From: Frank Cox
> The ISP that I do some occasional work for is planning to roll out a new and
> much faster Internet service, and as such they will be coming here on Monday
> to
> upgrade my connection so I can test and play with it for a few weeks before
> they
> roll it out for the genera
From: mcclnx mcc
> #mkbootdisk --verbose --iso --device /tmp/boot.iso 2.6.18-371.1.2.el5
> Installing isolinux... cp: cannot stat `/usr/lib/syslinux/isolinux.bin': No
> such file or directory
Dunno why it looks in /usr/lib but isolinux.bin is in /usr/share/syslinux/
But you can solve it by copy
Am 13.12.2013 um 01:10 schrieb SilverTip257 :
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
>
>>
>>> In a way it's a shame...
>>> At the same time I can see why RH is going x86_64 only ... much hardware in
>>> data centers is 64bit capable and running 64bit OSes.
>>>
>>> And they're
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:05:06AM +0200, Bonnie B Mtengwa wrote:
> Im having problems connecting to Hidden WIFI networks on my RHEL 7 beta.
> I have an HP Elitebook 2560p.
> But if I make the Wireless Access Point visible, im able to connect to it,
> and NM is able to save the connection script
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi,
Has anyone else encounter the following;
While testing the new CentOS 6.5 kernel-2.6.32-431.1.2.el6.x86_64 on a
Dell PowerEdge 2950 in the lab it kernel panics on boot up, complaining
about the scsi_wait_scan Module signed with unknown public key.
The Dell Poweredge 2950 is running
Hi,
Yes, while building a new machine this morning.
There's a bug report for it; info on the cause of the problem there
(missing signing key):
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6831
Thanks,
Paul
--
On 12/13/2013 12:18 PM, MeasureMyEnergy - Tim D'Cruz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone else
On 12/13/2013 12:21 PM, Paul Jones wrote:
Hi,
> Yes, while building a new machine this morning.
>
> There's a bug report for it; info on the cause of the problem there
> (missing signing key):
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6831
Thanks for the reply Paul.
regards Tim
> On 12/13/2013 12:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/12/13 13:21, Paul Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, while building a new machine this morning.
>
> There's a bug report for it; info on the cause of the problem
> there (missing signing key):
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6831
>
> Thanks,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 13.12.2013 um 01:10 schrieb SilverTip257 :
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Leon Fauster <
> leonfaus...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Unless it's embedded hardware ... by the time EL6 isn't supported I'll
> be
> >>> you'll have a be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2013 03:26 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 08:20 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 12/12/2013 01:49 PM, Peter wrote:
>>> On 12/13/2013 02:45 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
What SELInux issue did you have? What policy did you need to add?
>
Hi All.
I have a setup in which:
- applications deployed in weblogic log directly to weblogic;
- components of weblogic (domain, admin server, managed servers) log to
proper files (default logging).
I would like to connect logging to syslog server. Is it possible? As I have
read it is possibl
>In the meantime, don't update your machine, or don't reboot to the new
>kernel (for people having already updated it)
And for those who did the update, booted and got the panic, what do
you suggest short of a total re-install?
This kind of update failure doesn't enhance the reliability
reput
I got the panic on one machine.
I solved this by boot again and selected the previous kernel and the system
came back up.
I think CentOS defaults to keep the last 5 kernels.
M Morén
- Ursprungligt meddelande -
>
> >In the meantime, don't update your machine, or don't reboot to the ne
On 12/12/2013 03:32 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 08:56, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>> Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match
>> the release upsteam
>
> In the aftermath of the CentOS 6.0 trauma, I recall there being
> speculation that building the next major rel
On 13/12/13 16:50, david wrote:
>
>> In the meantime, don't update your machine, or don't reboot to the new
>> kernel (for people having already updated it)
>
>
> And for those who did the update, booted and got the panic, what do
> you suggest short of a total re-install?
>
Reboot and select the
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
John Doe wrote:
> Apart from uploading/downloading a big file and many small files on one of
> their servers and timing it every hour/minutes, maybe have a look at:
> http://sd.wareonearth.com/~phil/net/ttcp/
That does look interesting. Thanks!
--
MELV
On 12/04/2013 06:05 AM, John Doe wrote:
> Not sure if I already mentioned it but maybe have a look at:
> http://code.google.com/p/lsyncd/
We checked lsyncd out and it's most certainly an very interesting tool.
I *will* be using it in the future!
However, we found that it has some issues scalin
In the docs for chkconfig it says:
is a list of the runlevels for which the service
should be started by default. Only services which are really required
for a vital system should define runlevels here. If no runlevels are
defined, a - should be used in place of the runlevels list.
and then:
Mo
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.12.2013 23:00, schrieb Larry Martell:
>> In the docs for chkconfig it says:
>> More commonly, the service is off by default on all runlevels, which
>> looks like this:
>>
>> # chkconfig: - 20 80
>>
>> But services with a chkconfig e
Larry Martell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>> Am 13.12.2013 23:00, schrieb Larry Martell:
>>> In the docs for chkconfig it says:
>>> More commonly, the service is off by default on all runlevels, which
>>> looks like this:
>>>
>>> # chkconfig: - 20 80
>>>
>>> Bu
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>> Am 13.12.2013 23:00, schrieb Larry Martell:
In the docs for chkconfig it says:
More commonly, the service is off by default on all runlevels, which
looks
I've tried to open the power supply to look for capacitor guts and such.
I've unscrewed it from the case and removed the
screws that seemed sufficient for separation.
The stumbling block seems to be under the "QC PASS"
sticker near the rainbow of wires coming out.
I've gotten the edge of a box cutt
I noticed the the grub stanza for my F14 contains the line
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.35.14-106.fc14.i686.PAE ...
For CentOS, I have
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.i686 ...
I note the absence of PAE for CentOS.
I've read that PAE can be important.
Could it be the reason that an F14 boot lasts so
> On 11/25/2013 09:10, Warren Young wrote:
>> Presumably RHEL7 will use grub2,
Confirmed: http://goo.gl/hfwtqF
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:02:17 -0600
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> We have Software Collections for CentOS currently in our testing repo:
>
> http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/
>
> To date I don't think I have gotten any feedback, positive or
> negative, for these SCL RPMs though I know there are hundr
On 12/13/2013 16:20, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Any ideas on how to proceed?
There may be a final screw under one of the stickers.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/14/2013 12:38 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 16:20, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> Any ideas on how to proceed?
>
> There may be a final screw under one of the stickers.
Yes, it looks to me like there should be a screw under the QC Pass
sticker, right under the round circle.
Peter
_
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Peter wrote:
> On 12/14/2013 12:38 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 12/13/2013 16:20, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> Any ideas on how to proceed?
>>
>> There may be a final screw under one of the stickers.
>
> Yes, it looks to me like there should be a screw under the QC Pass
> stic
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
>
> >> and I see a S64mysqld link in rc 2, 3, 4, and 5. Why in those 4 dirs?
> >> Will all scripts with - in the chkconfig entry be started at those 4
> >> levels? How is putting - different from putting 2345?
> >
> > Runlevel 0 is poweroff. 1
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Michael Hennebry <
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
> I've tried to open the power supply to look for capacitor guts and such.
>
If there was a problem with the PSU, you would experience it in your F14
install you spoke of.
> I've unscrewed it from the cas
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Hi All.
>
>
>
> I have a setup in which:
>
> - applications deployed in weblogic log directly to weblogic;
>
> - components of weblogic (domain, admin server, managed servers) log to
> proper files (default logging).
>
I don't use "Weblogic"
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Michael Hennebry <
> henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
>
>> I've tried to open the power supply to look for capacitor guts and such.
>>
>
> If there was a problem with the PSU, you would experience it in your F14
> in
33 matches
Mail list logo
