On 05/19/13 11:59, Philipp Duffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Plesk 11.0.9 on a Centos 5.5.
> A website on that box got hacked last week and malicious code got inserted
> into some html/php files. So I went to find out what happened...
>
> * yum update everything, also made sure I have the lates
Although you have not said
I hope you changed the ftp account password and didn't save it on your ftp
client program in cleartext (or anywhere else)
First time hack logins usually know the right credentials
Regards,
Andy Goy
IT Consultant
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@cent
> -Original Message-
> From: John R Pierce [mailto:pie...@hogranch.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 17:57
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] TPM and secure boot
>
> On 5/19/2013 2:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > your question was*clearly* secure boot
> > and before UEFI se
Hello all, I'm running CentOS 6.4.
Today I tried installing monodevelop and this is the result of the
installation:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/258829139
Now. When I went to my terminal and ran monodevelop... nothing. When
I tried to locate the actual executable by running
find . -name "*monode
Yves S. Garret wrote:
> Hello all, I'm running CentOS 6.4.
>
> Today I tried installing monodevelop and this is the result of the
> installation:
> http://bin.cakephp.org/view/258829139
>
> Now. When I went to my terminal and ran monodevelop... nothing. When
> I tried to locate the actual executa
I just tried that... weird...
$ rpm -ql monodevelop
package monodevelop is not installed
Even more weird, when I look at the list of installed packages, this
is what I see:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/455219047
It's as if monodevelop is not installed?
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:06:08 -0400
Yves S. Garret wrote:
> It's as if monodevelop is not installed?
Perhaps it isn't. Your initial post indicates that you have base, epel, extras
and updates repositories enabled. I have the same on this computer.
"yum search monodevelop" tells me "no matches f
>From here:
http://fealves78.blogspot.com/2012/08/install-mono-and-monodevelop-on-centos.html
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:06:08 -0400
> Yves S. Garret wrote:
>
> > It's as if monodevelop is not installed?
>
> Perhaps it isn't. Your initial post ind
Yves S. Garret wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
>
>> Yves S. Garret wrote:
>> > Hello all, I'm running CentOS 6.4.
>> >
>> > Today I tried installing monodevelop and this is the result of the
>> > installation:
>> > http://bin.cakephp.org/view/258829139
>> >
>> > Now. When I went
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:12:52AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> So where did you find the monodevelop rpm that you think you installed?
Why is mono-core unsigned?
John
--
The hardest part of raising a child is teaching them to ride bic
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:18:59PM -0400, Yves S. Garret wrote:
> >From here:
> http://fealves78.blogspot.com/2012/08/install-mono-and-monodevelop-on-centos.html
That's an unvetted repo that is mentioned in that article, and from the
looks of it is providing unsigned packages? Bleah.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:12:52AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> >
> > So where did you find the monodevelop rpm that you think you installed?
>
> Why is mono-core unsigned?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:22 PM, wrote:
> Yves S. Garret wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> Yves S. Garret wrote:
> >> > Hello all, I'm running CentOS 6.4.
> >> >
> >> > Today I tried installing monodevelop and this is the result of the
> >> > installation:
> >> > http:
On Mon, 20 May 2013 12:25:38 -0500
John R. Dennison wrote:
> That's an unvetted repo that is mentioned in that article, and from the
> looks of it is providing unsigned packages? Bleah.
I also don't see any place where they are providing source rpms in their repo,
though I didn't spend a whole l
Yves S. Garret wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:22 PM, wrote:
>> Yves S. Garret wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
>> >> Yves S. Garret wrote:
>> >> > Hello all, I'm running CentOS 6.4.
>> >> >
>> >> > Today I tried installing monodevelop and this is the result of the
>> >> >
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:02 PM, wrote:
> Yves S. Garret wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:22 PM, wrote:
> >> Yves S. Garret wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
> >> >> Yves S. Garret wrote:
> >> >> > Hello all, I'm running CentOS 6.4.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Today I tried ins
On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:23:51 -0400
Yves S. Garret wrote:
> And yes, I knew I was taking a risk. To be honest, I wasn't sure what
> to do next after hitting my head against the wall so much, hence such
> drastic measure.
You may be asking the wrong question.
What were/are you trying to accompli
On Sun, 19 May 2013 18:36:57 +, Beartooth wrote:
Oops! I spoke too soon. It's doing it again. I killed
NetworkManager again, no joy; yum remove NetworkManager, no joy.
Service network start fumbles a while, and eventually gets
RTNETLINK answers: File exists (and th
Beartooth wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 18:36:57 +, Beartooth wrote:
>
> Oops! I spoke too soon. It's doing it again. I killed
> NetworkManager again, no joy; yum remove NetworkManager, no joy.
>
> Service network start fumbles a while, and eventually gets
>
> RTNETLINK answers
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:23:51 -0400
> Yves S. Garret wrote:
>
> > And yes, I knew I was taking a risk. To be honest, I wasn't sure what
> > to do next after hitting my head against the wall so much, hence such
> > drastic measure.
>
> You may be
On 5/20/2013 10:33 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I also don't see any place where they are providing source rpms in their repo,
> though I didn't spend a whole lot of time searching. Therefore, it would be
> difficult/impossible to check their spec file and see what that package
> actually does and where
On Mon, 20 May 2013 12:25:08 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 10:33 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > I also don't see any place where they are providing source rpms in their
> > repo, though I didn't spend a whole lot of time searching. Therefore, it
> > would be difficult/impossible to check th
On 5/20/2013 12:28 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> It's entirely possible that I'm missing something, but how does that tell me
> what pre- and post-install steps the rpm does, or what patches are applied to
> the binaries? All I get is a list of files and directories. I don't think
> it's possible to ext
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 12:56 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 12:28 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > It's entirely possible that I'm missing something, but how does that tell me
> > what pre- and post-install steps the rpm does, or what patches are applied
> > to
> > the binaries? All I get is a
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:04 PM, SilverTip257
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:42 PM, SilverTip257 >wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Dave Johansen <
> davejohan...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:59:35PM +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> The problem the OP has comes from the fact that the rpm is not signed,
> so it must be installed with the --nogpgcheck option to yum. Without the
> option IIRC yum complains about the missing signature and does not
> install the pac
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 16:15 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:59:35PM +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> > The problem the OP has comes from the fact that the rpm is not signed,
> > so it must be installed with the --nogpgcheck option to yum. Without the
> > option IIRC yum c
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 06:44 AM, Tucker wrote:
> > *Succinct Version*
> > Is there a way to, using updates.img, monkey patching or swapping in a
> > newer Anaconda (>= 16) to force all disks to have gpt labels and not just
> > disks> 2TB?
> >
>
> ye
Hello CentOS !
Iam trying to configure a Dual Core 1.6Ghz AMD E-350 machine to be able
NIC (eth0) interrupts the most efficient way possible so that I can be
able to handle the large number of random source packets per second.
Currently running CentOS 6.4 2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64, i made some
On 5/20/2013 9:53 PM, Alex Flex wrote:
> a.) Could anyody please help me with a solution so that iam able to
> balance equally the interrupts on both cores?
> b.) Is there anyway to actually assign more interrupts to this IRQ (25)
> or is that something that the kernel discretly takes care of?
afa
Hello again guys,
Iam trying to asses the best hardware for a machine that procceses a
high number of packets per second on its NIC. THe only way I can achieve
this without guesses is If iam able to understand or test what the
number of interrupts available per core and how to translate that to
On 5/20/2013 10:07 PM, Alex Flex wrote:
> Iam trying to asses the best hardware for a machine that procceses a
> high number of packets per second on its NIC. THe only way I can achieve
> this without guesses is If iam able to understand or test what the
> number of interrupts available per core an
John,
We run a reverse proxy so our CPU need for that is very small, plus we
get syn flooded often.. which is why we have the need to be able to load
between cores, i think it is justified.
Thanks
Alex
On 05/20/2013 10:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 9:53 PM, Alex Flex wrote:
>> a.)
John,
On 05/20/2013 10:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> afaik, IRQs from a single device have to be handled serially, you can't
> have more than one active IRQ at the same time.
>
> so there's really no point in distributing them across multiple CPU
> cores. let the other cores handle user space a
On 5/20/2013 10:39 PM, Alex Flex wrote:
> In summary, its very easy to hit a low number of packets/second flood
> and have the server start looking legitimate ones. I find it hard to
> believe that one cannot benefit from load balancing the interrupts?
how many network adapters do you have?
you c
Hello again John, I only have one network adapter. GigE.
Perhaps anybody else can give me another suggestion in order to achieve
this?
Thanks
Alex
On 05/20/2013 11:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 10:39 PM, Alex Flex wrote:
>> In summary, its very easy to hit a low number of packets/
On 5/20/2013 10:24 PM, Alex Flex wrote:
> We run a reverse proxy so our CPU need for that is very small, plus we
> get syn flooded often.. which is why we have the need to be able to load
> between cores, i think it is justified.
IRQ handlers are not reentrant, as the hardware can't deal with it.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Philipp Duffner wrote:
>
> I think I really hit a snag with this one - I have no idea where to go
> forward from here.
> I'd appreciate any ideas.
>
I use aide (akin to tripwire) to keep file signature db. The online
db file is immutable but I also keep a copy o
Hi,
I have a process which is running as a linux service and assigns IP addresses
using netlink to configued interface in linux.
For IPv4 addresses i do not see any issue with this assignment.
When i try to assign an IPv6 address, the address gets assigned successfully to
the interface, but th
Thanks John!,
I understand now. I think there are some NICs that have different queues
which are connected to the kernel in the form of different IRQs, and as
thus can be load balanced nicely. Ive seen that on 10GigE NICs.. but iam
wondering if by any chance you know if the one suggested can do su
40 matches
Mail list logo
