-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Rudi Ahlers
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:52 AM
To: CentOS
Subject: [CentOS] 2way authentication for SSH?
Hi,
Does anyone know of a stable / working "2way authentication" system for
SSH,
On 01/31/2013 02:30 AM, John Hinton wrote:
> On 1/30/2013 5:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> On 01/30/2013 04:31 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I should probably find either the amavis or clam list(s) and take this
there?
>>>
Oh, I have not applie
On 01/29/2013 02:03 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for their replies.
Excellent discussion, Tim. Thanks for bringing this up and coming back with
such good arguments.
Some of the objections I've seen on this thread:
1. LiveUpgrade takes too much CPU and disk space. Not if your system
On 31/01/13 11:17, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 01/31/2013 02:30 AM, John Hinton wrote:
>> On 1/30/2013 5:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2013 04:31 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I should probably find either the amavis or clam list(s) and take thi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Bry8 Star wrote:
> When using multiple repo, then how would i know, an
> app/lib from non-CentOS (that is, 3rd party repo) is going
> to conflict or not with CentOS core, base, essential
> app/lib packages ?
>
I don't think there is any way to know that. And mor
On 01/31/2013 07:05 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 31/01/13 11:17, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> On 01/31/2013 02:30 AM, John Hinton wrote:
>>> On 1/30/2013 5:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/30/2013 04:31 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I should probably fin
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> As you have seen there are differences between the packages. This makes
>> the CentOS documentation worthless to you as you are not using the same
>> versions used in the documentation.
>
> I had hopes that the 'official' packaging would work well, particularly
> now th
On 01/31/2013 09:26 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> As you have seen there are differences between the packages. This makes
>>> the CentOS documentation worthless to you as you are not using the same
>>> versions used in the documentation.
>> I had hopes that the 'off
I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bug report. I could not
figure out how to do this, so I did a reinstall, but it did not replace
this file (whatprovides says it comes from this rpm).
Is there a way to extrac
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote on 31.01.2013 16:55:37:
> Robert Moskowitz
> Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
>
> 31.01.2013 16:55
>
> Bitte antworten an
> CentOS mailing list
>
> An
>
> CentOS mailing list
>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
>
> [CentOS] How to extract one file from rpm using y
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
> amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bug report. I could not
> figure out how to do this, so I did a reinstall, but it did not replace
> this file (whatprovides says it comes from this rp
On 01/31/2013 11:01 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
>> amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bug report. I could not
>> figure out how to do this, so I did a reinstall, but it did not replac
From: Robert Moskowitz
> I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
> amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bug report. I could not
> figure out how to do this, so I did a reinstall, but it did not replace
> this file (whatprovides says it comes from thi
On 01/31/2013 11:36 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Robert Moskowitz
>
>> I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
>> amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bug report. I could not
>> figure out how to do this, so I did a reinstall, but it did not replace
>> t
Hello listmates,
If I have a regular, ACL-capable filesystem on Linux (say, ext4 or xfs) is
there a way for me to establish the following:
1) There is a directory, say, /home/joe . It is owned by user joe . No one
but joe (and root, of course) can read or write anything in this directory.
2) No
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 01/31/2013 11:36 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Robert Moskowitz
>>
>>> I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
>>> amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bug report. I could not
>>> figure out how to do t
On 01/31/2013 11:05 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> On 01/31/2013 11:36 AM, John Doe wrote:
>>> From: Robert Moskowitz
>>>
I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bu
On 01/31/2013 11:40 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 31.01.2013 16:55, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
>> amavisd-new rpm to get the defaults to submit a bug report. I could not
>> figure out how to do this, so I did a reinstall,
On 01/31/2013 12:37 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 11:05 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/31/2013 11:36 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Robert Moskowitz
> I want to get the original version of /etc/clamd.d/amavis.conf from the
>
On Wednesday 30 January 2013, wwp wrote:
> I was running skype 4.1.0.20 on my 64-bit laptop for weeks (installed
> in /opt, from an official skype binary archive, plus few 32-bit stuff
> to get it working), when suddenly it stopped working, no way to start
> it:
How did you get Skype 4.1 to work
Hello,
In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport.
But yum update gives me:
Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates)
Requires: libreport >= 2.0.9-5.el6_3.2
Removing: libreport-2.0.9-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base)
libreport = 2.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport.
>
> But yum update gives me:
>
> Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates)
> Requires: libreport >= 2.0.9-5.el6_3.2
> Removing: libr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52:
> In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update
> gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates)
Confirmed. Same issue here.
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
23 matches
Mail list logo
