This worked fine for years until I updated firefox and thunderbird
recently. Now, however, when I click on a link in an email in
thunderbird, rather than open the indicated webpage in firefox, nothing
at all happens.
network.protocol-handler.app.http in tbird's about:config specifies the
exec
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:08 AM, ken wrote:
> This worked fine for years until I updated firefox and thunderbird
> recently. Now, however, when I click on a link in an email in
> thunderbird, rather than open the indicated webpage in firefox, nothing
> at all happens.
>
> network.protocol-handle
On 24 DEC 2013 @20:13 zulu, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I thought we had that one ticked off as done for 6.5...
That's how I installed 6.5 in a roll-around relay rack test stand...
though Anaconda still isn't very robust.
If it hits a retry during the install, it just crashes and exits instead
of
Hi,
I could remove session icon modifying the file:
/usr/share/xsessions/gnome.desktop
I delete all content but not the first line ( [Desktop Entry] )
Now I have to figure it out the Language icon because after remove all
language options in gnome.desktop file gdm is showing it anyway with
Engl
On 25/12/13 18:08, ken wrote:
> This worked fine for years until I updated firefox and thunderbird
> recently. Now, however, when I click on a link in an email in
> thunderbird, rather than open the indicated webpage in firefox, nothing
> at all happens.
>
> network.protocol-handler.app.http in t
Hi all!
I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB and
CPU to upgrade my desktop.
Although I've always been partial to AMD chips, I'm tempted this time to
find something Intel-ish, I5, quad core, or so.
In looking at mommyboards at New Egg and Amazon, I find so many I
2013/12/26 Fred Smith
> Hi all!
>
> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB and
> CPU to upgrade my desktop.
>
> Although I've always been partial to AMD chips, I'm tempted this time to
> find something Intel-ish, I5, quad core, or so.
>
> In looking at mommyboards
On 12/25/2013 7:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> In looking at mommyboards at New Egg and Amazon, I find so many I am
> unable to make reasonable determinations regarding suitability, so am
> hoping some of you who have new(ish) intel-compatible boards could
> offer some hints.
my build last year was o
On 12/25/2013 7:56 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> In looking at mommyboards at New Egg and Amazon, I find so many I am
>> >unable to make reasonable determinations regarding suitability, so am
>> >hoping some of you who have new(ish) intel-compatible boards could
>> >offer some hints.
>> >
> See:htt
On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB
> and CPU to upgrade my desktop.
to answer such a question is not that easy, other than, to say that
most all quality mainboards of today should work and it is really
up
On 12/25/2013 11:09 PM, g wrote:
> because you are upgrading a box, do consider upping power supply
> to at least 650 watt for load you will be adding.
huh? my system uses about 200-250 watts actual line current running
full tilt, its a core i5-3570k overclocked to 4.2ghz, with 16gb ram, 1
250
11 matches
Mail list logo
