> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 8:39 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] Dell Precision M6700 with centos 5?
>
> any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 insta
>> any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install? machine is rhel 6.1
>> certified laptop?
>
> Why not install CentOS 6.3 instead? CentOS and RHEL are binary compatible.
Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install? machine is rhel 6.1
>>> >>certified laptop?
>> >
>> >Why not install CentOS 6.3 instead? CentOS and RHEL are binary compatible.
> Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
your project uses a laptop a
> your project uses a laptop as the target ?
yes, its best solution for mobility.
>
> why would any new project require an OS thats approaching end of service
> life ?
project is new, but software is old, so it only supports rhel 5/centos
5 without code modifications.
--
Eero
__
2013/2/22 Eero Volotinen :
>> your project uses a laptop as the target ?
>
> yes, its best solution for mobility.
>
>>
>> why would any new project require an OS thats approaching end of service
>> life ?
>
> project is new, but software is old, so it only supports rhel 5/centos
> 5 without code mo
On 21 February 2013 22:31, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have pretty much gotten use to Gnome 3 on my F17 notebooks. With the
> right extensions it actually kind of works.
That can be said for Windows as well. Why use something that's broken
to start with?
--
Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi
Hi all,
This morning, my centos NFS server returns these error messages:
RPC: fragment too large: 0x00800103
RPC: multiple fragments per record not supported
RPC: fragment too large: 0x00800103
RPC: multiple fragments per record not supported
RPC: fragment too large: 0x00800103
RPC: multiple fra
On 22/02/13 08:26, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install? machine is rhel 6.1
>> certified laptop?
Why not install CentOS 6.3 instead? CentOS and RHEL are binary compatible.
>> Yes, but Centos 5 is needed
Am 22.02.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Ned Slider :
> On 22/02/13 08:26, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
>>
>> your project uses a laptop as the target ?
>>
>> why would any new project require an OS thats approaching e
On 02/22/2013 04:23 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 21 February 2013 22:31, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I have pretty much gotten use to Gnome 3 on my F17 notebooks. With the
>> right extensions it actually kind of works.
> That can be said for Windows as well. Why use something that's broken
> to
On 22/02/13 12:51, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 22.02.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Ned Slider :
>> On 22/02/13 08:26, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
>>>
>>> your project uses a laptop as the target ?
>>>
>>> why would any
On 02/21/2013 09:45 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
>>> (no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
>>> Fed
On 17.02.2013 г. 17:59 ч., Florian La Roche wrote:
>> I could have written a script to remove IPV6 link local address but
>> there should be a basic option for that.
>
> You can set: echo "options ipv6 disable=1" > /etc/modprobe.d/noipv6.conf
>
> But more and more apps then log problems or get conf
On 02/21/2013 06:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/21/2013 3:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> :Hardware name: HP Compaq dc7800 Small Form Factor
>>> ...
> Should I worry?
>>> yes.
>>>
>>> You should update bios .
> hmmm, thats a 2007 vintage economy business desktop ?
>
> looks to be a Dece
On 2/22/2013 12:32 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> other solution might be installing centos 6 and virtualizing centos 5 on it.
thats what I likely would do, assuming this app really doesn't work on
C6 with a bit of tweaking (installing the -compat libraries etc).
that and start looking immediately
On 2/21/2013 12:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> :[Firmware Warn]: Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
> returns all ones!
I googled "Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones!" and got some related results.
this bug report (on FC12) says... "yes
On 02/22/2013 01:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/21/2013 12:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> :[Firmware Warn]: Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
>> returns all ones!
> I googled "Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
> returns all ones!" and got some relat
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2013 01:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 2/21/2013 12:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> :[Firmware Warn]: Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address
>>> fed9
>>> returns all ones!
>> I googled "Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
>> r
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> This issue is not CentOS specific ... here is another discussion:
>
> http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1235797
>
> The issue seems to be that someone with local access elevates their
> privileges in some manner, and after they
> But don't forget that what the kernel people call 'local' access
> really means any bug in any network application that lets you execute
> an arbitrary command even if it is non-root - and those have
> historically been pretty common.
sounds like local install of famous php scripting language...
On 02/22/2013 02:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 22.02.2013 20:28, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>>> on a similar/identical bug with Fedora FC17, someone suggested booting
>>> with iommu=off to work around this.
>> Where do I add this?
> like every other kernel param in /boot/grub/grub.conf at
> th
On 02/22/2013 03:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 22.02.2013 20:58, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> Kernel param. I really should have caught that.
>>
>> So I was all ready to edit grub.conf and then slapped my hand.
>> You TEST it out first, adding the command at boot time. ARGH!
> one option
>
On 02/22/2013 01:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> This issue is not CentOS specific ... here is another discussion:
>>
>> http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1235797
>>
>> The issue seems to be that someone with local access elevates
Am 22.02.2013 um 21:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
> On 02/22/2013 01:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> This issue is not CentOS specific ... here is another discussion:
>>>
>>> http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1235797
>>>
>>> The i
Trying to install Centos6 on my system (it's been running C5 for years).
I've got a pair of drives, so I'm trying to use RAID-1.
Previously I used a procedure where each partition was part of a separate
RAID device, but this time I'm trying the HOWTO from the Centos WIKI on
making a partitionable
On 02/22/2013 09:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> i use following script to scan top level
> directories for files that are not packaged:
>
If you trust your rpm-db, then something like my syscleanup script might
also come in handy :
https://www.gitorious.org/syscleanup/syscleanup/trees/master
I
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Fred wrote:
> Previously I used a procedure where each partition was part of a separate
> RAID device, but this time I'm trying the HOWTO from the Centos WIKI on
> making a partitionable RAID pair.
Although the instructions work, there are pitfalls when one of t
27 matches
Mail list logo
