[CentOS] Ceph - best practices

2013-01-29 Thread Nux!
Hello, I'm looking into installing ceph, can anyone share his experiences and advices? What kernels you used and so on, installation repos, are there any selinux issues? Etc. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro __

Re: [CentOS] Not respected repo priorities...

2013-01-29 Thread John Doe
From: Johnny Hughes > On 01/28/2013 08:00 AM, John Doe wrote: >> ---> Package perl-Compress-Zlib.x86_64 0:2.020-127.el6 will be obsoleted >> ---> Package perl-IO-Compress.noarch 0:2.037-1.el6.rfx will be >> obsoleting >> --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Bzip2) = 2.037 for >> package:

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 95, Issue 10

2013-01-29 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Mail notification in panel/system tray on CentOS 6

2013-01-29 Thread Toralf Lund
On 28/01/13 14:18, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > >> On 27/01/13 07:13, SilverTip257 wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Giles Coochey >> wrote: On 25/01/2013 15:00, Toralf Lund wrote: > Hi. > > Does anyone know of a way

[CentOS] Is this a NFSv4 bug??

2013-01-29 Thread C. L. Martinez
HI all, I have configured a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 as a NFSv4 server and I am suffering errors like this: perl[7889]: segfault at a80 ip 7fb870227ea2 sp 7fff2fecda30 error 4 in libperl.so[7fb870193000+162000] The symptoms are the same as described in this thread: http://serverfault.com/que

Re: [CentOS] Is this a NFSv4 bug??

2013-01-29 Thread m . roth
C. L. Martinez wrote: > HI all, > > I have configured a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 as a NFSv4 server and I am > suffering errors like this: > > perl[7889]: segfault at a80 ip 7fb870227ea2 sp 7fff2fecda30 > error 4 in libperl.so[7fb870193000+162000] > > The symptoms are the same as described in thi

Re: [CentOS] Is this a NFSv4 bug??

2013-01-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/29/2013 09:58 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > HI all, > > I have configured a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 as a NFSv4 server and I am > suffering errors like this: > > perl[7889]: segfault at a80 ip 7fb870227ea2 sp 7fff2fecda30 > error 4 in libperl.so[7fb870193000+162000] > > The symptoms are the

Re: [CentOS] Is this a NFSv4 bug??

2013-01-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/29/2013 10:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/29/2013 09:58 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> HI all, >> >> I have configured a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 as a NFSv4 server and I am >> suffering errors like this: >> >> perl[7889]: segfault at a80 ip 7fb870227ea2 sp 7fff2fecda30 >> error 4 in lib

Re: [CentOS] yum killed, ipa\* and xorg\* a mess

2013-01-29 Thread Zube
On Mon Jan 28 08:20:55 AM, Zube wrote: Follow-up, for the archives: > yum update was killed at an inopportune time, leaving ipa\* and xorg\* > in an inconsistent state. > > yum-complete-transaction looks like it it's going to erase the entire > system and then fails. > > >From the transactio

Re: [CentOS] Anything Like Solaris' Live Upgrade?

2013-01-29 Thread Tim Evans
On 01/28/2013 07:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/28/2013 06:54 PM, Tim Evans wrote: >> It creates one or more "alternate boot environment(s)," then newfs's it, > > This is redundant on CentOS > >> mounts it, copies the running system to it, then applies >> upgrades/patches to it. It does not

Re: [CentOS] yum killed, ipa\* and xorg\* a mess

2013-01-29 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Zube wrote: >> Lessons: > > 1) yum-complete-transaction is not a silver bullet. > > 2) Don't order the Kill Yum Special at the Derhay Cafe. And as an extra warning, note that this is likely to happen if the updates being installed include freenx or nx and you sta

Re: [CentOS] Anything Like Solaris' Live Upgrade?

2013-01-29 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 29.01.2013 um 20:03 schrieb Tim Evans : > > Thanks to everyone for their replies. I suppose it's not possible in > this forum to ask such a question and not get into religion. Kinda like > the U.S. Congress. > > No one has yet shown how a byte-for-byte, fully redundant, bootable > disk(se

[CentOS] intel_iommu=on => No root device found

2013-01-29 Thread Nils Caspar
Hi all, for some reaseon, my message wasn't published. Second try, this time without the giant attachment. I have an Intel server (SR2600URBRPR) in front of me. The disks in my server are connected via PCI card (Adaptec RAID 3405). Now I would like to passthrough a PCI-E graphics card to a KVM

[CentOS] Alias for sending email messages from root

2013-01-29 Thread James B. Byrne
I have run into what can only be described as a farce but one that is outside my control and which I need fixed. I am informed that my cell phone service provider, Bell Canada, will not allow any email messages from a user id 'root' to pass through their email to sms text gateway. Now, I send ale

Re: [CentOS] Alias for sending email messages from root

2013-01-29 Thread Patrick McEvoy
On 01/29/2013 04:03 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > I have run into what can only be described as a farce but one that is > outside my control and which I need fixed. > > I am informed that my cell phone service provider, Bell Canada, will > not allow any email messages from a user id 'root' to pass th

Re: [CentOS] Alias for sending email messages from root

2013-01-29 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:03 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > I have run into what can only be described as a farce but one that is > outside my control and which I need fixed. > > I am informed that my cell phone service provider, Bell Canada, will > not allow any email messages from a user id 'root'

Re: [CentOS] Anything Like Solaris' Live Upgrade?

2013-01-29 Thread Warren Young
On 1/29/2013 12:03, Tim Evans wrote: > I suppose it's not possible in > this forum to ask such a question and not get into religion. Kinda like > the U.S. Congress. Um. Yes. I know you think you're asking for an additional freedom that you feel CentOS doesn't provide, but what you're really l

[CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

2013-01-29 Thread Min Wang
HI I have a git bare repo on centos 6.3 ( with selinux off) the config is: [core] repositoryformatversion = 0 filemode = true bare = true sharedRepository = all ( or true or group) chmod -R g+rs objects when git pushed the changes from remote ssh . the new file under obj

[CentOS] pid location from clamav on Centos 6.3

2013-01-29 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I was getting nowhere with my clamav permissions problem, so I blew away my test system and did a total rebuild. I am now up to the part right after the install of amavis-new, clamav, clamav-devel, and clamd all from the epel.repo (spamassassin, also installed at the same time comes from the b

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

2013-01-29 Thread Bry8 Star
Sorry, mentioned [pgdg92] twice. Pls ignore/delete the [pgdg92] that has priority 15. Received from Bry8 Star, on 2013-01-28 10:16 AM: > For PostgreSQL, i've done these (shown below) at initial/test > stage: (pls DO NOT follow/copy it, try to understand pattern and > do what fits for your case/n

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

2013-01-29 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 01/30/2013 03:34 AM, Min Wang wrote: > HI > > I have a git bare repo on centos 6.3 ( with selinux off) > > the config is: > [core] > repositoryformatversion = 0 > filemode = true > bare = true > sharedRepository = all ( or true or group) > > > chmod -R g+rs objects > >

Re: [CentOS] yum killed, ipa\* and xorg\* a mess

2013-01-29 Thread SilverTip257
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Zube wrote: > >> Lessons: > > > > 1) yum-complete-transaction is not a silver bullet. > > > > 2) Don't order the Kill Yum Special at the Derhay Cafe. > > And as an extra warning, note that this is likely to

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

2013-01-29 Thread Min Wang
Hi thanks. I had a typo on my previsous emai it was: chmod -R g+rws objects > -r--r--r--. 1 myuser mygroup 156 Jan 29 22:22 > objects/fa/905054c795a3b7e5c244bfc6f3a30a0277c6d0 min On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 01/30/2013 03:34 AM, Min Wang wrote: > > > HI > > >

Re: [CentOS] intel_iommu=on => No root device found

2013-01-29 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/29/2013 01:16 PM, Nils Caspar wrote: > Everything works so far, but when I add intel_iommu=on to the kernel > line of my grub.conf, Dracut gives my a kernel panic while booting. I > added "rdshell" to the command line and extracted the boot messages > via dmesg (http://nilscaspar.ch/centos-dm

Re: [CentOS] Alias for sending email messages from root

2013-01-29 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/29/2013 02:03 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > Is there any way to configure the outgoing address to be something > else? Or do I have to rename the root user to get around this > nonsensical, and utterly useless, restriction imposed by my provider? http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_READM

Re: [CentOS] intel_iommu=on => No root device found

2013-01-29 Thread Nils Caspar
Thank you for your hint. > Boot the system with the IOMMU off and find out what PCI device is at > 05:01.0 using lspci. Assuming that it's not critical, try disabling or > removing that component. I can not see a 05:01.0 using lspci. There is however 05:0e.0, which is the RAID controller (Ada