Re: [CentOS] ECC memory errors

2013-05-07 Thread John Doe
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us" > John Doe wrote: >> The ISOSs are downloadable... >> Google "firmware maintenance cd" and check the "version > history" to get >> the latest one. Then, try the "release notes" to see if you find > your >> server model (not always listed). If not, go back a few vers

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 2

2013-05-07 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] dual head on centos 5 and ancient Nvidia Quadro NVS280SD card

2013-05-07 Thread Ross Walker
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > I was just handed a 2nd monitor for my system at work, and using Centos 5 > (latest) > can't make dual head work. a good bit of googling isn't being particularly > helpful either. > Dual head or dual monitor? Dual head typically means running t

[CentOS] deleting Cyrus mailbox with empty name

2013-05-07 Thread Tilman Schmidt
A junior administrator of mine mistakenly created a mailbox with an empty name, by typing into cyradm the commands: createmailbox user/$lb setquota user/$lb 1 He will of course shortly receive an extra lesson on shell variables, but meanwhile I find myself confronted with the problem how to g

Re: [CentOS] dual head on centos 5 and ancient Nvidia Quadro NVS280SD card

2013-05-07 Thread Ross Walker
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Fred Smith > wrote: > >> I was just handed a 2nd monitor for my system at work, and using Centos 5 >> (latest) >> can't make dual head work. a good bit of googling isn't being particularly >> helpful either. >>

Re: [CentOS] deleting Cyrus mailbox with empty name

2013-05-07 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Thanks, I found the solution. The name of the bad mailbox wasn't in fact empty, but a single blank character which the cyradm and quota commands dutifully removed as "leading blank" in their output. So localhost> sam "user/ " cyrus all localhost> dm "user/ " was what it took to get rid of the mai

Re: [CentOS] dual head on centos 5 and ancient Nvidia Quadro NVS280SD card

2013-05-07 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:09:13PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Fred Smith > > wrote: > > > >> I was just handed a 2nd monitor for my system at work, and using Centos 5 > >> (latest) > >> can't make dual head

Re: [CentOS] dual head on centos 5 and ancient Nvidia Quadro NVS280SD card

2013-05-07 Thread Ross Walker
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:09:13PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Fred Smith < > fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>wrote: > > > > > >> I was just handed a 2n

[CentOS] Trying to justify CentOS vs. RHEL

2013-05-07 Thread Bidwell, Christopher
Hi all, I'm in the process of moving all of my RHEL systems over to CentOS but the argument that fires back at me is for critical vulnerabilities for items such as zero-day exploits and such. >From what I've been reading, RHEL releases critical patches much quicker than CentOS which makes sense si

Re: [CentOS] Trying to justify CentOS vs. RHEL

2013-05-07 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Tuesday 07 May 2013, "Bidwell, Christopher" wrote: > My question is what kind of time frame are we looking at when a > vulnerability (critical or high) is announced and a patch has been > released for RHEL does it get implemented into CentOS? >From the FAQ, http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/Gener

Re: [CentOS] Trying to justify CentOS vs. RHEL

2013-05-07 Thread Bidwell, Christopher
Thanks for that quick response! I guess I should have looked closer through the wiki. Much appreciated! On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Tuesday 07 May 2013, "Bidwell, Christopher" > wrote: > > > My question is what kind of time frame are we looking at when a > >

Re: [CentOS] Trying to justify CentOS vs. RHEL

2013-05-07 Thread m . roth
Bidwell, Christopher wrote: > Thanks for that quick response! I guess I should have looked closer > through the wiki. Much appreciated! > Please don't top post. One suggestion: if you have a number of systems, buy at least one RHEL license - that way, you can ask for enhancements, bugfixes, and

Re: [CentOS] ECC memory errors

2013-05-07 Thread Nathan Duehr
On May 6, 2013, at 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Interesting. I need to look at them further. > > HOWEVER: I saw something there about unpacking an .exe... and googled > that, and found someone talking about doing that... which led me to > cabextract, and, sure 'nough, I now have what was in

Re: [CentOS] Trying to justify CentOS vs. RHEL

2013-05-07 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Bidwell, Christopher > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 17:12 > > Hi all, > > I'm in the process of moving all of my RHEL systems over to Why all? Lets keep that question in the back of our minds. > CentOS but the argument that fires back at me is for critical