On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Gary Hodder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> anyone know when lxde will be available for centos?
>
Doubtful we'll see LXDE in the official repos. [1] See the note at the
previous link about Openbox packages.
LXDE is something that EPEL or other repos might package to suppl
Also make sure installed all KDE stuff...
yum groupinstall -y base-x kde-desktop
Then, make sure in your /etc/sysconfig/desktop you have this:
DISPLAYMANAGER=KDE
That's all I am doing and KDE runs great for me on CentOS 5.x and/or 6.x
HTH,
Flossy
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Michel Donais wrote:
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Sorry, I accidentally deleted the lxde thread, (on mail where I just use
POP3) so headers may be broken for some of you.
Anyway, ScientificLinux forums have a post about building lxde. It is time
consuming, but if you really want it
It's using Fedora 14 as the version and has links to necess
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:33:31AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Sorry, I accidentally deleted the lxde thread, (on mail where I just use
> POP3) so headers may be broken for some of you.
>
> Anyway, ScientificLinux forums have a post about building lxde. It is time
> consuming, but if you really
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:50:38 -0400
>> Michel Donais wrote:
>>
>>> > What do you have in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts?
>>
>>> ifcfg-eth0
>>> ifcfg-eth1
>>
>> What are the contents of these tegining;
>
> The content of these two files was t
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
> sets DISPLAY to :0.0, which I know is not a good idea, and I can fix.
I'd thought that :0.0 was the norm
On 2013-04-26, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>
>> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
>> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
>> sets DISPLAY to :0.0, which I know is not a good idea, and
Keith Keller wrote:
>>
>>I'd thought that :0.0 was the norm.
>
> It is, but it's not a hard and fast rule. If you are running multiple
> local X consoles, for example, they can't all be :0.0. I've also seen
> different identifiers when one X session is hung and/or doesn't finish
> cleanly before
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Keith Keller
wrote:
>
>>> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
>>> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
>>> sets DISPLAY to :0.0, which I know is not a good idea, and I can fix.
>>
>> I'd though
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> I've just test an ATI FirePro 2460 graphics card on CentOS 6.4. It
> connects 4 monitors.
> It worked with the standard radeon driver. I was able to arrange the
> monitors into my
> preferred configuration (as a square array, 1 upper left,
On 26/04/13 10:36, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-04-26, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>>
>>> I'm on Fedora 6.3. After a reboot, some proprietary software didn't want
>>> to run. I found out that the startup script for said software manually
>>> sets DISPLAY
On 2013-04-26, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>
> Sorry, brain fart, I'm running CentOS 6.3, not Fedora. The weird thing
> is that this changed after a reboot. I haven't done any updates that
> seem relevant lately either.
>
> And yes, I know :0.0 shouldn't be depended on, but it seems weird that
> it'd
13 matches
Mail list logo
