How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Am 18.12.2013 09:31, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
> How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
May I ask why you like to do so? That's not a clever idea.
If you don't want to run Postfix, then switch it off. If you run it on
purpose, then you should have a possibility to see what it does.
On 18/12/2013 4:00 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 18.12.2013 09:31, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>> How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
> May I ask why you like to do so? That's not a clever idea.
>
> If you don't want to run Postfix, then switch it off. If you run it on
> purpose,
Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
> My PostFix server is running good now,
> but, When I send many email from my server,
> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
> Just, can you tell me, can i make it disable ?
> If yes, Please te
On 18/12/2013 4:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>> On 18/12/2013 4:00 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> Am 18.12.2013 09:31, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog ) ?
>>> May I ask why you like to do so? That's not a
On 12/18/2013 05:47 AM Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>> My PostFix server is running good now,
>> but, When I send many email from my server,
>> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
>> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
>> Just, can yo
On 18/12/2013 4:57 PM, ken wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 05:47 AM Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
>>> My PostFix server is running good now,
>>> but, When I send many email from my server,
>>> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
>>> so, I want to
Hi,
Wednesday, December 18, 2013, 11:26:26 AM, you wrote:
> When I send many email from my server, PostFix make log file big.
> now my log file is 30MB .. :(
> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
You shouldn't disable logging, you should run logrotate so that it
takes care of old log files a
On 12/18/2013 11:49 PM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
> If my file is very big, do i loss my server performance ?
> My vps is 512 MB RAM.. So ?
You're newer to a lot more than just Linux if you think that log files
use up RAM.
RAM != Disk space.
Peter
___
C
On 18/12/2013 5:23 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 11:49 PM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>> If my file is very big, do i loss my server performance ?
>> My vps is 512 MB RAM.. So ?
> You're newer to a lot more than just Linux if you think that log files
> use up RAM.
>
> RAM != Disk space.
>
>
> Peter
>
On 12/18/2013 06:03 AM JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2013 4:57 PM, ken wrote:
>> On 12/18/2013 05:47 AM Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> Am 18.12.2013 11:26, schrieb JEWEL AHMMED:
My PostFix server is running good now,
but, When I send many email from my server,
PostFix make log file b
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 12/18/2013, 04:00 , li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
> I may be being presumptuous, and if so, I apologize in advance...
>
> It sounds to me like you might consider a disk-to-disk backup solution.
> I could suggest dirvish, BackupPC, or our own home-rolled rsync-based
> solution that works rath
Ashley M. Kirchner writes:
>
> So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be
> repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD and all then
> realized ... I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has
> USB ports on it, and I don't have a single a
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
>
> Not presumptuous at all! I have not heard of backupbuddy (or dirvish),
> so I should investigate. Your description makes it sound somewhat like
> OS-X Time Machine, which I like a lot. I did try backuppc but it got a
> bit complex to manag
What about when special modules need to be in the initrd for hardware
upon which boot depends (raid cards, SAN HBAs, NICs sometimes)?
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:26 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
> Ashley M. Kirchner writes:
>
>>
>> So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be
>>
Presumably, that's what you'd use kickstart for ... but I'm going to leave
that for someone with more knowledge answer that. I'm just happy with a
working system right now.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Billy Crook wrote:
> What about when special modules need to be in the initrd for hardwa
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Billy Crook wrote:
> What about when special modules need to be in the initrd for hardware
> upon which boot depends (raid cards, SAN HBAs, NICs sometimes)?
>
If you are building an image to run on a different system, you can add
the drivers in /etc/modeprobe.con
On 2013-12-18, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
>
> My PostFix server is running good now,
> but, When I send many email from my server,
> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
> Just, can you tell me, can i make it disable ?
> If yes, Please tell
On 19/12/2013 1:44 AM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-12-18, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>>
>> My PostFix server is running good now,
>> but, When I send many email from my server,
>> PostFix make log file big. now my log file is 30MB .. :(
>> so, I want to disable log reporting it.
>> Just, can you tell
On 12/18/2013 07:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I've always considered backuppc to be one of those rare things that
> you set up once and it takes care of itself for years. If you have
> problems with it, someone on the backuppc mail list might be able to
> help. It does tend to be slower than nat
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Lists wrote:
> >
> I would differentiate BackupBuddy in that there is no "incremental" and
> "full" distinction. All backups are "full" in the truest sense of the
> word,
For the people who don't know, backuppc builds a directory tree for
each backup run where the
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 4:33 PM, Lists wrote:
>> This large value doesn't really make sense to me - can somebody explain
>> why the change to such a large value?
>
> its just a limit, it has no impact unless someone claims too much shared
> memory.
>
>
On 12/19/2013 12:33 AM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote:
>
> But, When my server handle a big file ..
> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory.
> so, what you thinking now ? :D
I'm thinking that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're
trying to solve a non-issue.
Peter
__
On 12/18/2013 03:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> For the people who don't know, backuppc builds a directory tree for
> each backup run where the full runs are complete and the incrementals
> normally only contain the changed files. However, when you access the
> incremental backups through the web int
On 12/18/2013 3:41 PM, Lists wrote:
> Should I read this as "BackupPC now has its own filesystem driver"? If
> so, wow. Or do you mean that there are command line tools to read/copy
> BackupPC save points?
web interface, primarily. you can restore any portion of any version of
any backup to the
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Lists wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 03:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> For the people who don't know, backuppc builds a directory tree for
>> each backup run where the full runs are complete and the incrementals
>> normally only contain the changed files. However, when you
Hi,
I am using CentOS 6.4.
uname -r gives me
3.9.3-x86_64 Kernel version is 2.6.32. My questions -
What is 3.9? In Ubuntu, uname -r and /boot give the same version numbers.
Do we have a mapping of CentOS versions, the numbers like 3.9 and
kernel versions maintained somewhere?
Regards,
Jayadev
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Jayadevan Maymala
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using CentOS 6.4.
> uname -r gives me
>
> 3.9.3-x86_64 Kernel version is 2.6.32. My questions -
>
> What is 3.9? In Ubuntu, uname -r and /boot give the same version numbers.
>
> Do we have a mapping of CentOS versions, the num
29 matches
Mail list logo
