> I would assume (and I know it's not good to do that!) that the updates
> and patches that are pushed out through the repos are something not to
> be ingored,so why would the severity of one be that big an
> issue?(and I'm just curious...not trying to start a war!..LoL!)
>
For a start the
>
> I am a new user of CentOS, I have installed "CentOS-5.8-i386" as a virtual
> machine on VMware Workstation 9.0 for learning purposes.
As a side issue if you are installing for learning purposes use CentOS 6
instead...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@c
Do you use Parallels Plesk? Did you update?
Seems to be related ...
http://download1.parallels.com/Plesk/PP10/10.4/release-notes/parallels-plesk-panel-10.4-for-linux-
based-os.html - see bug 85
I told them to reopen it, since I am getting those mails too since 3 days
_
I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
When run from a terminal it prints:
no suitable windowing system found, exiting.
Is this yet another case of apps moving on beyond compatibility with
the ol
On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
> I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
> previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
> When run from a terminal it prints:
>
> no suitable windowing system found, exiting.
>
> Is this yet another cas
On 02/10/2013 03:37 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> I would assume (and I know it's not good to do that!) that the updates
>> and patches that are pushed out through the repos are something not to
>> be ingored,so why would the severity of one be that big an
>> issue?(and I'm just curious...not
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.02.2013 15:11, schrieb fred smith:
> > I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
> > previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
> > When run from a terminal it prints
On 02/10/2013 12:34 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 10.02.2013 15:11, schrieb fred smith:
>>> I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
>>> previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start u
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:11:00PM +, Nux! wrote:
> On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
> > I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
> > previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
> > When run from a terminal it prints:
> >
> > no suit
Στις 25-01-2013 20:22, SilverTip257 έγραψε:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
> denni...@conversis.de> wrote:
>
>> On 01/25/2013 05:09 PM, Gene Poole wrote:
>> > OK, What's the best CentOS platform for KVM? CentOS 5 or CentOS
>> 6?
>>
>> At this time you should only ins
>
> While I agree that CentOS6 is the new and better OS I should say that
> it has several serious problems (bugs) that have been bugging us for
> several
> months to the point the we began considering going backwards to 5 which
> was solid
> as rock from day 1. Apparently these bugs (related to
Στις 10-02-2013 23:08, Rainer Duffner έγραψε:
>>
>> While I agree that CentOS6 is the new and better OS I should say
>> that
>> it has several serious problems (bugs) that have been bugging us for
>> several
>> months to the point the we began considering going backwards to 5
>> which
>> was soli
On 02/03/2013 04:38 AM, Grzegorz Sołtys wrote:
> I have a virtualized Server with only one physical interface eth0 (WAN).
> To run OpenVPN i need to use DHCP server.
I don't think you do. OpenVPN can allocate addresses without ISC DHCP,
typically.
> And here is the question: is
> there a chance
On 02/03/2013 06:06 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> I would like to limit the bandwidth available to a guest. I tried using
> the tc command, but it is only limiting the download speed to the
> guest.
TC is fairly complex, and only really effectively limits speed sent. If
you want to limit the uploa
On 04.02.2013 02:06, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am using a CentOS server as a KVM host using bridged networking
> for the guest servers.
>
> I would like to limit the bandwidth available to a guest. I tried
> using
> the tc command, but it is only limiting the download speed to the
> g
2013/1/25 Gene Poole :
> OK, What's the best CentOS platform for KVM? CentOS 5 or CentOS 6?
C6
--
Eero, RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/08/2013 11:09 AM, Ed Morrison wrote:
> For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my
> centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will
> not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig
> using itself as the resolver the queries f
On 02/08/2013 07:39 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> Do you have any tips on how to reach vlan 5 on the virt host from vlan 1?
Not without the configuration from your switch.
The most likely problem is this: Your workstation is sending traffic to
192.168.5.10. The switch sends it through VLAN 5 to et
On 02/09/2013 07:01 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> Check the following line in /etc/named.conf and make sure you have both
> ip addresses:
I'm sorry. I thought you were running BIND. I'm on that list too...got
to pay more attention next time!
Anyway, check the bind (no pun intended!) address doing
I'm getting a strange error pop up on my box:
#
No more mirrors are available
Required data could not be found on any of the configured software sources.
There were no more download mirrors that could be tried.
More details
failure: repodata/filelists.sqlite.bz2 from
On 10.02.2013 23:32, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I'm getting a strange error pop up on my box:
>
> #
> No more mirrors are available
>
> Required data could not be found on any of the configured software
> sources.
> There were no more download mirrors that could be tried.
On 02/10/2013 07:20 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 10.02.2013 23:32, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> I'm getting a strange error pop up on my box:
>>
>> #
>> No more mirrors are available
>>
>> Required data could not be found on any of the configured software
>> sources.
>> There were no
Hello all,
I have run into a sticky problem with a failed device in an md array,
and I asked about it on the linux raid mailing list, but since the
problem may not be md-specific, I am hoping to find some insight here.
(If you are on the MD list, and are seeing this twice, I humbly
apologize.)
Th
Hi Keith,
It seems that the mdadm -D indicates the root cause of "device busy":
>5 8 96 5 faulty spare rebuilding /dev/sdg
Is there any clue in /proc/mdstat and /var/log/messages?
On 02/11/2013 12:39 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have run into a sticky problem with a failed device
Hi Vincent,
On 2013-02-11, Vincent Li wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> It seems that the mdadm -D indicates the root cause of "device busy":
>
> >5 8 96 5 faulty spare rebuilding /dev/sdg
Well, this is one thing I don't quite get. In the past, when a device
has been marked faulty (even on this array), md
> Are there by chance bugzilla entries for those?
> Just out of curiosity - NFSV4 is an area of interest to us, in the future.
Have you checked the newest kernel from the last few days? It has a few nfs
fixes included:
$ rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64 | head -100 | egrep
'(
26 matches
Mail list logo
