On 11/05/13 14:48, Rock wrote:
>> For the record, this is the Microsoft Support KB I had followed:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/176646
> Just by way of update, it's currently at 95,000 of about
> 100,000 files; so I would expect the Recuva file recovery
> to complete by tomorrow morning (da
On Sat, 11 May 2013 21:27:59 +1000, Anthony K wrote:
> I'd suggest you still make a copy of the disk with dd and
> work on the image!
Since I may only get one shot, and since I've never formatted
a USB hard drive, nor ever even mounted one, how does this procedure
look for my 149GB NTFS disk?
On 11/05/13 22:56, Rock wrote:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 21:27:59 +1000, Anthony K wrote:
>
>> I'd suggest you still make a copy of the disk with dd and
>> work on the image!
> Key questions:
> Q0. Should I boot to my normal Centos 6 OS?
> Q1: Should I format the new USB hard disk with Fdisk?
> Q2: W
On 05/09/2013 04:41 PM, Rock wrote:
> My 15GB backup USB drive somehow got "corrupted" such that
> a "chkdsk /f E:" on WinXP removed the file allocation table
> (or whatever) making the NTFS drive appear empty.
>
> I tried Windows Recuva freeware to recover the files, and
> it has been working for
On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:23:35 -0400, Fred Roller wrote:
> There are some linux solutions I had at the time and I
> am trying to dig up my notes.
Thanks if you can find them.
Currently I'm at day 3, and almost done recovering the
files; but the results (sadly, due to my error in the
Recuva sett
On Thu, 9 May 2013 23:35:35 -0400
Steve Blackwell wrote:
> On Thu, 09 May 2013 10:49:01 +0200
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> > On 05/09/2013 03:29 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> > > Lexmark 2600
> > Download this driver :
> > http://downloads.lexmark.com/downloads/cpd/lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-
On Sat, 11 May 2013 15:35:31 +, Rock wrote:
> Currently I'm at day 3, and almost done recovering the
> files; but the results (sadly, due to my error in the
> Recuva settings) are flatter than the plains of Kansas!
Just for the record, Recuva finished at 66 hours:
http://www5.picturepush.c
On Sat, 11 May 2013 15:18:50 -0400
Steve Blackwell wrote:
> Well, no luck.
>
> # ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
> Collecting info for this system...
> Operating system: linux
> CPU Arch: x86_64
> Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
You'll apparently need
> # ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
> CPU Arch: x86_64
> Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
> ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode:
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
Your system is pure 64bit; no 3
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 19:18 +, Rock wrote:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 15:35:31 +, Rock wrote:
>
> > Currently I'm at day 3, and almost done recovering the
> > files; but the results (sadly, due to my error in the
> > Recuva settings) are flatter than the plains of Kansas!
>
> Just for the re
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:35 -0400
Stephen Harris wrote:
> > # ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
>
> > CPU Arch: x86_64
> > Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
>
> > ./startupinstaller.sh:
> > bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF
On 05/12/2013 12:23 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:35 -0400
> Stephen Harris wrote:
>
>>> # ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
>>> CPU Arch: x86_64
>>> Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
>>> ./startupinstaller.sh:
>>> bin/linux/x86/libc
On Sun, 12 May 2013 01:35:22 +0200
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 05/12/2013 12:23 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:35 -0400
> > Stephen Harris wrote:
> >
> >>> # ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
> >>> CPU Arch: x86_64
> >>> Warning: No installer for "x86_64"
13 matches
Mail list logo
