On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Sam Suresh wrote:
> as i was trying to install in my laptop , it was stuck will an problem, the
> graphics was not seen on the display, means display goes black, when i look
> into display closely negative images were seen, thought might be a problem
> in dispaly
Lists wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 03:48 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 10/23/2013 10:30 AM, Morgan Cox wrote:
>>> If you want SSD + MDRAID you need to use a 3.8+ kernel to have TRIM.
>>>
>>> The speed difference between the stock 2.6.32 -> 3.10 kernel with SSD +
>>> MDRAID is insane.
>> has someone qua
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:57 PM, wrote:
> SilverTip257 wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Patrick Lists <
> > centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/24/2013 04:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> > Hi, folks. This is, in fact, off-topic: I'm fighting a user's FC19
> >> >
On 25.10.2013 00:12, Lists wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 03:48 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 10/23/2013 10:30 AM, Morgan Cox wrote:
>>> If you want SSD + MDRAID you need to use a 3.8+ kernel to have TRIM.
>>>
>>> The speed difference between the stock 2.6.32 -> 3.10 kernel with
>>> SSD +
>>> MDRAID is
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 10/25/2013 04:38 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> interesting datapoint for HDD vs SSD, but what about kernel versions?
> When using SSDs, did you need to use 3.8+ kernels as suggested in the
> quoted post, or do you use stock? thanks
I've taken some flack for being off-topic regards my comm
On 10/24/2013 11:18 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> - vdev, which is a virtual device, something like a software RAID. It is one
> or more disks, configured together, typically with some form of redundancy.
>
> - pool, which is one or more vdevs, which has a capacity equal to all of its
> vdevs added
On 10/24/2013 4:12 PM, Lists wrote:
> Going from HDD to SSD's gave us better than a 95% reduction in query
> times for complex queries using PostgreSQL on otherwise identical
> hardware. I wouldn't have believed it had I not seen it directly, for
> myself.
in some tests I ran, also using postgresq
On 10/25/2013 10:33 AM, Lists wrote:
> LVM2 complicates administration terribly.
huh? it hugely simplifies it for me, when I have lots of drives. I just
wish mdraid and lvm were better integrated. to see how it should have
been done, see IBM AIX's version of lvm.you grow a jfs file system,
On 10/25/2013, 05:00 , centos-requ...@centos.org wrote:
> We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having
> ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to
> manage when you start climbing, especially when you have to upgrade, so
> we're contemplating switc
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/25/2013 10:33 AM, Lists wrote:
>> LVM2 complicates administration terribly.
>
> huh? it hugely simplifies it for me, when I have lots of drives. I just
> wish mdraid and lvm were better integrated. to see how it should have
> been don
for users of thunderbird, up to 17.0.9 anyway, when you compose
a reply to post that has long lines, over 72 characters, pressing
will form line breaks and quotes in reply.
that is if you have;
edit > preferences > advanced > general > config editor
search: wraplength
mailnews.
Hi guys.
've installed varnish-ban-manager (
https://github.com/dot2code/varnish-bans-manager) and I'm currently
configuring it's DNS name. The thing is that I've set in Route53 (DNS
service in AWS) to use name http:// purge.domain.com / pointing to http://
varnish_server_name.com/. The thing is,
On 10/25/2013 00:44, John R Pierce wrote:
> current version of OpenZFS no longer relies on 'version numbers',
> instead it has 'feature flags' for all post v28 features.
This must be the zpool v5000 thing I saw while researching my previous
post. Apparently ZFSonLinux is doing the same thing, or
Am 25.10.2013 um 13:47 schrieb Nux! :
> On 25.10.2013 00:12, Lists wrote:
>> On 10/24/2013 03:48 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> On 10/23/2013 10:30 AM, Morgan Cox wrote:
>>> has someone quantified what this 'insane' amounts to ?
>>
>> Going from HDD to SSD's gave us better than a 95% reduction in q
http://varnish_server.domain:9200/ != 9000
--Mensaje original--
De: Mariano González
Remitente: centos-boun...@centos.org
Para: centos@centos.org
Responder a: CentOS mailing list
Asunto: [CentOS] Varnish-ban-manager + vhosts
Enviado: 25 de oct de 2013 18:03
Hi guys.
've installed varnis
On 10/25/2013 11:33, Lists wrote:
>
> I'm just trying to find the best tool for the job.
Try everything. Seriously.
You won't know what you like, and what works *for you* until you have
some experience. Buy a Drobo for the home, replace one of your old file
servers with a FreeBSD ZFS box, ena
On 10/25/2013 1:26 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 10/25/2013 00:44, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >current version of OpenZFS no longer relies on 'version numbers',
>> >instead it has 'feature flags' for all post v28 features.
> This must be the zpool v5000 thing I saw while researching my previous
> post.
On re-reading, I realized I didn't complete some of my thoughts:
On 10/25/2013 00:18, Warren Young wrote:
> ZFS is nicer in this regard, in that it lets you schedule the scrub
> operation. You can obviously schedule one for btrfs,
...with cron...
> but that doesn't take into account scrub time.
On 10/26/2013 06:40 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> to see how it should have
> been done, see IBM AIX's version of lvm.you grow a jfs file system,
> it automatically grows the underlying LV (logical volume), online,
> live.
lvm can do this with the --resizefs flag for lvextend, one command t
On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 07:44 -0600, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Earl A Ramirez
> wrote:
>
> > Sorry for top posting, this is the only option that the phone allow.
> >
> > If the host is running a X server you can use -X option with ssh.
> >
> > $ ssh -X user@host
> > A
21 matches
Mail list logo
