Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
and nothing more happens. With the old kernel (2.6.32-279) it boots
fine. The motherbo
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm
wrote:
> Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
> it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
> screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
> and nothing more hap
On 28 March 2013 08:42, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm
> wrote:
>> Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
>> it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
>> screen shows a distorted image, a bit like
On 2013.03.27 16:59, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 03/27/2013 10:01 AM, Paul Norton wrote:
>> On 27 March 2013 13:09, ign...@vault13.lt wrote:
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> how do people cope with constant SELinux errors like this from Fusion
>>> Passenger:
>>>
>>> 36886. 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps unconfined_u:s
Hi Markus
could probably the legacy vga kernel parameter help you? or is the
frame-buffer mode no longer used by up-to-date boot processes?
vga = 791 : 1024x768@64K means: screen resolution 1024x768 pixels with
64K colors
vga = 788 : 800x600@64K means: screen resolution 800x600 pixels with 64K
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:14 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
>> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
>
> yes, they are ghost files, not reall
On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
>>> tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
>>> use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on eth0
Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin
>>> wrote:
> Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
use -v or -w for al
Most of my users are on kde, as am I (I really don't like gnome). I've got
one on gnome, though, CentOS 6.4, and I have a problem: I have to start an
agent running ->on login<-, so that the same one is in the environment of
every term window he opens. In kde, no problem, I modify
/etc/X11/xinit/xin
On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin
wrote:
>> Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
>tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdum
On 3/28/2013 10:13 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
> On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>> On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin
> wrote:
>>> Did you mean ping nytimes.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
> worth a try?
On 3/28/2013 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
>> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
>> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't
Robert Benjamin wrote:
> Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
> worth a try?Bob
you can always install KDE and
On 03/28/2013 07:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Most of my users are on kde, as am I (I really don't like gnome). I've got
> one on gnome, though, CentOS 6.4, and I have a problem: I have to start an
> agent running ->on login<-, so that the same one is in the environment of
> every term window h
On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
>> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
>> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
>> w
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
>> If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
>> desktop and there will be more people with similar configurations to
>> help sort out any other pro
On 3/28/2013 1:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
>>> I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
>>> If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
>>> desktop and there will be more people with similar
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
>> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
>> that's probably not the real solution. So when you established that
>> your network and DNS was working, Gnome was working too? Can you log
>> in on a virtual ch
I have 2 CentOS servers that are both authoritative DNS for several
domains and local resolvers.As configured, they are publicly visible
resolvers, which I've known for awhile is not a good thing.
whats the appropriate way of configuring the bind on CentOS 5.current to
not allow recursion o
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
> subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
Yes. That's basically it.
--
Jorge
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:25:31 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[]
>> And Usenet is effectively gone.
>
> It's still there. And some newsgroups are still busy, though not like in
> the good days of the early nineties.
Indeed, alas! But there is Gmane, which is a huge
On 3/28/2013 11:11 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with the appropriate private
>> >subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
> Yes. That's basically it.
k, thanks, looks like its working!
--
john r pierce
Max Pyziur wrote:
> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
It's a packaging trick, those files are marked
%ghost %config
-- rex
___
CentOS mailing lis
On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
>>> that's probably not the real solution. So when you established that
>>> your network and DNS was working, Gnome was wor
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
that's probably not the real solution. So when you estab
Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> On 3/28/2013 10:13 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin
>> wrote:
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin
>>> wrote:
> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
> that's probably not the re
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
>
> Finally, I've seen so many issues over the years, that at home, I run at
> runlevel 3, and have startx in my .bashrc. Doing it that way, if you have
> problems, when you hit , you're back at your command
> line, and you can look to see what was wrong wi
On 3/28/2013 3:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>> On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin
wrote:
>> Things never work very well for me before having
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> Thought it was not a good idea to use yum remove but had to
> try. In my head I could see you asking me to try it and I should have
> TRIED something, not just sit here. Well, hopefully I can put those
> packages back as you sai
I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what
about two PCI
video cards? The system seems to recognize them as shown by the lspci -v
output below, but
I can't get Xorg
On 03/28/2013 05:08 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what
about two PCI
video cards? The system seems to recognize them as shown by
On 3/28/2013 3:08 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> I know that you
> can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time,
actually with newer systems, the hardware does allow you to use builtin
and pci-express video concurrently. I had 3 monitors briefly on my
home (MS Windows 8)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.
> I know that you
> can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what
> about two PCI
> video cards? The system seems to recogniz
36 matches
Mail list logo
