Hi All.
TCP port 873 (rsync) is closed on download.linux.hp.com for ~24 hours.
Does anyone know why? A quick look in google has not helped to find
the answer.
Best regards,
Rafal.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
On 2/26/2013 12:55 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> TCP port 873 (rsync) is closed on download.linux.hp.com for ~24 hours.
> Does anyone know why? A quick look in google has not helped to find
> the answer.
I stopped using rsync for maintaining my own mirrors a few years ago due
to similar sorts of iss
>>
>
> motion. It's in the std. repos. We use it constantly. Got it configured to
> send out emails with pointers to the video of moving pictures.
many thanks - will check it out
also found zoneminder which looks interesting
Any ideas on which cameras offer the best value in terms of quality v
Yes I would suggest zoneminder for multiple IP camera recording.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom Brown wrote:
> >>
> >
> > motion. It's in the std. repos. We use it constantly. Got it configured
> to
> > send out emails with pointers to the video of moving pictures.
>
> many thanks - will
From: Tilman Schmidt
>> Tried Icinga's website download page...?
>
> Sure. Didn't see any RPMs there, just the tarball.
> But it seems Repoforge has it. Not the latest version (1.7.2
> while 1.8.4 is current) but I hope that'll do.
You missed the packages section:
https://www.icinga.org/downlo
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what does the word "Inline" mean in Inline with Upstream Stable as per
> http://iuscommunity.org/pages/FAQs.html#what-does-ius-stand-for?
>
>
IUS package releases match the release cycle of upstream software,
therefore they are "in
Hi,
dose anybody did a dovecot update from the original 1.0.7 to e.g. 1.1 or
1.2 from atrpms repository?
We dont have any special settings; Each user one mbox mailbox. About 500
imap/pop3 accounts, 400GB data.
Any suggestions and comments are welcome.
Regards . G. Reinicke
--
Götz Rei
Continuing to 'clean up' my new server by reviewing logged messages.
Researching a common one:
Feb 26 07:30:29 onlo named[19336]: error (unexpected RCODE SERVFAIL)
resolving 'foo.com/MX/IN': 1.2.3.4#53
I get the drift that my server has been directed to a 'lame server' and
logs that fact. Su
This was ment for the bind-users list. But if anyone has an answer, it
would be greatly welcomed. Afterall, this is from my bind app on my
Centos server.
Original Message
Subject:disabling lame server logging
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:35:44 -0500
From: Robert Mos
On 26/02/2013 13:31, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
dose anybody did a dovecot update from the original 1.0.7 to e.g. 1.1 or
1.2 from atrpms repository?
We dont have any special settings; Each user one mbox mailbox. About 500
imap/pop3 accounts, 400GB data.
Any suggestions and comme
Hi,
Am 26.02.13 14:40, schrieb Giles Coochey:
> On 26/02/2013 13:31, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> dose anybody did a dovecot update from the original 1.0.7 to e.g. 1.1 or
>> 1.2 from atrpms repository?
>>
>> We dont have any special settings; Each user one mbox mailbox. About
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:31:05PM +0100, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dose anybody did a dovecot update from the original 1.0.7 to e.g. 1.1 or
> 1.2 from atrpms repository?
>
> We dont have any special settings; Each user one mbox mailbox. About 500
> imap/pop3 accounts, 400GB
On 26/02/2013 13:47, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
Am 26.02.13 14:40, schrieb Giles Coochey:
On 26/02/2013 13:31, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
dose anybody did a dovecot update from the original 1.0.7 to e.g. 1.1 or
1.2 from atrpms repository?
We dont have any special
On 02/25/2013 04:24 PM, Gelen James wrote:
> 'rpm -V' can be misleading, if taking into account of prelink on
> Redhat/Centos Boxes which is running through cron by default. I've shown the
> steps on reverse the effect of prelink at the comments sections at link
> https://isc.sans.edu/diary/SSHD
On Mon, February 25, 2013 09:03, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 02:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I
>> am
>> looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I
>> don't
>> want automatic updates; I wa
It makes some sense to follow RHEL's suit, but Gelen's suggestions gain more
points here too.
As end users we probably turn off the default prelink settings after
RHEL/Centos initial installation, it is not a rocket technology.
On 2/26/13 8:10 AM, "Johnny Hughes" wrote:
On 02/25/2013 04:24 P
On Monday 25 February 2013 14:24:28 Gelen James wrote:
> 'rpm -V' can be misleading, if taking into account of prelink on
> Redhat/Centos Boxes which is running through cron by default. I've shown
> the steps on reverse the effect of prelink at the comments sections at
> link https://isc.sans.edu/d
> > Will the VNC server allow remote logins as root?
> From root did you run vncpasswd to create the needed /root.vnc/ files?
Yes, I did. I see a /root/.vnc directory with a log, pid, passwd, and
xstartup
files.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredV
On 25.Feb.2013, at 23:24, Gelen James wrote:
> 'rpm -V' can be misleading, if taking into account of prelink on
> Redhat/Centos Boxes which is running through cron by default. I've shown the
> steps on reverse the effect of prelink at the comments sections at link
> https://isc.sans.edu/diary/S
Il 25/02/2013 12.28, Simon Matter ha scritto:
>> Hello to the list,
>> I update a RedHat server from 6.3 to 6.4 and install the last shorewall
>> rpm 4.5.13.0-1.el6, after this shorewall not start at boot and show the
>> error ERROR: Your kernel/iptables do not include state match support. No
>> v
On 02/26/2013 01:19 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>>> Will the VNC server allow remote logins as root?
>> From root did you run vncpasswd to create the needed /root.vnc/ files?
> Yes, I did. I see a /root/.vnc directory with a log, pid, passwd, and
> xstartup
> files.
>
> Any suggestions?
And your /
Robert:
> And your /etc/sysconfig/vncserver has something like;
> VNCSERVERS="1:foo 2:root"
> and you are attempting to connect to 5902 for the root user (compared to
> 5901 for user foo)?
Yes.
This is strange. I just ran vncpasswd as root again and I can connect
now. Weird, but I guess the p
On 02/26/2013 01:36 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Robert:
>
>> And your /etc/sysconfig/vncserver has something like;
>> VNCSERVERS="1:foo 2:root"
>> and you are attempting to connect to 5902 for the root user (compared to
>> 5901 for user foo)?
> Yes.
>
> This is strange. I just ran vncpasswd as roo
> Our's is not to reason why...
I love that quote! I guess you truncated it to be nice.
Thanks for your help!
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
_
So, I decided to install CentOS on a separate system in my local home
(business) network. I know the internal IP and the external IP for the
router. I will be working with a dynamic IP for a while, from our ISP,
provided by our cable company. It's almost always the same but it's not
static.
W
Bruce Whealton wrote:
> So, I decided to install CentOS on a separate system in my local home
> (business) network. I know the internal IP and the external IP for the
> router. I will be working with a dynamic IP for a while, from our ISP,
> provided by our cable company. It's almost always the
hey, I have an application for drbd replication between a pair of EL6
servers, and I just realized that drbd is no longer built in.
googling found me this blog on doing it using ElRepo distributions...
http://www.broexperts.com/2012/06/how-to-install-drbd-on-centos-6-2/
is that still best pract
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Bruce Whealton
wrote:
> So, I decided to install CentOS on a separate system in my local home
> (business) network. I know the internal IP and the external IP for the
> router. I will be working with a dynamic IP for a while, from our ISP,
> provided by our cable
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> hey, I have an application for drbd replication between a pair of EL6
> servers, and I just realized that drbd is no longer built in.
>
> googling found me this blog on doing it using ElRepo distributions...
> http://www.broexperts.com/2012/0
On a system I just built and installed fresh from base and update I am
getting warnings in httpd/error.log about
mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.6.2
mod_wsgi: Runtime using Python/2.6.6
Just a 'warning'. What to do?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> hey, I have an application for drbd replication between a pair of EL6
> servers, and I just realized that drbd is no longer built in.
>
> googling found me this blog on doing it using ElRepo distributions...
> http://www.broexperts.com/2012/0
On 2/26/2013 3:03 PM, Patrick Flaherty wrote:
> That being said, if you have a requirement that your backup solution
> is up five nines, then yeah, use drbd / pacemaker, it's just not a use
> case I see very often.
don't have anywhere near that sort of uptime requirements, but when data
starts sp
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:26 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> don't have anywhere near that sort of uptime requirements, but when data
> starts spiralling out into the multi-terabytes with billions of file
> links, rsync is painfully slow.
Yes, the one problem with backuppc is that the number of hard
On 2/26/2013 3:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That should work, but what happens if they ever get out of sync? How
> long will it take drbd to catch up with something that size?
the initial sync of the 8TB starting volumes is looking to be a 460 hour
affair. yeouch. I might have to rethink th
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
> the initial sync of the 8TB starting volumes is looking to be a 460 hour
> affair.
Something wrong here. That's only 5 MB/sec; I did an initial sync of a
10TB volume in less than a day (dual bonded gigabits, dedicated).
Steve
_
On 2/26/2013 4:17 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> >the initial sync of the 8TB starting volumes is looking to be a 460 hour
>> >affair.
> Something wrong here. That's only 5 MB/sec; I did an initial sync of a
> 10TB volume in less than a day (dual bonded g
On 2/25/2013 9:03 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 02:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
>> looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't
>> want automatic updates; I want to control when
On 2013-02-26, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> the use case is more like, if the primary backup server fails, I'd like
> to have the secondary backup server running within a few hours of
> futzing with the existing backups available for recovery.
If you're doing something rsync-like, and if your buil
Dne 25.2.2013 14:48, Robert Moskowitz napsal(a):
> I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
> looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't
> want automatic updates; I want to control when and what gets updated.
>
> First I have to determine
>
> I also haven't investigated yet if drbd devices can be 'grown' ... pause
> replication, lvextend slave and master, xfs_grow the master, and resume
> replication? or is that too easy and it won't work...
>
They can be grown (I used it for static image store on the Sky
Entertainment websites
40 matches
Mail list logo
