> > Serving multiple ssl certificates requires SNI on server and also
> > client support.
> >
> >
http://www.rackspace.com/knowledge_center/article/serving-secure-sites-with-sni-on-apache
>
> this works on Centos 6 without messing up openssl libraries :)
Take a look at this freeIPA how to I wrote
> Hello:
>
> I am using a CentOS server as a KVM host using bridged networking
> for the guest servers.
>
> I would like to limit the bandwidth available to a guest. I tried using
> the tc command, but it is only limiting the download speed to the
> guest.
>
> Is there a way to limit the upload sp
Hi,
I tried to install CentOS 4.1(x86_64) on my virtual machine.
I am getting kernel panic error. Installation program crashed.
I also tried CentOS 4.0 and CentOS 4.2, got same error.
There is no problem with installing CentOS 4.1(32 bits).
Can you help me regarding this?
What is the more st
rajaranjan wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to install CentOS 4.1(x86_64) on my virtual machine.
> I am getting kernel panic error. Installation program crashed.
> I also tried CentOS 4.0 and CentOS 4.2, got same error.
> There is no problem with installing CentOS 4.1(32 bits).
>
> Can you help me rega
Hello Yves,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:08:20 -0500 Yves Bellefeuille
wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2013, wwp wrote:
>
> > This point has already been answered on this mailing list (and
> > elsewhere). A bit of search in the archives and elsewhere would
> > quickly bring you this:
> > http://wiki.
Hello,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:23:42 +0100 wwp wrote:
[snip]
> For this Qt47, I downloaded the following RPMs:
> phonon-backend-gstreamer-4.7.2-1_18.el6.i686.rpm
> qt47-4.7.2-1_18.el6.i686.rpm
> qt47-config-4.7.2-1_18.el6.i686.rpm
> qt47-webkit-4.7.2-1_18.el6.i686.rpm
> qt47-x11-4.7.2-1_18.e
On 2/4/2013 1:17 AM, rajaranjan wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to install CentOS 4.1(x86_64) on my virtual machine.
> I am getting kernel panic error. Installation program crashed.
> I also tried CentOS 4.0 and CentOS 4.2, got same error.
> There is no problem with installing CentOS 4.1(32 bits).
>
From: Bent Terp
> I tried last week to do traffic shaping on a production system,
> object of the exercise was simply to throttle the outgoing traffic.
> tc qdisc add dev eth4 root tbf rate 300mbit burst 300kb latency 50ms
> But the server became rather instable, crashing repeatedly without
> any
On 02/03/2013 08:11 AM, Grzegorz Sołtys wrote:
> So, if my WAN IP adress is 83.238.*.* then i need to run DHCP server
> in the same class of if address. But, if got only this address and i
> will setup in eg: 83.238.55.10 to 15 range for eth0:0 and there is a
> machine with WAN address like 83.238.
On 2/3/2013 2:38 PM, Grzegorz Sołtys wrote:
>
> Hello All
>
> I have looking for any specific answer for one thing.
>
> I have a virtualized Server with only one physical interface eth0 (WAN).
> To run OpenVPN i need to use DHCP server. And here is the question: is
> there a chance to run DHCP serv
On 2/3/2013 11:47 PM, Bent Terp wrote:
> So my advice is to use a wildcard domain covering *.mycompany.com - but
> remember that mycompany.com does not match *.mycompany.com, so you'll need a
> redirect to
> www.mycompany.com BR Bent PS Just realised that we did this on nginx not
> apache,
On 4 February 2013 14:20, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> On 2/3/2013 11:47 PM, Bent Terp wrote:
> > So my advice is to use a wildcard domain covering *.mycompany.com - but
> remember that mycompany.com does not match *.mycompany.com, so you'll
> need a redirect to
> > www.mycompany.com BR Bent PS
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:12 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> If you need bonding or vlans it becomes more complicated ;-)
LOL. We have been testing this (bonding *and* vlans).
Once you understand how it works it makes sense, but you need to
understand it first and most people researching this are pro
Does anyone know of a repository that's *trustworthy* (gotta worry 'bout
malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it. Someone here was ready
to move to a newer version, and from the ruby.org website, they're
apparently actively hostile to all RH-
James:
> Is this c5 or c6?
This is CentOS 6.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972)834-1565, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/centos
Virtual private server with CentOS 6 preinstalled
Unmetered bandwidth = no overage charges
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
On 02/04/2013 03:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Does anyone know of a repository that's *trustworthy* (gotta worry 'bout
> malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
>
> OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it. Someone here was ready
> to move to a newer version, and from the ruby.
On Tue, January 29, 2013 17:37, lists-centos wrote:
>
> James -- Look at the MAILFROM bit in crontab(5).
>
>
> - Richard
>
That worked on CentOS-6 but does not on CentOS-5. I have rearranged
things to run the tests solely from CentOS-6 boxes and using MAILFROM
has circumvented the problem.
>
> LOL. We have been testing this (bonding *and* vlans).
>
> Once you understand how it works it makes sense, but you need to
> understand it first and most people researching this are probably used
> to the fantastic vmware tooling that keeps it all hidden.
>
>
>
One of the environments I built a
> I did some experimenting with and without the RAID card installed. There are
> no DMAR errors, when the RAID card isn't present... Too bad!
Just got this confirmed by Adaptec Support:
> VT-D is not supported with our Adaptec RAID Controllers. You will need to
> disable this in the BIOS of th
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 08:11 AM, Grzegorz Sołtys wrote:
>> So, if my WAN IP adress is 83.238.*.* then i need to run DHCP server
>> in the same class of if address. But, if got only this address and i
>> will setup in eg: 83.238.55.10 to 15 range for et
On 2/4/2013 7:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Does anyone know of a repository that's*trustworthy* (gotta worry 'bout
> malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
>
> OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it. Someone here was ready
> to move to a newer version, and from the ruby.org w
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/4/2013 7:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a repository that's*trustworthy* (gotta worry 'bout
>> malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
>>
>> OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it. Someone here was
>> ready to move to a newer vers
On Feb 4, 2013, at 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/4/2013 7:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a repository that's*trustworthy* (gotta worry 'bout
>> malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
>>
>> OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it. Someone here was
On 02/04/2013 07:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/4/2013 7:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a repository that's*trustworthy* (gotta worry 'bout
>> malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
>>
>> OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it. Someone here was ready
>
Craig White wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2013, at 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 2/4/2013 7:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Does anyone know of a repository that's*trustworthy* (gotta worry
>>> 'bout malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
>>>
>>> OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I lik
Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 07:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 2/4/2013 7:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Does anyone know of a repository that's*trustworthy* (gotta worry
>>> 'bout malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has?
>>>
>>> OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it.
On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> use RPM packages, Google 'enterprise ruby' and install it (it's Ruby
>> 1.8.7) It's not likely to get any more updates though. If you get off the
>
> Sorry, can't do that. As I believe I mentioned, they formerly required the
> 1.8.7 enterp
On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Phil Dobbin wrote:
>>
>> The doesn't scale well argument hasn't been the case for at least a few
>> years now. Twitter is just one example. Some of the busiest sites on teh
>> Interwebs are still using it.
>
> Um, according to wikipedia, twi
Craig White wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> use RPM packages, Google 'enterprise ruby' and install it (it's Ruby
>>> 1.8.7) It's not likely to get any more updates though. If you get off
>>> the
>>
>> Sorry, can't do that. As I believe I mentioned, they formerly
On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>>> Why is it that they don't package it?
>>
>> shouldn't you be asking this of upstream? They're the ones who choose
>> which versions to include.
>
> No. If I cared enough, I'd ask on the RUBY list. It's ruby.org tha
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
>
>> You, on the other hand, have already come here with the attitude of "my
>> way or the highway"; this is *NOT* the way to encourage folks to change
>> their minds.* Nor is it helpful to me.
>
> not really - it's that you don't have
On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Craig White wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You, on the other hand, have already come here with the attitude of "my
>>> way or the highway"; this is *NOT* the way to encourage folks to change
>>> their minds.* Nor is it hel
I am planning to increase the disk space on my desktop system. It is
running CentOS 5.9 w/XEN. I have two 160Gig 2.5" laptop (2.5") SATA drives
in two slots of a 4-slot hot swap bay configured like this:
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Uni
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
>
> And lastly, Ruby is an ecosystem far beyond the base language. It has a 'gem'
> package management system which again is cross platform and even when you try
> to package ruby in rpm's, there's no way an RH or EPEL will keep up with
> upd
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> I am planning to increase the disk space on my desktop system. It is
> running CentOS 5.9 w/XEN. I have two 160Gig 2.5" laptop (2.5") SATA drives
> in two slots of a 4-slot hot swap bay configured like this:
>
>
I would certainly suggest te
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 18:01 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Craig White wrote:
> >
> >
> > And lastly, Ruby is an ecosystem far beyond the base language. It has a
> > 'gem' package management system which again is cross platform and even when
> > you try to package r
Thanks for this discussion. I also had (and was about to
ask) similar question(s).
I've already tried to get/use Latest+Stable ruby compiled
& used on other RHEL based repo, but something conflicted,
as i'm new to these, so beyond my understanding what was
it at this point.
But need to look-into/tr
On 02/04/2013 11:36 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Craig White wrote:
>>>
>>>
You, on the other hand, have already come here with the attitude of "my
way or the highway"; this is *NOT* the way to enco
Maybe we should think about writing the kernel in java/python/ruby/php etc?
Wonder why this hasn't happened before?
--
-Original Message-
From: Phil Dobbin
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:30:59
To: CentOS mailing list
Reply-To: CentOS mailin
39 matches
Mail list logo
