Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
I wanted to test zimbra on centos 6 (I'm new to centos). While installing
zimbra it said there was a conflict on port 25. So I found out that
postfix is the default mta on centos. I then did sudo yum remove postfix
and followed the prompts for removing it, but in doing so it removed chrome
that
Here are the items removed when removing postfix:
Nov 1 09:56:59 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: google-chrome-stable
Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-compat
Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb
Nov 1 09:57:01 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-gra
Op 30-10-13 17:38, John Doe schreef:
> From: Johan Vermeulen
>
>> no I see I have /dev/md/md_d0 /dev/md_d0p1 /dev/md_d0p2
>> I don't know what is what
> Not sure what you did with lvm but I would say that md_d0 is
> the (raid) device and md_d0p* are its partitions...
> Just do fdisk -l /dev/m
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Wes James wrote:
> Why does
> removing postfix remove these others. cron and the others are dependent on
> having postfix? Seems odd if they are.
They are dependent on having a local SMTP server, for example cron
requires one to send email containing the stderr o
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.11.2013 17:33, schrieb Wes James:
> > Here are the items removed when removing postfix:
>
>
>
> >
> > Seems odd to me that those items would need to be removed just because
> > postfix is removed.
>
> what is there odd?
>
> LSB c
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Wes James wrote:
> > Why does
> > removing postfix remove these others. cron and the others are dependent
> on
> > having postfix? Seems odd if they are.
>
> They are dependent on having a local SMTP server,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.11.2013 17:46, schrieb Wes James:
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bart Schaefer <
> barton.schae...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Wes James wrote:
> >>> Why does
> >>> removing postfix remove these
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> why trial and error?
> chkconfig postfix off
>
> are you really have services uncontrolled running
> instead explicit dsiable or enable them?
>
> chkconfig --list and disable anything you are not using
> if it comes to servers connected
I have need to compile (from source) clutter-1.16.0 (seems to be fine)
and then clutter-gtk 1.4.4
on centos 6.4 (x86-64)
I am getting this error:
ake[2]: Entering directory
`/home/silentm/MessageNet/totem/clutter-gtk-1.4.4/clutter-gtk'
CC gtk-clutter-actor.lo
CC gtk-clutter-embed.
We've just started getting this. We're running 5.10, kernel
2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64. Anyone else seen anything like this, or have
any ideas?
mark
Nov 1 14:34:21 kernel: WARNING: at block/ll_rw_blk.c:543
blk_do_ordered()
Nov 1 14:34:21 kernel:
Nov 1 14:34:21 kernel: Call Trace:
Nov
In an earlier thread it was mentioned I could use postfix stop to stop
postfix. I'm trying to get sshd started and starting on boot. I did
chkconfig sshd on and that worked fine, but then tried sshd start, but that
didn't work. It looks like I need to do service sshd start (I did just
that and i
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Wes James wrote:
> In an earlier thread it was mentioned I could use postfix stop to stop
> postfix. I'm trying to get sshd started and starting on boot. I did
> chkconfig sshd on and that worked fine, but then tried sshd start, but that
> didn't work. It looks l
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Wes James wrote:
> > In an earlier thread it was mentioned I could use postfix stop to stop
> > postfix. I'm trying to get sshd started and starting on boot. I did
> > chkconfig sshd on and that worked fine,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Wes James wrote:
>
> Thanks. But why do some commands require service service-name command
> (like sshd) where postfix works without the service command in front of it?
>
'service command option' is essentially the same as:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/command option
so it ru
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.11.2013 20:49, schrieb Wes James:
> >
>
> >
> > Thanks. But why do some commands require service service-name command
> > (like sshd) where postfix works without the service command in front of
> it?
>
> you still do not realize
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Wes James wrote:
>> But why can you do
>
> postfix stop/start
>
> but not
>
> sshd stop/start. With sshd you need to use service sshd stop/start. It
> seems inconsistent.
If you are looking for consistency, you are in the wrong place.
Linux distributions inherit
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:02:40PM -0600, Wes James wrote:
Please be careful with follow-ups. You are including Reindl in your
replies and quoting his material back to the list when you do. He is
not a member of this list and most of us would prefer to not see his
commentary if at all possible.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:02:40PM -0600, Wes James wrote:
>
> Please be careful with follow-ups. You are including Reindl in your
> replies and quoting his material back to the list when you do. He is
> not a member of this list and mos
Anyone know how to make this thing shut up? I can't find anything that
does, and it's spamming our central log server
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Nov 1, 2013 2:02 PM, "Wes James" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 01.11.2013 20:49, schrieb Wes James:
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> > >
> > > Thanks. But why do some commands require service service-name command
> > > (like sshd) where postfix works with
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:00:43 -0600
Wes James wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>
> > Am 01.11.2013 17:46, schrieb Wes James:
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bart Schaefer <
> > barton.schae...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Wes
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Anyone know how to make this thing shut up? I can't find anything that
> does, and it's spamming our central log server
>
Or maybe it's abrt, though I can't find such a program or daemon
mark
___
CentOS mailing lis
On 2013-11-01, Wes James wrote:
>
> But why can you do
>
> postfix stop/start
>
> but not
>
> sshd stop/start.
It is just the way Postfix and OpenSSH were written. The Postfix
developers wanted one top-level executable to start their daemons
(partly because there are more than one for Postfix).
On 10/27/2013 05:57 PM ken wrote:
> One laptop I'm looking at buying offers these CPU options:
>
> * 4 Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4700MQ Processor ( 2.4 GHz 6MB L3 Cache -
> 4 Cores plus Hyperthreading )
>
> * 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4800MQ Processor ( 2.7 GHz 6MB L3 Cache
> - 4 Cores plus H
On 11/1/2013 1:56 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>> >With sshd you need to use service sshd stop/start. It
>> >seems inconsistent.
> It is. As another poster commented, welcome to linux! Sometimes, if
> you read through the init script in/etc/init.d/, you can see how the
> actual service is called. Th
[
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 05:43:28PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Stephen Harris wrote:
>
>> > Do 'rsyslogd -n -N1 -d' and you might get a better diagnostic
>> > (eg missing libraries or incompatible libraries)
>> >
>> Or ldd /sbin/rs
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Anyone know how to make this thing shut up? I can't find anything that
>> does, and it's spamming our central log server
>>
> Or maybe it's abrt, though I can't find such a program or daemon
>
I finally realized it wasn't the server with
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 05:32:53PM -0400, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> 1968.101297470:7f2b4eda1700: Requested to load module 'imuxsock'
> 1968.101300039:7f2b4eda1700: Module 'imuxsock' already loaded
Well the good news is that the libraries are all good. There's no failure
there. I think it's a com
On Nov 1, 2013, at 2:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We've just started getting this. We're running 5.10, kernel
> 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64. Anyone else seen anything like this, or have
> any ideas?
>
> mark
>
> Nov 1 14:34:21 kernel: WARNING: at block/ll_rw_blk.c:543
> blk_do_ordered()
> We've just started getting this. We're running 5.10, kernel
> 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64. Anyone else seen anything like this, or have
> any ideas?
You're running an el6 kernel under 5.10? or was that just a typo?
Chris
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> On Nov 1, 20
I have installed emacs with yum and now I'm trying to create a .emacs file
and put some commands in it, but I can't type anything in the emacs
buffer. It says the buffer is read-only. I exited emacs and did touch
.emacs and I get a message that it can't do that on a read-only file
system. I goog
usually a disk failure when that happens out of the blue. try writing to
/dev/shm/ if you have to save a file. (That's a virtual fs in memory, so
be advised it will disappear on reboot.) check dmesg for errors.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Wes James wrote:
> I have installed emacs with yum
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Billy Crook wrote:
> usually a disk failure when that happens out of the blue. try writing to
> /dev/shm/ if you have to save a file. (That's a virtual fs in memory, so
> be advised it will disappear on reboot.) check dmesg for errors.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at
On 11/01/2013 06:36 PM, Wes James wrote:
> I have installed emacs with yum and now I'm trying to create a .emacs file
> and put some commands in it, but I can't type anything in the emacs
> buffer. It says the buffer is read-only. I exited emacs and did touch
> .emacs and I get a message that it
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.11.2013 23:51, schrieb Wes James:
> > That was it. This is an old mac pro that I put centos on yesterday. It
> > had 4 disks in it and this is the 3rd that has died. A faculty member
> had
> > it for 5-6 years and it was on 24/7.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Wes James wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald >wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 01.11.2013 23:51, schrieb Wes James:
> > > That was it. This is an old mac pro that I put centos on yesterday.
> It
> > > had 4 disks in it and this is the 3rd that has die
Folks,
I found free-nx in the repositories and tried to install/use it
I could not figure out how to get it working.
I tried following directions on the wiki
But I still could not get it working
Feel free to contact me at
stephen.b...@teradata.com
I am currenly using the official ns se
On 11/1/2013 6:05 PM, Stephen Bovy wrote:
> I am currenly using the official ns server on sles 11 sp3
>
> Is their any direction on how to install free nx on sles ??
you probably should find and ask a SLES list, as this is the CentOS list.
--
john r pierce
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Wes James wrote:
> I do understand that.
>
> But why can you do
>
> postfix stop/start
>
> but not
>
> sshd stop/start. With sshd you need to use service sshd stop/start. It
> seems inconsistent.
The standard way to start and stop services on any Red Hat based Linux system
i
40 matches
Mail list logo
