On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:54 AM, wrote:
>>
>> On 12/30/2013, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>> If so, the recent xorg-x11-server updates require that you rebuild (or
>>> reinstall) the drivers as those drivers replace some xorg files and if
>>> you do not reinst
On 26/12/13 06:05, John R Pierce wrote:
> that listing is nearly useless for this.it doesn't contain
> motherboards, it contains complete brand name systems that were
> submitted for paid testing.
What is so bad for paid testings?
If it was tested for a reasonable usage it's fine.
If you have a
On 1/1/2014 12:50 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 26/12/13 06:05, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >that listing is nearly useless for this.it doesn't contain
>> >motherboards, it contains complete brand name systems that were
>> >submitted for paid testing.
> What is so bad for paid testings?
> If it
On 01/01/14 23:09, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> my point is, the coverage of that hardware listing on the redhat site is
> woefully inadequate for the needs of the OP. NO motherboards or
> chipsets are listed, just complete systems, mostly servers. Even the
> HP DL160gen8 servers I just bought for
On 1/1/2014 2:02 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Indeed the HP DL160gen8 might not be in the list..
> I am sure that a Xeon CPU from the E5-2600 product family should work
> and meet Linux Desktop and Server.
I'm glad you're so sure (and yes in fact, it did work...), but my
original point remains
On 02/01/14 00:13, John R Pierce wrote:
> I'm glad you're so sure (and yes in fact, it did work...), but my
> original point remains, thehttp://hardware.redhat.com listings are
> nearly useless.
For who?
Eliezer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 1/1/2014 2:56 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 02/01/14 00:13, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >I'm glad you're so sure (and yes in fact, it did work...), but my
>> >original point remains, thehttp://hardware.redhat.com listings are
>> >nearly useless.
> For who?
for the original poster, who was askin
On 02/01/14 01:19, John R Pierce wrote:
> for the original poster, who was asking on this thread which
> motherboards would work, as the hardware.redhat.com site doesn't list
> motherboards.
>
> and useless for me, when they don't include the major brand server
> models I might be considering for w
I want to make sure that while compiling as root nothing will break down
inside the machine.
I want to compile software on a Xeon SERVER.
The basic issue is that there is a recommendation to not compile it as a
root user.
I have compiled software as a root user more then once and I am not sure
On 1/1/2014 3:42 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Just to make sure I understand the question again:
> PC and Servers hardware is suppose to be BIOS compatible?
> In a case that these do comply and Linux is not supporting BIOS it's
> another story.
huh? the BIOS is nearly irrelevant, its code is use
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 01:53:09 +0200
Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> I have compiled software as a root user more then once and I am not sure
> why would there is a need to run it as non-root user?
1. Bad Things™ happen sometimes. If you are root, Worse Things™ can happen
than what might happen if yo
On 01/01/14 16:26, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:54 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/30/2013, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
If so, the recent xorg-x11-server updates require that you rebuild (or
reinstall) the drivers as those drivers r
Hello,
I've started reviewing HA solution for HAProxy and trying to decide between
RHEL HA Add-on and KeeAlived. Just curious if anyone had a chance to use
any of these technologies in a production environment? I would love to
learn what your experience with these technologies is in terms of
manag
On 1/1/2014 3:53 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> I have compiled software as a root user more then once and I am not sure
> why would there is a need to run it as non-root user?
Its the principle of least privilege.
You don't need to be root to compile software, or to test software in a
local dire
Hey John,
Thanks!
On 02/01/14 02:14, John R Pierce wrote:
> Its the principle of least privilege.
>
> You don't need to be root to compile software, or to test software in a
> local directory, you only need root privileges to install it to a system
> directory. When you're developing, building,
The BIOS is what the hardware is based upon and the testing of a
Mother-Board should be started at the BIOS level.
The Basic Input Output for today hardware is basically based on USB even
for many servers.
There are cases which you see a system that CentOS6 was not designed to
work with.
Not j
16 matches
Mail list logo
