 389DS instead of the local passwd/shadow
files. We do not want to go full IPA for this server.
Setting up SSSD with authconfig automatically set up PAM and
/etc/nsswitch.conf.
SSSD will only be used for these (nsswitch.conf):
passwd:files sss
shadow:
After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened standards in
apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust anything?
Can we trust the bios?
Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the compiled
version of a clean code?Given that most
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables):
>
> *filter
> :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
> -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
> -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-
John Doe wrote:
> After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened standards
> in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust
> anything?
> Can we trust the bios?
>
> Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the
> compiled version of a
Am 07.01.2014 um 15:01 schrieb Vipul Agarwal :
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables):
>>
>> *filter
>> :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
>> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
>> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
>> :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
Ken Smith wrote:
> Hi All and happy new year,
>
> Via a cron job a USB disk is mounted on a Centos 6.4 machine for backup
> and dismounted after. I've noticed this failing. See below, the backup
> directory that was in /mnt had disappeared, so creating it again as
> follows...
>
> {snip}
>
On Mon, January 6, 2014 16:51, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Looks like it's rtrying to install it, not just build it. In the first
> example, you're trying to replace the existing /usr/bin/strip, which only
> root can do. Are you doing make, or make install?
>
I started out by using the openssl.s
What about selinux - wasn't that originally done by the NSA?
On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
>> After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened standards
>> in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust
>> anything?
>> Can
I just did a yum update on my CentOS 5.10 desktop machine and it installed FF
24. And tabs have appeared and cannot be [really] removed! Arg!!! *I HATE
TABS!* (Yes I did installed the "hide tabs when there is only one tab"
plugin, but that is not really a complete solution.)
In the Mozilla
From: James B. Byrne
> I have a USB key that when inserted into a port on my CentOS-6.5 system
> maounts as this:
>
> /dev/sdb1 /media/22d773e3-8502-4196-b45f-388380dcee48 ext2
> rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks 0 0
>
> What is the mechanism to give this thing a more human usable mount name /
> v
From: Robert Heller
> I just did a yum update on my CentOS 5.10 desktop machine and it installed FF
> 24. And tabs have appeared and cannot be [really] removed! Arg!!! *I HATE
> TABS!* (Yes I did installed the "hide tabs when there is only one
> tab"
> plugin, but that is not really a com
Just audit the source code...
7.1.2014 16.42 kirjoitti "Steve Clark" :
> What about selinux - wasn't that originally done by the NSA?
>
> On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > John Doe wrote:
> >> After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened standards
> >> in apps,
On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
>> After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened standards
>> in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust
>> anything?
>> Can we trust the bios?
>>
>> Can we trust the compiler not to ste
On 07/01/2014 15:52, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John Doe wrote:
After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened standards
in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we trust
anything?
Can we trust the bios?
Can we trus
On 07/01/2014 15:55, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 07/01/2014 15:52, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/07/2014 09:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John Doe wrote:
After all the news about backdoors, "planted" bugs or weakened
standards
in apps, in routers, hardware firmwares, etc... these days, can we
trust
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> Can we trust the bios?
Can we trust the compiler not to stealthily inject a backdoor in the
compiled version of a clean code?Given that most entries from the The
International Obfuscated C Code Contest (http://www.iocc
- "Nikolaos Milas" escreveu:
> De: "Nikolaos Milas"
> Para: centos@centos.org
> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 7 de Janeiro de 2014 10:28:33 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected
> Assunto: [CentOS] Forward http traffic
>
> Hello,
>
> On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables):
>
> *filter
> :INPUT
I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk
controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it.
I found a useful description at
http://www.linuxhelp.in/2013/08/Installing-centos-on-HP-Proliant-DL360e-Gen8-with-B120i-controller.html
I have a pair of hard
On 1/7/2014 10:39 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk
> controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it.
fwiw, centos 6.recent should recognize that controller, I know it
supports the P420i thats in the DL??0p Gen
Tony Mountifield wrote:
> I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk
> controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it.
>
> I found a useful description at
> http://www.linuxhelp.in/2013/08/Installing-centos-on-HP-Proliant-DL360e-Gen8-with-B120i-contro
Hi Mitja,
>From the description of the problem it seems that the usermod - SSSD
integration is not working. 389DS just stores the user information but SSSD
is not enforcing the policy, and usermod fails because the user info is not
stored locally.
I think you should consider using FreeIPA instead
Fantastic news!
CentOS and RHEL have been mutually beneficial projects for years. As a
user of both, I am extremely happy to see the ties grow between the
communities.
digimer
On 07/01/14 04:09 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> With great excitemen
> On 07/01/14 04:09 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > - - Because we are now able to work with the Red Hat legal teams, some
> > of the contraints that resulted in efforts like CentOS-QA being behind
> > closed doors, now go away and we hope to have the entire build, test,
> > and delivery chain op
Dne 7.1.2014 22:09, Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
> With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red
> Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining
> forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards
> team ( http://community.redhat.com/
That is amazing news, I hope this proves to be a great relationship.
Congratulations, looking forward to the future.
Aly
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: Karanbir Singh
Sender: centos-announce-boun...@centos.org
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 20
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 21:09 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red
> Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining
> forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards
> team ( http://communit
> With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red
> Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining
> forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards
> team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation
> beyond the plat
Thanks, that was the solution for me too
Scott Robbins writes:
> I may have solved this. As I was doing CR updates in bits and pieces, I
> think I installed nss-softokn and didn't install nss-softokn-freebl.
> Installing both at the same time seems to have fixed the issue.
>
___
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 21:09 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red
> Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining
> forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards
> team ( http://community
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:04:29AM +, Always Learning wrote:
> The compulsory imposition of USA law on all Centos downloaders creates
> the possibility of being arrested in one's home country and sent to the
[...]
> Can anyone remember seeing this on the old Centos ?
> By downloading Cen
I installed the RHEL 7 beta here to test while waiting for CentOS 7 to
arrive. On noticing that yum didn't work, I decided to set up a local
mirror. I rsync'd
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/
to a local web server here, then regenerated the repodata directory
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
> If the software was
> subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page
> stating it.
[EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations]
How would a mere downloader from a mirror, or a purchaser of a Centos
disk or even a
On 07/01/14 08:27 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
>>If the software was
>> subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page
>> stating it.
>
> [EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations]
>
> How would a mere download
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:27:49AM +, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> > If the software was
> > subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page
> > stating it.
>
> [EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations]
>
>
On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 05:14 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Fantastic news!
>
> CentOS and RHEL have been mutually beneficial projects for years. As a
> user of both, I am extremely happy to see the ties grow between the
> communities.
>
> digimer
>
Centos for the desktop! RHEL for the backend! Okay
On 01/07/2014 07:21 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> I'm patiently waiting for Centos on my Cube (Android) tablet.
What ARM ver? Is there Fedora for it? This takes lots of time, but f20
works on a lot of ARMv7 units. Now what ver of RH will that map into? :)
___
On 1/7/2014 8:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 07:21 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> >I'm patiently waiting for Centos on my Cube (Android) tablet.
> What ARM ver? Is there Fedora for it? This takes lots of time, but f20
> works on a lot of ARMv7 units. Now what ver of RH will that m
On 01/07/2014 08:38 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:27:49AM +, Always Learning wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
>>
>>>If the software was
>>> subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page
>>> stating it.
>> [EAR =
On 01/07/2014 11:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/7/2014 8:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> On 01/07/2014 07:21 PM, Always Learning wrote:
I'm patiently waiting for Centos on my Cube (Android) tablet.
>> What ARM ver? Is there Fedora for it? This takes lots of time, but f20
>> works on a
On 12/20/2013 03:55 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Ted Miller
>> Sent: den 17 december 2013 05:19
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: [CentOS] grub color on C6 (not)
>>
>> I have tried more
43 matches
Mail list logo
