Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

2013-03-25 Thread Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern)
Hello Svavar This was the first time that this problem occurred - with 60 Servers and about half a year of Centos 6 (5 before). But because the interfaces have a permanent load - really 24x7 - problems with power management would be a disaster. I will try to switch off. Thanks Hartmut > How of

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

2013-03-25 Thread Svavar Örn Eysteinsson
After you have tried the pcie_aspm boot option, also try : echo performance > /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy This will disable ASPM on PCIe and operate with maximum performance. This is what I use today on the DL380 G7. On 25.3.2013, at 09:06, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) wr

Re: [CentOS] maintaining patches across releases

2013-03-25 Thread James Pearson
Keith Keller wrote: > I was looking at this bug which my machines are currently experiencing: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905 > > The proposed patch is literally one new line in the XFS codebase. So > since the patch is so straightforward, I had a crazy idea that I would >

[CentOS] Bonded interfaces - testing

2013-03-25 Thread Dermot
Hi, I have 2 servers running CentOS 6.3. Each has four 1gb Ethernet ports. I have bonded all four ports on each server and patched them to the same switch (following the instructions at http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces). I have created aggregated trunks for the servers respec

Re: [CentOS] Bonded interfaces - testing

2013-03-25 Thread James Hogarth
> Does anyone have any thoughts? I pasted some details below increase they > have a bearing. > Remember that LACP (802.3ad) uses a hash algorithm (configurable on how it's carried out and whether you use mac addresses, dst/src IPs and ports will vary quite often for optimisation) to pick a physic

Re: [CentOS] Bonded interfaces - testing

2013-03-25 Thread Dermot
In which case, an appropriate test would be to have several servers push data to one the server while it's interface is un-bonded. We'd anticipate that the results would be under 1000Mbps. Then do the same with the bonded interface and the results would hopefully be more consistently around 1000Mpb

[CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread m . roth
Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4? Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found. With a lot of work, I, my manager, and the other admin, found that setting options edns0 in /etc/resolv.

Re: [CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4? > > Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access > nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found. > > With a lot of work, I, my manager, and the other admin, found that set

[CentOS] [Partially Solved] -Re: PHP Questions on move from CentOS 5.x to CentOS 6.x

2013-03-25 Thread Max Pyziur
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/24/2013 10:45 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: [...] >> Apache's log files show a 503 (for postgresql) and 500 (for mysql) errors >> >> I'm troubleshooting this through obvious channels (looking at logfiles, >> searching google, sdiff'ing configuration fi

Re: [CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread Cliff Pratt
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:26 AM, wrote: > Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4? > > Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access > nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found. > > With a lot of work, I, my manager, and the other adm

Re: [CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread Gary Greene
On Tuesday, Cliff Pratt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:26 AM, wrote: >> Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4? >> >> Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access >> nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found. >> >> With a lot of

Re: [CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread Stephen Harris
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:06:31PM +, Gary Greene wrote: > NSCD is also necessary if you're running an LDAP or NIS environment, Not necessary in a NIS environment on a LAN 'cos NIS is UDP based and very very fast to respond. LDAP, however, pretty much needs nscd (or sssd) in order to be halfw

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-03-25 Thread Joakim Ziegler
On 24/03/13 4:01, Nux! wrote: > On 24.03.2013 02:27, Joakim Ziegler wrote: >> I have a recently installed Mellanox VPI interface in my server. This >> is >> an InfiniBand interface, which, through the use of adapters, can also >> do >> 10GbE over fiber. I have one of the adapter's two ports configu

Re: [CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 03/25/2013 10:26 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Just now, over lunch, it failed... until I restarted nscd. My manager > tells me it's caching... but it seems to be caching momentary failures. That could be coincidence. As far as I know, Firefox will not use nscd for hostname lookups. I confir

Re: [CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 03/25/2013 04:06 PM, Gary Greene wrote: > NSCD is also necessary if you're running an LDAP or NIS environment, > so don't just turn it off if you're using external authentication > services. In a Winbind environment, NSCD is unnecessary however. I would advise all users to migrate to sssd from

[CentOS] LVM filters not working?

2013-03-25 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
Hi, I'm trying to set up a redundant DRBD system but I'm running into trouble when I try to define a volume group. The physical backing device for the drbd resource /dev/drbd0 is /dev/vdb1. The problem is that when I do a "pvs" on the command line the physical volume is shown as /dev/vdb1. So I

Re: [CentOS] "Can't find root device" with lvm root after moving drive on CentOS 6.3

2013-03-25 Thread Joakim Ziegler
Hi, Gordon, this was indeed a very good idea. I'm attaching that file here, as it's a bit large. Thanks in advance for help and ideas. -- Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal joa...@terminalmx.com - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0864 On 25/03/13 0:21, Gordon Messmer wr

Re: [CentOS] "Can't find root device" with lvm root after moving drive on CentOS 6.3

2013-03-25 Thread Joakim Ziegler
On 25/03/13 19:26, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > Hi, Gordon, this was indeed a very good idea. I'm attaching that file > here, as it's a bit large. Thanks in advance for help and ideas. Hm, it seems the list strips attachments, and just pasting it makes the mail too big to go through, so, pastebin to t

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-03-25 Thread Earl Ramirez
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 18:09 -0600, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > On 24/03/13 4:01, Nux! wrote: > > On 24.03.2013 02:27, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > >> I have a recently installed Mellanox VPI interface in my server. This > >> is > >> an InfiniBand interface, which, through the use of adapters, can also > >>

Re: [CentOS] nscd

2013-03-25 Thread Cliff Pratt
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Gary Greene wrote: > On Tuesday, Cliff Pratt wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:26 AM, wrote: >>> Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4? >>> >>> Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access >>> nytimes.co

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-03-25 Thread Eero Volotinen
> Mar 25 11:38:09 resolve02 kernel: mlx4_en: eth2: Link Up > Mar 25 11:38:09 resolve02 NetworkManager[4429]: (eth2): carrier > now ON (device state 2) > Mar 25 11:38:09 resolve02 NetworkManager[4429]: (eth2): device > state change: 2 -> 3 (reason 40) Is the network manager REALLY disabled on tha

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-03-25 Thread Joakim Ziegler
Well, /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth2 looks like this: DEVICE=eth2 BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT=yes NETWORK=10.10.0.0 NETMASK=255.255.0.0 IPADDR=10.10.0.1 USERCTL=no MTU=9000 HOTPLUG=yes NM_MANAGED=no -- Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal joa...@terminalmx.com -

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-03-25 Thread Eero Volotinen
2013/3/26 Joakim Ziegler : > Well, /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth2 looks like this: > > DEVICE=eth2 > BOOTPROTO=none > ONBOOT=yes > NETWORK=10.10.0.0 > NETMASK=255.255.0.0 > IPADDR=10.10.0.1 > USERCTL=no > MTU=9000 > HOTPLUG=yes > NM_MANAGED=no try changing BOOTPROTO=static, instead of n

Re: [CentOS] How to make a network interface come up automatically on link up?

2013-03-25 Thread Eero Volotinen
2013/3/26 Eero Volotinen : > 2013/3/26 Joakim Ziegler : >> Well, /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth2 looks like this: >> >> DEVICE=eth2 >> BOOTPROTO=none >> ONBOOT=yes >> NETWORK=10.10.0.0 >> NETMASK=255.255.0.0 >> IPADDR=10.10.0.1 >> USERCTL=no >> MTU=9000 >> HOTPLUG=yes >> NM_MANAGED=no > >

Re: [CentOS] "Can't find root device" with lvm root after moving drive on CentOS 6.3

2013-03-25 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 03/25/2013 06:35 PM, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > That's the output of, like you suggested: And you ran that before you ran "vgchange -a y"? That doesn't make any sense. The commands show the volume group active. I can't see any reason why the system wouldn't boot. I hate for you to keep reboo

Re: [CentOS] "Can't find root device" with lvm root after moving drive on CentOS 6.3

2013-03-25 Thread Joakim Ziegler
Yes, I ran that immediately after getting dropped to the shell. I can take a look at the device nodes tomorrow, but if I remember correctly, /dev/mapper contained only the file "control" before running vgchange -ay, that is, there was no "vg_resolve02-lv_root" device there. That device only sho