Re: [CentOS] Supermicro & Boot Failures with DVD Centos 6.2

2013-04-22 Thread Laurent Wandrebeck
. Hi there. Had a similar problem, there is a bug in isolinux, that have been updated in 6.1 Boot a 6.0 should do the trick. It did for me. HTH, -- Laurent Wandrebeck HYGEOS, Earth Observation Department / Observation de la Terre Euratechnologies 165 Avenue de Bretagne 59000 Lille, France tel: +

Re: [CentOS] Having difficulty exporting display

2013-04-22 Thread Anthony K
On 19/04/13 06:42, Yves S. Garret wrote: > Hello, > > This is my issue, my remote machine (CentOS 6.3, hosted in Azure windows > environment) has an application that I need to test on my local box (CentOS > 6.4, a laptop behind a router). > > Now, this is what I'm doing and the issue that I'm encou

Re: [CentOS] Having difficulty exporting display

2013-04-22 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/22/2013 3:09 AM, Anthony K wrote: >> $ xhost + >> >$ ssh -xsomeusern...@somehostname.net -p 49283 > I don't believe you need to export DISPLAY, it should already be set by > virtue of using -X. Try omitting the export below and just run xclock. > That ought to work. you also don't need the

[CentOS] Writing to a symlink on a read-only file system that land on a read-write file system

2013-04-22 Thread James Pearson
We've come across a problem with 6.4 kernels that we didn't have with 6.2 kernels - which involves writing to a symlink that is on a read-only file system - but the symlink lands on a read-write file system The following shows the issue: mkdir -p /mnt/tmp mount -t tmpfs -o size=1% none /mnt

Re: [CentOS] Writing to a symlink on a read-only file system that land on a read-write file system

2013-04-22 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/22/2013 08:42 AM, James Pearson wrote: > We've come across a problem with 6.4 kernels that we didn't have with > 6.2 kernels - which involves writing to a symlink that is on a read-only > file system - but the symlink lands on a read-write file system > > The following shows the issue: >

Re: [CentOS] Writing to a symlink on a read-only file system that land on a read-write file system

2013-04-22 Thread James Pearson
Michael Mol wrote: > > This sounds like it's going to be a glibc issue rather than a kernel > issue; IIRC, it's glibc that's responsible for handling symlink > processing, not the kernel. It fails on a 6.2 install running a 6.4 kernel (i.e. the same glibc) > (As for whether or not it's a bug...t

Re: [CentOS] Supermicro & Boot Failures with DVD Centos 6.2

2013-04-22 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
. Hi there. Had a similar problem, there is a bug in isolinux, that have been updated in 6.1 Boot a 6.0 should do the trick. It did for me. HTH, - Laurent, That is interesting !!! We tried to boot do the i386 and then an x64 6.4

[CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread Mayur Patil
Hello, I have trapped in weird problem. My Setup is CentOS 6.3 Desktop edition x86_64 arch. My login screen is blinking so frequently that I am unable to see and login into it. And also I am unable to reinstall the OS because it will take very long time re-setup everything as per my configura

Re: [CentOS] Supermicro & Boot Failures with DVD Centos 6.2

2013-04-22 Thread Laurent Wandrebeck
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:25:42 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote: > Laurent, > > That is interesting !!! > > We tried to boot do the i386 and then an x64 6.4 install discs this > morning, and were stopped at the familiar first line. Do you know if > anyone has put in a bug report on this? Well…I 

Re: [CentOS] Supermicro & Boot Failures with DVD Centos 6.2

2013-04-22 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:25:42 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote: > Laurent, > > That is interesting !!! > > We tried to boot do the i386 and then an x64 6.4 install discs this > morning, and were stopped at the familiar first line. Do you know if > anyone has put in a bug report on this? Well…I

Re: [CentOS] Writing to a symlink on a read-only file system that land on a read-write file system

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
James Pearson wrote: > We've come across a problem with 6.4 kernels that we didn't have with > 6.2 kernels - which involves writing to a symlink that is on a read-only > file system - but the symlink lands on a read-write file system > > The following shows the issue: > > mkdir -p /mnt/tmp > mo

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread Mayur Patil
Hello, One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer screen back in action that will be a great help to me. And I also want to ask that is it possible to install that files from

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
Mayur Patil wrote: > Hello, > > One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for > GUI of the centos. > > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer > screen back in action There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing. You should have command

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread Mayur Patil
Hello Sir, > > One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for > > GUI of the centos. > > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer > screen back in action > > There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing. You should have command > line log

Re: [CentOS] Supermicro & Boot Failures with DVD Centos 6.2

2013-04-22 Thread Johan Vermeulen
verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
Mayur Patil wrote: > >> > One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible >> for GUI of the centos. >> > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer >> screen back in action >> >> There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing. You should have comman

Re: [CentOS] Writing to a symlink on a read-only file system that land on a read-write file system

2013-04-22 Thread James Pearson
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > James Pearson wrote: > >>We've come across a problem with 6.4 kernels that we didn't have with >>6.2 kernels - which involves writing to a symlink that is on a read-only >>file system - but the symlink lands on a read-write file system >> >>The following shows the issue:

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread Mayur Patil
Hello Sir, sorry for late reply. >>> One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible > >> for GUI of the centos. > >> > If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer > >> screen back in action > >> > >> There is no "explorer" - that's a Windows thing.

Re: [CentOS] "Can't find root device" with lvm root after moving drive on CentOS 6.3

2013-04-22 Thread Joakim Ziegler
On 01/04/13 16:53, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > On 30/03/13 7:18, Joakim Ziegler wrote: >> On 29/03/13 10:38, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> On 03/29/2013 01:23 AM, Joakim Ziegler wrote: Immediately after getting dropped to rdshell, I looked around in /dev, which brought me a few surprises... > >>>

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-04-22 Thread Joakim Ziegler
On 25/03/13 18:09, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > On 24/03/13 4:01, Nux! wrote: >> On 24.03.2013 02:27, Joakim Ziegler wrote: >>> I have a recently installed Mellanox VPI interface in my server. This >>> is >>> an InfiniBand interface, which, through the use of adapters, can also >>> do >>> 10GbE over fib

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
Mayur Patil wrote: One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible >>> for GUI of the centos. >> You should have command line login using >> >> >> > Problem is Appearance of login window. System boots normally; now I >> > will try out your said command. >> >> gnome or

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-04-22 Thread Nux!
On 22.04.2013 18:11, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > Hello, I'm just trying to get back to this, since no one has answered > my > questions... Is this really a very difficult thing to accomplish? Hi, Can you make a short list of what you tried and did not work? I've already lost count. Lucian -- Sen

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-04-22 Thread Joakim Ziegler
I've tried various combinations of HOTPLUG=yes and no, and MANAGED=yes and no, then someone asked me if this was really not managed, so I posted the dmesg output above. -- Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal joa...@terminalmx.com - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0864

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-04-22 Thread Eero Volotinen
http://www.putorius.net/2012/10/how-to-configure-static-ip-address-in.html 2013/4/22 Joakim Ziegler > I've tried various combinations of HOTPLUG=yes and no, and MANAGED=yes > and no, then someone asked me if this was really not managed, so I > posted the dmesg output above. > > -- > Joakim Zieg

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread Mayur Patil
Hello Mark Sir, Sorry if you feel bad due to my foolishness and inadequate knowledge. My actual problem is that my setup is at college and due to internet connectivity problems as well as college hours are over, I am responding from home. So as per your instructions I will again go

[CentOS] Upgrading 6.3 to 6.4 "kdump: mkdumprd: failed to make kdump initrd" should I be concerned?

2013-04-22 Thread P J
Howdy, Running a round of updates from 6.3 to 6.4 and I'm seeing the following on all the servers. Want to make sure I'm not going to end up with a kernel panic if I reboot into the new kernel or have any other issues. Apr 22 11:10:21 www kdump: kexec: unloaded kdump kernel Apr 22 11:10:21 www k

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

2013-04-22 Thread Mayur Patil
Hello, My X windows system is not working So, Mark sir has recommended following steps that what I understand: 1 Press ctrl+alt+f2 2. Then run these commands yum groupinstall basic-desktop desktop-platform >> install installs video drivers; if you add a desktop instal

[CentOS] gwenview WITHOUT nepomuk

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
Does anyone know how to make gwenview *not* try to use nepomuk? I liked it under 5.x, but in 6.x it *constantly* complains about things like tagging is not enabled... but won't open, when I log in, with gwenview running and showing the same picture I'd logged out on. Then there are the random crash

[CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
I see a really good price, and better for quantity, for 3TB drives. Now, I've been down on WD for a couple of years, since I found that they'd protected certain h/d parms from being changed (like TLER). The ones I'm looking at are the Red, which seems to be a new color (at least to me), and one tec

Re: [CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

2013-04-22 Thread Tom Bishop
They are made more for the soho environment, not sure I would even use them there. If its critical enough for RAID environment then I would use the enterprise class drives WD-RE or the Seagate equiv. IIRC they were not even spinning those at 7200rpm, i just pony up for the good ones, and I'm chea

Re: [CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
Tom Bishop wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, wrote: > >> I see a really good price, and better for quantity, for 3TB drives. Now, >> I've been down on WD for a couple of years, since I found that they'd >> protected certain h/d parms from being changed (like TLER). The ones I'm >> looking

Re: [CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

2013-04-22 Thread Tom Bishop
Sure but if you read WD on documentation on at least parity RAID requirements, that specify URE 10^15, and these list out to 10^14. If you are going to run RAID 5 or 6 with the 3gb disks, sounds like that might not be the best situation but something to think about. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:09

Re: [CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

2013-04-22 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/22/2013 1:18 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > Sure but if you read WD on documentation on at least parity RAID > requirements, that specify URE 10^15, and these list out to 10^14. If you > are going to run RAID 5 or 6 with the 3gb disks, sounds like that might not > be the best situation but something

Re: [CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
Tom Please don't top post. Tom Bishop wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, wrote: > >> Tom Bishop wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, wrote: >> > >> >> I see a really good price, and better for quantity, for 3TB drives. >> >> Now, I've been down on WD for a couple of years, sin

Re: [CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/22/2013 1:18 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: >> Sure but if you read WD on documentation on at least parity RAID >> requirements, that specify URE 10^15, and these list out to 10^14. If >> you are going to run RAID 5 or 6 with the 3gb disks, sounds like that might >> not be the b

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-04-22 Thread Joakim Ziegler
Do I need to disable NetworkManager for everything to make this work? As I'd mentioned before, the problem isn't that the interface doesn't come up on boot, it does, but since it's a point to point interface, when I reboot the computer on the other end, it goes down and doesn't come back up aut

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-04-22 Thread m . roth
Joakim Ziegler wrote: > Do I need to disable NetworkManager for everything to make this work? > > As I'd mentioned before, the problem isn't that the interface doesn't > come up on boot, it does, but since it's a point to point interface, > when I reboot the computer on the other end, it goes down

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-04-22 Thread Joakim Ziegler
It's not an InfiniBand connection per se. It's a Mellanox VPI card, which has IB ports that can be configured to be 10GbE, through an adapter and fiber transciever. I've currently got one of its two ports set up to be 10GbE, and it shows up as eth2. The other port on the card, which is configur