On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 11:29 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/28/2013 11:11 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> > On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> >> >is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
> >> >subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
> > Yes. That's basica
On Mar 30, 2013, at 10:58, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Nouveau supports dual monitors on a single card just fine.
Yes, I have no problems with this either and have most of my users running
with two monitors and the nouveau driver. But I'm trying to set up one user
with 4 monitors now.
This morning
On 3/31/2013 12:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> WELL, I don't know what to say. I just put the HD in the PC turned
>> it on and was waiting for the blue screen so I could login as root and
>> type 'init 3'. BUT, guess what happened. A
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> It's the the job of your security
> perimeter firewalls to filter local vrs foreign packets and on-session
> vrs unsolicited packets.
You say that as though everyone has such tools. Or that they are such
an integrated part of the TCP/I
Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> On 3/31/2013 12:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Robert Benjamin
>> wrote:
>>> WELL, I don't know what to say. I just put the HD in the PC
>>> turned
>>> it on and was waiting for the blue screen so I could login as root and
>>> type '
On 4/1/2013 6:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> it's also very important to implement BCP (Best Common Practice) 38.
> BCP 38 recommends router egress filtering. That is, you only route out
> what will route back in. That prevents you (or any of your customers)
> from being a spoofing source.
On 4/1/2013 2:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> On 3/31/2013 12:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Robert Benjamin
>>> wrote:
WELL, I don't know what to say. I just put the HD in the PC
turned
it on and was waiting for th
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:07 PM, wrote:
>
> As I may have said, everyone I know in computers has a number of books
> from this publisher - he specializes in not only finding people who
> really, really know their subject, but CAN ALSO COMMUNICATE WHAT THEY KNOW
> (as opposed to, say, the BAL textb
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 13:44 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> Yes, installs that include X and a desktop will default to runlevel 5.
> Before trying 'startx' , do 'init 3' as root. That should shut down
> the existing session, but whatev
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:07 PM, wrote:
>>
>> As I may have said, everyone I know in computers has a number of books
>> from this publisher - he specializes in not only finding people who
>> really, really know their subject, but CAN ALSO COMMUNICATE WHAT THEY
>> KNOW (as opp
Hello,
I did df -h on my CentOS 6.4 machine.
$ df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg_ysg-lv_root
47G 8.8G 36G 20% /
tmpfs 948M 372K 947M 1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1 485M 62M 398M 14% /boot
/dev/mapper/v
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> Actually, it's pretty easy with netfilter / iptables. Other firewalls
> like pf filter on *BSD an proprietary work similar. If you know your
> inside networks you merely add a rule to block incoming packets on your
> external interfa
On 04/01/2013 09:00 PM, Yves S. Garret wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did df -h on my CentOS 6.4 machine.
>
> $ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/vg_ysg-lv_root 47G 8.8G 36G 20% / tmpfs
> 948M 372K 947M 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 485M 62M 398M
>
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:17 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/1/2013 6:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > it's also very important to implement BCP (Best Common Practice) 38.
> > BCP 38 recommends router egress filtering. That is, you only route out
> > what will route back in. That prevents
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:46 PM, wrote:
>>>
>> I don't' know anything about this book or publisher, but you really
>
> Les, you don't know O'Reilly? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you. Almost
> every programmer I know, and every admin, had somewhere between one
> O'Reilly book and a full shelf of the
Hi, thanks for your response.
One more question. Would I need to have logical volumes or can I get away
with
having one massive volume/partition and then have everything on that one
partition?
In the interim I'll have a directory in / that I can use to just dump stuff
in and will
rebuild my mach
Yves S. Garret wrote:
> Hi, thanks for your response.
>
> One more question. Would I need to have logical volumes or can I get away
> with having one massive volume/partition and then have everything on
> that one partition?
>
> In the interim I'll have a directory in / that I can use to just dump
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>>
> AFA how BIND should be shipped... Last time I looked (just a couple of
> days ago) BIND ships in a fairly secure manner (local caching resolver
> listening on localhost only) and the default IP tables blocks DNS
> queries and respons
On 2013-04-01, Yves S. Garret wrote:
>
> $ df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/vg_ysg-lv_root
>47G 8.8G 36G 20% /
> tmpfs 948M 372K 947M 1% /dev/shm
> /dev/sda1 485M 62M 398M 14% /boot
> /dev/m
On 4/1/2013 12:00 PM, Yves S. Garret wrote:
> What I don't understand is why is /home so tiny and how can I re-partition
> this without having to nuke and rebuild my machine?
what do you get from
# vgs
?
if there's VFree, you can lvextend the backing LV behind /home, then
grow the file sy
Greetings,
I've read reports that there has been degradation in Internet traffic over
the last month. Until today, I haven't experienced any. However, getting
bank record data from chase.com here in NYC seems impossible.
I also noticed erratic ftp behavior today; connections can be made but
data
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 18:04 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Greetings,
> I've read reports that there has been degradation in Internet traffic over
> the last month. Until today, I haven't experienced any. However, getting
> bank record data from chase.com here in NYC seems impossible.
/me trying not
> the last month. Until today, I haven't experienced any. However, getting
> bank record data from chase.com here in NYC seems impossible.
What do you mean by "getting bank record data" ?
Every major US bank is under a constant DoS attack, which sometimes causes
the sites to be slow. This is unr
On 30/03/13 7:18, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> On 29/03/13 10:38, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 03/29/2013 01:23 AM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>>> Immediately after getting dropped to rdshell, I looked around in /dev,
>>> which brought me a few surprises...
>>> /dev/mapper contains only "control", that is, "
Greetings,
Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
CentOS 6 machine:
ncftp /home/pyz2 > dir
connect failed: No route to host.
connect failed: No route to host.
connect failed: No route to host.
Falling back to PORT instead of PASV mode.
I can make a connection, bu
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2013 01:12, schrieb Max Pyziur:
>> Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
>> CentOS 6 machine:
>> ncftp /home/pyz2 > dir
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect fail
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, lists-centos wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
>> Date: Monday, April 01, 2013 07:12:53 PM -0400
>> From: Max Pyziur
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: [CentOS] Vsftpd configuration problem
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Beginning today, I started to
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2013 01:12, schrieb Max Pyziur:
>> Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
>> CentOS 6 machine:
>> ncftp /home/pyz2 > dir
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect fail
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2013 01:25, schrieb Max Pyziur:
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 02.04.2013 01:12, schrieb Max Pyziur:
Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
CentOS 6 machine:
ncftp
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2013 02:04, schrieb Max Pyziur:
>>> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config
>>> # Load additional iptables modules (nat helpers)
>>> # Default: -none-
>>> # Space separated list of nat helpers (e.g. 'ip_nat_ftp ip_nat_irc'),
Hi Max,
It looks like a network issue instead of the software. Falling back to
PORT sounds like to ACTIVE mode from PASV mode. In PASV, you will be
connecting to a random port told by server with a random port from your
side. Do you have a firewall to block such traffic that the system will
se
Hello all,
I have a couple problems with two Centos installs. One is my
Dedicated hosting plan. I have been trying very hard to build some strong
skills in system administration because the task apparently is more complex
than I imagined... or it appeared that way to a web developer, who r
On 4/1/2013 5:54 PM, Bruce Whealton wrote:
> Not it is the /etc
> partition that is full every other day. It is a 10GB partition and most of
> the data is in the mail spool directories.
the /etc directory A) shouldn't be a separate partition, it should be on
/ and B) should just contain system c
33 matches
Mail list logo
