On 03/26/2013 01:33 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to set up a redundant DRBD system but I'm running into
> trouble when I try to define a volume group. The physical backing device
> for the drbd resource /dev/drbd0 is /dev/vdb1. The problem is that when
> I do a "pvs" on the c
Greetings,
The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps
flashing - [Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
>
> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps
> flashing - [Folder vu
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:56 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
> > files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
> >
> > Also, how did you get rid of the annoyi
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
>> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
>>
>> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying a
Given the apparent addiction fail2ban keeps finding to the existing
logfile - not looking at the *new* one once logrotate runs - I was putting
a hack into place in /etc/logrotate.d/syslog. Nothing I find is perfectly
clear: I want to restart fail2ban *after* the logs are rotated. Do I put
the /sbin
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
> >> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> Yes, I ran that immediately after getting dropped to the shell. I can
> take a look at the device nodes tomorrow, but if I remember correctly,
> /dev/mapper contained only the file "control" before running vgchange
> -ay, that is, there was
I am presently configuring a test Asterisk 11 server based on CentOS-6
and I need to employ a softphone for testing. The base repo has
ekiga. The EPEL repo has twinkle. I lack the knowledge of whether
other packages exist or might be better suited. Which of the two do
you recommend? Or, alter
Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
>
> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps
> flashing - [Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Max Pyziur wrote:
>>
>> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
>> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
>>
>> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps
>> flas
On 26.03.2013 14:41, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am presently configuring a test Asterisk 11 server based on CentOS-6
> and I need to employ a softphone for testing. The base repo has
> ekiga. The EPEL repo has twinkle. I lack the knowledge of whether
> other packages exist or might be better suit
Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Max Pyziur wrote:
>>>
>>> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
>>> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
>>>
>>> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a
Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
replies in a few days. The thread is in software support for centos 6
and the subject of the thread is Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install.
Have had limited success in getting a login screen but once I logout, I
can't get back
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
> Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
> replies in a few days. The thread is in software support for centos 6
> and the subject of the thread is Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install.
> Have had limited success
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Max Pyziur wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> I *really* think you ought to ask in those repos, or alpine's mailing
>>> list. What's bothering me is it asserting that the "folder vulnerable",
>>> then saying that it
Robert Benjamin wrote:
> Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
> replies in a few days. The thread is in software support for centos 6
> and the subject of the thread is Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install.
> Have had limited success in getting a login screen but once
Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Max Pyziur wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
[...]
>>> I find the "users" list on fedoraproject challenging.
>>
>> Heh, heh. We can be touchy, here, too... but when someone comes in who's
>> actually read
Post URL for what? Sorry I don't understand.
On 3/26/2013 12:13 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
>> replies in a few days. The thread is in software support for centos 6
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/index.php?cat=9 Is this what you
want? Hope so.
On 3/26/2013 12:13 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
>> replies in a few days. The thread
On 3/26/2013 1:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
>> replies in a few days. The thread is in software support for centos 6
>> and the subject of the thread is Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install.
>> Have
On 03/26/2013 01:03 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
> On 3/26/2013 1:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>> Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
>>> replies in a few days. The thread is in software support for centos 6
>>> and the subject of the th
Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> On 3/26/2013 1:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>> Newbie here. Need help with a thread that has about 25 posts. No
>>> replies in a few days. The thread is in software support for centos 6
>>> and the subject of the thread is Centos 6.4 won
On 26 Mar 2013, at 22:13, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> As a friend said once, "yo mama dresses you funny, and you need a mouse to
> delete files"
Wow! Hardly a friendly introduction for a newbie to Linux. Attitudes like
this ensure users go scurrying back to Windows.
As my mother used to say, "
Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2013, at 22:13, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> As a friend said once, "yo mama dresses you funny, and you need a mouse
>> to delete files"
>
> Wow! Hardly a friendly introduction for a newbie to Linux. Attitudes
> like this ensure users go scurrying back to Windo
On 26 March 2013 18:58, wrote:
> Had you, for example, searched to find out a) how to look at a file, b)
> looked at the files I suggested you look at, or c) showed you'd done
> ANYTHING other than read my response and go, "duh, what's that mean?", I'd
> have been willing to work with you.
>
You
Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> On 26 March 2013 18:58, wrote:
>
>> Had you, for example, searched to find out a) how to look at a file, b)
>> looked at the files I suggested you look at, or c) showed you'd done
>> ANYTHING other than read my response and go, "duh, what's that mean?",
>> I'd have been
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:34 PM, wrote:
>>
> What, I *shouldn't* tell him what he's doing wrong? Just try to do his job
> for him, and let him come back, again and again, without ever actually
> learning something?
Well, yeah. Once he fixes his network so gnome works, why would he
keep coming b
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:34 PM, wrote:
>>>
>> What, I *shouldn't* tell him what he's doing wrong? Just try to do his
>> job for him, and let him come back, again and again, without ever actually
>> learning something?
>
> Well, yeah. Once he fixes his network so gnome work
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, wrote:
>
>>> What, I *shouldn't* tell him what he's doing wrong? Just try to do his
>>> job for him, and let him come back, again and again, without ever actually
>>> learning something?
>>
>> Well, yeah. Once he fixes his network so gnome works, why would he
>>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, wrote:
>>
What, I *shouldn't* tell him what he's doing wrong? Just try to do his
job for him, and let him come back, again and again, without ever
actually learning something?
>>>
>>> Well, yeah. Once he fixes his network so g
On 3/26/2013 3:14 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> On 26 March 2013 18:58, wrote:
>
>> Had you, for example, searched to find out a) how to look at a file, b)
>> looked at the files I suggested you look at, or c) showed you'd done
>> ANYTHING other than read my response and go, "duh, what's that m
I haven't actually renamed the root LVM volume, it's had the same name
since install. I just moved some drives around on the SATA ports. Is it
still worth recreating initrd?
--
Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal
joa...@terminalmx.com - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0
I'm having an occasional problem with a box. It's a Supermicro 16-core
Xeon, running CentOS 6.3 with kernel 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64, 96 gigs of
RAM, and an Areca 1882ix-24 RAID controller with 24 disks, 23 in RAID6
plus a hot spare. The RAID is divided into 3 partitions, two of 25 TB
plus one for
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:08 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> If he does. I mean, he kept complaining about the "black screen", and
>>> appeared to have no idea how to look at the files
>>
>> I know what you mean, of course. But it's sort of like telling
>> someone to learn latin before they can understan
On 03/26/2013 03:25 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
> On 3/26/2013 3:14 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
>> On 26 March 2013 18:58, wrote:
>>
>>> Had you, for example, searched to find out a) how to look at a file, b)
>>> looked at the files I suggested you look at, or c) showed you'd done
>>> ANYTHING ot
On 26 March 2013 21:29, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 03:25 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
> > On 3/26/2013 3:14 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> >> On 26 March 2013 18:58, wrote:
> >>
> >>> Had you, for example, searched to find out a) how to look at a file, b)
> >>> looked at the files I sug
On 03/26/2013 02:01 PM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> Anyone seen anything like this before? It's not very frequent, but it's
> very annoying.
I haven't, but the first thing I'd do in the situation you describe is
update the firmware on the RAID card.
I looked around at other discussions of the same e
On 03/26/2013 01:52 PM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> I haven't actually renamed the root LVM volume, it's had the same name
> since install. I just moved some drives around on the SATA ports. Is it
> still worth recreating initrd?
I wouldn't expect it to make a difference, but it probably wouldn't hurt
Ok, will try the firmware first. I saw some talk of the scheduler, but I
was uncertain if that applied in my case. By the way, doesn't the
command you include switch to the noop scheduler? Shouldn't it be "echo
deadline"?
--
Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal
joa...@t
Thanks, will try.
--
Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal
joa...@terminalmx.com - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0864
On 26/03/13 18:47, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 01:52 PM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>> I haven't actually renamed the root LVM volume, it's had the
On 03/26/2013 05:55 PM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
> Shouldn't it be "echo deadline"?
Yes! Copied and pasted the wrong line from docs. X(
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks, just checking. :)
--
Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal
joa...@terminalmx.com - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0864
On 26/03/13 19:13, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 05:55 PM, Joakim Ziegler wrote:
>> Shouldn't it be "echo deadline"?
>
> Yes! Copied and
On 26 Mar 2013, at 23:34, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> What, I *shouldn't* tell him what he's doing wrong? Just try to do his job
> for him, and let him come back, again and again, without ever actually
> learning something?
This is a list not personal email. Just ignore it if it upsets you and let
45 matches
Mail list logo
