Hi all,
i recently found that some frontend servers (Centos6) show:
kernel: bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth2.
kernel: bonding: bond0: link status definitely down for interface eth2,
disabling it
kernel: bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth2.
On
We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach to some CentOS5
servers. I have tried an older Dell PE1950 and a newer R310 but neither one
seems to be able to read the drive. It works no problem on windows
servers/workstations and I was able to format with NTFS.
I know there are di
james wrote:
> We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach to some
> CentOS5 servers. I have tried an older Dell PE1950 and a newer R310 but
> neither one seems to be able to read the drive. It works no problem
> on windows servers/workstations and I was able to format with NTFS.
>
Update to CentOS6 or try reformatting them to multiple ext3 (under 2TB)
partitions.
On 08/12/2013 09:59 AM, james wrote:
> We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach to some CentOS5
> servers. I have tried an older Dell PE1950 and a newer R310 but neither one
> seems to be able
Mike McCarthy wrote:
> Update to CentOS6 or try reformatting them to multiple ext3 (under 2TB)
> partitions.
>
> On 08/12/2013 09:59 AM, james wrote:
>> We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach to some
>> CentOS5 servers. I have tried an older Dell PE1950 and a newer R310 but
nei
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> On 08/09/2013 05:35 PM, John Doe wrote:
> > From: Dave Johansen
> >
> >>> > I just did a clean net install of CentOS 6.4 and when I run
> >>> > virt-manager it says that qemu-kvm is missing, but when I try to
> >>> > install it
So, having returned from a month's vacation, I'm back to work on attempting
to build a set of small form factor CentOS compatible computers. I've
really tried to do my homework, but this doesn't appear (at first glance)
to be at all easy. It's not made easier by the fact that I have to get it
right
>
> I'll really like CentOS/RHEL and will definitely stick with it. The
> point of my questions wasn't to complain or any like that, but just
> surprise because it seemed that the no 32 bit support didn't line up
> with my experience and just trying to make sure I understood
> everything.
>
> Tha
On 8/12/2013 6:59 AM, james wrote:
> We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach to some CentOS5
> servers. I have tried an older Dell PE1950 and a newer R310 but neither one
> seems to be able to read the drive. It works no problem on windows
> servers/workstations and I was able t
Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> So, having returned from a month's vacation, I'm back to work on
> attempting to build a set of small form factor CentOS compatible
computers. I've
> really tried to do my homework, but this doesn't appear (at first glance)
> to be at all easy. It's not made easier by the fa
On 8/12/2013 9:59 AM, james wrote:
> We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach to some CentOS5
> servers. I have tried an older Dell PE1950 and a newer R310 but neither one
> seems to be able to read the drive. It works no problem on windows
> servers/workstations and I was able t
On 8/12/2013 9:14 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> * 1U short-depth rackmount chassis OR Mini-ITX small-footprint chassis
> ...
> * Dual 1920x1200 monitor display
those two requirements together are unusual. most rackmount 1U systems
are headless, except a basic VGA for initial configuration.
dual d
m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Now, about what you're looking to build - you say that you want 1U, and
> mention rackspace: in my experience, rackmounts are a *lot* larger than a
> pizza box, so I'm a little confused at the requirements you're building
> for.
The rack is already full; I only get tha
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 9:14 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> > * 1U short-depth rackmount chassis OR Mini-ITX small-footprint chassis
> > * Dual 1920x1200 monitor display
>
> those two requirements together are unusual. most rackmount 1U systems
> are headless, except a basic VGA for ini
On 08/12/2013 07:30 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> motherboard, a disk drive, and one expansion card.
>
Have you consider
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
>
> Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> motherboard, a disk drive, and one expansion card.
Depend
On 08/12/2013 01:22 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> Now, about what you're looking to build - you say that you want 1U, and
>> mention rackspace: in my experience, rackmounts are a *lot* larger than a
>> pizza box, so I'm a little confused at the requirements you're buildi
On 8/12/2013 10:30 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
>
> Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> motherboard, a disk drive, and one expansion card.
how about an ul
Am 12.08.2013 17:07, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> Mike McCarthy wrote:
>> Update to CentOS6 or try reformatting them to multiple ext3 (under 2TB)
>> partitions.
>>
>> On 08/12/2013 09:59 AM, james wrote:
>>> We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach to some
>>> CentOS5 servers. I h
On Aug 12, 2013, at 14:01, John R Pierce wrote:
> how about an ultrasmall form factor desktop, such as the Dell Optiplex
> 7010 USFF ? those have dual displayport outputs (requires $7 optional
> video output panel), and are 24x6.5x24cm
I was going to recommend the Optiplex 7010 as well. I ru
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
[snip]
> Third (more general) question: My requirements are (I believe) modest:
> * 1U short-depth rackmount chassis OR Mini-ITX small-footprint chassis
> * Dual GbE network ports
> * Dual 1920x1200 monitor display
> * One SSD drive
> * 32-bi
On 8/12/2013 11:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> VERY STRONG RECOMMENDATION: DON'T buy Supermicro. They have a *lot* of
> trouble with this new, fuzzy concept called "quality control".
We have a *lot* of SuperMicro based systems in the field, and they
aren't failing. In fact, I can't remember the l
Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> Now, about what you're looking to build - you say that you want 1U, and
>> mention rackspace: in my experience, rackmounts are a *lot* larger than
>> a pizza box, so I'm a little confused at the requirements you're building
>> for.
>
> The rack
Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 11:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> VERY STRONG RECOMMENDATION: DON'T buy Supermicro. They have a *lot* of
>> trouble with this new, fuzzy concept called "quality control".
>
> We have a *lot* of SuperMicro based systems in the field, and they
> aren't failing. In
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 12.08.2013 17:07, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Mike McCarthy wrote:
>>> Update to CentOS6 or try reformatting them to multiple ext3 (under 2TB)
>>> partitions.
>>>
>>> On 08/12/2013 09:59 AM, james wrote:
We have a 3TB external USB drive that I am trying to attach
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:56:59PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'll note right back at'cha that all of the 3TB drives we have appear to
> have firmware in them that will present the blocks as 512b.
Many/most "advanced format" do "512e" but not all do.
The newer 1Tb disks I have do, as "smar
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:56:59PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I'll note right back at'cha that all of the 3TB drives we have appear to
>> have firmware in them that will present the blocks as 512b.
>
> Many/most "advanced format" do "512e" but not all do.
>
> The ne
On 12.08.2013 20:42, Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 11:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> VERY STRONG RECOMMENDATION: DON'T buy Supermicro. They have a *lot* of
>> trouble with this new, fuzzy concept called "quality control".
>
> We have a *lot* of SuperMicro based systems in the field, and they
>
On Aug 12, 2013 1:57 PM, "Ljubomir Ljubojevic" wrote:
>
> On 08/12/2013 07:30 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> > Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> > hoping to squeeze something in.
> >
> > Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> > mo
Hello, I'm curiuos if anyone knows if it's possible to set up a Dell R515
(which has PERC H700) to be JBOD.
It seems the only options are RAID0 or RAID1.
I read posts, where people say it can by done by making each disk its own
RAID0. This works, but it wigs out when that disk is removed, and fo
Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Hello, I'm curiuos if anyone knows if it's possible to set up a Dell R515
> (which has PERC H700) to be JBOD.
> It seems the only options are RAID0 or RAID1.
> I read posts, where people say it can by done by making each disk its own
> RAID0. This works, but it wigs out whe
>>
>> From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
>>To: CentOS mailing list
>> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:59 PM
>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dell R515 with PERC H700 - JBOD?
>>
>>
>> My plan is to have a system where I can remove and replace the drives
>> regularly, while the system is on/running. I do this on
> > Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> > hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> how about an ultrasmall form factor desktop, such as the Dell Optiplex
> 7010 USFF ? those have dual displayport outputs (requires $7 optional
> video output panel), and are 24x6
On Aug 12, 2013, at 16:17, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> I didn't even know that the Optiplex 7010 was CentOS compatible (though
> someone may have mentioned it in my previous thread); it is not on the
> RedHat Hardware List, not does Dell's web site go out of its way to mention
> it. Again, how does o
On 8/12/2013 12:54, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Well, *all* of these are rackmount servers, with no moving-the-server
> wear.
Our servers are all rack-mounted, too, and pretty much never get moved
after being installed.
In any case, I was referring to wear in the electromechanical components
of
On Monday 12 August 2013, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> I've copied some files from the firefox cache.
> According to file, they are Macromedia Flash data (compressed),
> version 9. How do I play them locally?
Download the Flash files using Video Download Helper:
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/fire
Hi
I want to setup a SMS system for Nagios on a 5.9 box.
I read in a blog that the two modems Huawei [ E160G | E176 ] work with 6.3.
Anybody any experience with those modems and do they work with 5.9?
Are there any other devices that are better/recommended?
Thanks
Jobst
--
186,262 miles/
37 matches
Mail list logo
