Le 08/04/2013 02:23, mark a écrit :
> On 04/07/13 19:53, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:35:17PM -0400, mark wrote:
ls -l /dev/fd?
What do you see?
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 7 15:03 /dev/fd -> /proc/self/fd/
>>
>> Interesting as that doesn't m
On 04/08/13 04:43, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Le 08/04/2013 02:23, mark a écrit :
>> On 04/07/13 19:53, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:35:17PM -0400, mark wrote:
>
> ls -l /dev/fd?
>
> What do you see?
>
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 7 15:03 /dev
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 15:45 -0400, mark wrote:
> Yes, really. I've got hundreds of the damn things here at home, and I
> want to go through them and get rid of them all.
>
> But... to do that I want to read them. I have both a 5.25" and a 3.5"
> drive, both are plugged in, but in the BIOS, all I
On 04/07/2013 07:26 PM, mark wrote:
> On 04/07/13 19:53, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:35:17PM -0400, mark wrote:
ls -l /dev/fd?
What do you see?
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 7 15:03 /dev/fd -> /proc/self/fd/
>> Interesting as that doesn't match the
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:45 PM, mark wrote:
> Yes, really. I've got hundreds of the damn things here at home, and I
> want to go through them and get rid of them all.
>
> But... to do that I want to read them. I have both a 5.25" and a 3.5"
> drive, both are plugged in, but in the BIOS, all I see
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I saw in an earlier part of the thread, you were trying to do things to
> A: ... A: is a windows device, not a Linux device
>
> Make sure you are trying to do things to /dev/fd0 and not A:
Oh, of course. I was trying mdir, I think - that's an mtools thing - they
use a: inte
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
If "ls -l /dev/fd0*" does not show a series of device nodes try:
>> It does - /dev/fd0, along with all 14 sizes of floppies, of a patter
>> /dev/fd0u
>>
>
> I saw in an earlier part of the thread, you were trying to do things to
> A: ...
Hi, Louis,
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 15:45 -0400, mark wrote:
>> Yes, really. I've got hundreds of the damn things here at home, and I
>> want to go through them and get rid of them all.
>>
>> But... to do that I want to read them. I have both a 5.25" and a 3.5"
>> drive, both
mark writes:
>
> On 04/07/13 16:22, Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:18:29 -0400
> > mark wrote:
> >
> >> All of 'em are old DOS. Just tried mdir a:, and the same: can't open,
> >> can't initials A:. I really doubt the drives themselves are dead, but
> >
> > Floppy disks have a fi
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, David G. Miller wrote:
> mark writes:
>
>>
>> On 04/07/13 16:22, Frank Cox wrote:
>>> On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:18:29 -0400
>>> mark wrote:
>>>
All of 'em are old DOS. Just tried mdir a:, and the same: can't open,
can't initials A:. I really doubt the drives themselves
Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, David G. Miller wrote:
>> mark writes:
>>> On 04/07/13 16:22, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:18:29 -0400
mark wrote:
> All of 'em are old DOS. Just tried mdir a:, and the same: can't open,
> can't initials A:. I really doubt t
On 4/8/2013 9:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That was in the context of the 'mtools' programs - which do map the
> devices to dos-like letters but failed in the same way with a problem
> with the underlying device. But as someone else mentioned, if 2
> drives are plugged in, it may be trying the wro
On 4/8/2013 7:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Good thought... but I think I had one of them disconnected before I took
> my system down yesterday and connected both. I will note that the 5.25"
> one's light does seem to stay on, regardless.
OH. another rusty old memory. if you plugged a floppy
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 12:21 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> That I don't know, and was trying to think of a way to test it. As I noted
> in another post, the 5.25" light seems to stay on, and I *think* that was
> the one I had disconnected before. I also think I mentioned that after
> bringing it
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/8/2013 7:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Good thought... but I think I had one of them disconnected before I took
>> my system down yesterday and connected both. I will note that the 5.25"
>> one's light does seem to stay on, regardless.
>
> OH. another rusty old mem
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 12:21 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> That I don't know, and was trying to think of a way to test it. As I
>> noted in another post, the 5.25" light seems to stay on, and I *think*
that
>> was the one I had disconnected before. I also think I menti
On 4/8/2013 9:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> OH! I thought, since the m/b is from '05 or '06, that it would detect the
> floppy drives, but*that* I need to look at. Thanks!
the floppy interface was really low level.all parallel signals, like
select drive, step, direction, head select, seri
CentOS 6.4, clean install.
Zimbra 8.0.3
I am behind a PfSense box using a virtual IP. So the IP of the box is
192.168.1.27
I entered this in /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4
localhost4.localdomain4
::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6
localhost
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/8/2013 9:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> OH! I thought, since the m/b is from '05 or '06, that it would detect
>> the floppy drives, but*that* I need to look at. Thanks!
>
> the floppy interface was really low level.all parallel signals, like
> select drive, step,
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> CentOS 6.4, clean install.
> Zimbra 8.0.3
>
> I am behind a PfSense box using a virtual IP. So the IP of the box is
> 192.168.1.27
>
> I entered this in /etc/hosts:
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4
> localhost4.localdomain4
> ::1 loc
Hi Mark,
I did a reboot and not `hostname -f` says: mail.
But I think that will still be wrong in terms of what Zimbra is looking for.
When I did the install I set the hostname to `webserver.localdomain`, so I
see in /var/log/messages:
`Apr 7 12:35:48 webserver kernel: SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0 ->
On 04/08/2013 01:35 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I did a reboot and not `hostname -f` says: mail.
>
> But I think that will still be wrong in terms of what Zimbra is looking for.
>
> When I did the install I set the hostname to `webserver.localdomain`, so I
> see in /var/log/mes
On 4/8/2013 11:17 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> but `hostname -f` says:
>
> $ hostname -f
> hostname: Unknown host
put the hostname in /etc/sysconfig/network, as ..
HOSTNAME=full.domain.name.com
example...
$ more /etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING=yes
NETWORKING_IPV6=no
HOSTNAME=hostname.m
Hi Johnny:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING=yes
HOSTNAME=mail.meowbox.me
Jason
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 01:35 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I did a reboot and not `hostname -f` says: mail.
> >
> > But I think that wi
John,
Weird question, but if web and e-mail are going to be on the same box. Do I
need to do mail.hostname.tld or can I just to hostname.tld?
For the MeowBox.me domain.
for DNS A-record: @ is the public IP
A-record mail is the public IP.
Mx record is 0 mail mail.meowbox.me
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013
On 4/8/2013 11:52 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Weird question, but if web and e-mail are going to be on the same box. Do I
> need to do mail.hostname.tld or can I just to hostname.tld?
>
> For the MeowBox.me domain.
> for DNS A-record: @ is the public IP
> A-record mail is the public IP.
>
>
Thanks everyone for all of the help, I appreciate it.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:09 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/8/2013 11:52 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> > Weird question, but if web and e-mail are going to be on the same box.
> Do I
> > need to do mail.hostname.tld or can I just to
Dale Dellutri wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:45 PM, mark wrote:
>
>> Yes, really. I've got hundreds of the damn things here at home, and I
>> want to go through them and get rid of them all.
>>
>> But... to do that I want to read them. I have both a 5.25" and a 3.5"
>> drive, both are plugged i
Just updated one of our servers, and see a bunch of
udevd-event[8735]: run_program: ressize 256 too short
Along with
Apr 8 14:57:48 kernel: Breaking affinity for irq 209
Apr 8 14:57:48 kernel: CPU 8 is now offline
Apr 8 14:57:49 kernel: CPU 8 offline: Remove Rx thread
Apr 8 14:57:49 kerne
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 15:45 -0400, mark wrote:
>> Yes, really. I've got hundreds of the damn things here at home, and I
>> want to go through them and get rid of them all.
>>
>> But... to do that I want to read them. I have both a 5.25" and a 3.5"
>> dr
On 04/08/13 12:55, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 12:21 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> That I don't know, and was trying to think of a way to test it. As I noted
>> in another post, the 5.25" light seems to stay on, and I *think* that was
>> the one I had disconnected before. I
31 matches
Mail list logo
