> I rmeember you can just exist the shell and log on again to apply the
> changes. Not really a reboot.
>
> You can check it with ulimit -a for the list items of the changes.
Yes logout and login again helps - but only your shell environment.
Every process/daemon/database has its own (unchanged) e
Dear All
I had successfully installed posfixadmin. I was able to login to postfix
admin and create email ids etc.
In something broken (not sure which one caused the issue), I am
experiencing below problem with postfix admin.
1. I am able to access domain/mailadmin page.
2. I can create admin acco
Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
# ifconfig em2
em2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 78:2B:CB:67:3E:5C
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
Maybe you will like ethtool from now.
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com
On 3/21/2013 5:21 PM, isdtor wrote:
> Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
> without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
>
> # ifconfig em2
> em2 Lin
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
currently using).
Is it fine to upgrade to CentOS 6 rpms while I'm on CentOS 5?
Without going to 5.9 you will have unpatched vulnerabilities. With all the
applicable patches for EL5 you should not have any vulnerabilities due to
in-channel software from CentOS. That does not mean the vulnerability scanner
won't find false positives, the key is to get the CVE number of the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 05:23:50PM +0530, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
> I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
> high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
> CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
> currently usi
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
> high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
> CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
> currently usi
2013/3/21 Anumeha Prasad :
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
> high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
> CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
> currently using).
Result of Nessus/Openva
2013/3/21 Ron Colvin :
> Without going to 5.9 you will have unpatched vulnerabilities. With all the
> applicable patches for EL5 you should not have any vulnerabilities due to
> in-channel software from CentOS. That does not mean the vulnerability scanner
> won't find false positives, the key is
On 21/3/2013 11:06 πμ, Austin Einter wrote:
> My question is why it is redirecting wrongly to domain/login.php.
>
>
I would suggest you visit postfixadmin project forum and/or subscribe to
their mailing list.
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
It sounds like a php coding problem. You can check the php page first.
Check at what condition is you will be redirected back to the login
page. It would be easy. You can send in the php file or give us the
address where to find the file.
Make sure you have all the conditions match, you will no
OK, some more information:
I rebooted to a non-xen kernel (2.6.18-348.1.1.el5), and the problem
remains, so it is not xen or a xen kernel issue. The machine has an AMD
64-bit processor (AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300), if that makes any
difference. I have a LD450 keyboard (DEC VT220 flavored
Dear Banyan
Thanks for input. I checked the log. I found always ssl_error_log is being
written when I am trying to login to postfixadmin and it looks relevant
also. But I do not know how to fix it.
The error log is as below.
[Thu Mar 21 07:08:09 2013] [error] [client 122.178.239.178] PHP Warnin
I just looked at link
http://sourceforge.net/p/postfixadmin/discussion/676076/thread/9eb8a948 ,
it looks a similar issue and it is related session cookie. I checked in my
php.ini and cooki is enabled. Not sure if memcache will create any
problem..,
Hope somebody would have faced this issue previou
Am 21.03.2013 um 13:12 schrieb John R. Dennison :
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 05:23:50PM +0530, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
>> I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
>> high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
>> CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm avail
On 03/21/2013 06:53 AM, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
> high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
> CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
> currently using).
>
> I
On 2013-03-21, Austin Einter wrote:
>
> In something broken (not sure which one caused the issue), I am
> experiencing below problem with postfix admin.
As another poster already commented, unless postfixadmin is part of an
official CentOS repo (and I strongly suspect it is not) you should
instea
Austin Einter wrote:
> Dear Banyan
> Thanks for input. I checked the log. I found always ssl_error_log is being
> written when I am trying to login to postfixadmin and it looks relevant
> also. But I do not know how to fix it.
>
> The error log is as below.
>
> [Thu Mar 21 07:08:09 2013] [error] [c
Hi guys,
my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS
6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2.
The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if
I turn the network interface down on one node to simulate a crash (for
example on the nod
A few weeks ago, suddenly, reading news at lunch, I could not get to
nytimes.com. I could ping it, and nslookup it, and if I put the IP address
in place of the name, it was fine.
After *much* back and forth over a ticket I put in, over the last week or
so, our group figured it out: It *seemed* to
On 3/21/2013 5:12 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> Most "penetration testing" is done via lackadaisical auditors using
> automated tools that are pretty much completely worthless in the real
> world using Enterprise Linux as said tools are unaware of backporting
> policies.
indeed, they are automated
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> A few weeks ago, suddenly, reading news at lunch, I could not get to
> nytimes.com. I could ping it, and nslookup it, and if I put the IP address
> in place of the name, it was fine.
>
> After *much* back and forth over a ticket I put in, over the last week or
> so, our gr
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> A few weeks ago, suddenly, reading news at lunch, I could not get to
>> nytimes.com. I could ping it, and nslookup it, and if I put the IP
>> address in place of the name, it was fine.
>>
>> After *much* back and forth over a ticket I put in, ove
This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
desktop (and no, I don't have the option of changing that at this time).
The desk
Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
> This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
> things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
> instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
> desktop (and no, I don't have the option of cha
On 2013/03/21 11:18, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
>> This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
>> things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
>> instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
On 03/21/2013 04:06 PM, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
> This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
> things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
> instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
> desktop (and no, I d
Hi All,
Not sure I understand the error message:
yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: less.cogeco.net
* elrepo: elrepo.org
* extras: centos.mirror.rafal.ca
* rpmforge: mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca
* updates:
I am trying to install a CentOS 6.4 x86_64 VM using a CentOS 5.9 x86_64
host, but its install has froze *twice*. What I am doing is to create a
10gig LVM volume, which I put a MS-DOS partition table on (using fdisk).
I then format the only partition to ext3, install grub and install the
pxeboot ker
On 3/21/2013 3:34 PM, Phil Savoie wrote:
> Error: Package: gnome-vfs2-ntfs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
> Requires: ntfsprogs = 1.13.1-1.el6.rf
> Removing: ntfsprogs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
> ntfsprogs = 1.13.1-1.el6.rf
> Obso
On 3/21/2013 3:42 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> Is it because some package from the second disk is needed? Do I have to
> create a merged version of the DVDs? Or is something else wrong?
I put a mirror of this, http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6/os/x86_64/
on a local http server
then I use the
Hi
Please help me understand to choose between the two versions CentOS 6.3 and
CentOS 6.4. I am not sure to choose 6.4 since it is being released
recently(
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-March/019276.html)
and it may be risky to push it in Live environment.
Regards,
Kaush
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed CentOS 6.4 on Dell Server R320 64bit with UEFI BIOS. Do i
> need both /boot and /boot/efi partitions. Please help me understand the
> difference between these.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kaushal
>
Hi,
checking in again rega
On 2013-03-22, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>
> Please help me understand to choose between the two versions CentOS 6.3 and
> CentOS 6.4. I am not sure to choose 6.4 since it is being released
> recently(
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-March/019276.html)
> and it may be risky t
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:04 PM, SilverTip257
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Dave Johansen
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:14 AM, SilverTip257
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 03/07/2013 06:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
The graphics chip is probably relevant. FWIW I can't Ctrl-Alt-Fn to
any Virtual Console (I just get a black screen, no login prompt). I
have a nVidia graphics chip. There are many reports on the Internet of
trouble with VC and nVidia and some other graphics chips.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Fri, Mar 22, 2
>On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
> On 2013-03-22, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>>
>> Please help me understand to choose between the two versions CentOS 6.3 and
>> CentOS 6.4. I am not sure to choose 6.4 since it is being released
>> recently(
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail
38 matches
Mail list logo
