On 11/1/2013 1:44 μμ, fakessh @ wrote:
> I do not know the only thing I can tell you that laziness is a value in
> the computer
You are partly right.
However, IMHO building dovecot using standard openldap-devel on CentOS 5
means that, even though the final RPM works, it will use *ancient*
open
On 01/11/2013 07:08 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> different versions of the backup
> daily, weekly, monthly
Ah, yes, in that kind of scenario hard links would be useful.
> unchanged files are replaced with hard-links
> the destination files are virtually on the same place
And so then could c
On 12/1/2013 11:09 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> ++ export LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -L/usr/local/openldap/lib64"
Or, more correctly:
export LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -L/usr/local/openldap/lib64 -lldap"
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hello,
I'm using HP homeserver where host system run CentOS 6.3 with KVM
virtualization with SELinux enabled, guests too run the same OS (but
without SELinux, but this does not matter).
Host system installed on mirrors based on sda and sdb physical disks.
sd{c..f} disks attached to KVM guest (who
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:46 AM, ken wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 07:08 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> different versions of the backup
>> daily, weekly, monthly
>
> Ah, yes, in that kind of scenario hard links would be useful.
Backuppc does it by matching the content, so it can pool the duplicate
On 2013-01-12, ken wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 07:08 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> different versions of the backup
>> daily, weekly, monthly
>
> Ah, yes, in that kind of scenario hard links would be useful.
>
>> unchanged files are replaced with hard-links
>> the destination files are virtually o
On 01/12/2013 04:35 AM, Ilyas -- wrote:
> [r...@srv-1.home ~]# cat /var/log/audit/audit.log | grep smartd |
> audit2allow -M smartd_svirt_image
> [r...@srv-1.home ~]# semodule -i smartd_svirt_image.pp
> but it not helped to solve problem.
>
> How I can create permissive rule for selinux in my cas
On 01/08/2013 02:36 PM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
> 1) connect using ssh and stop all services
> 2) swapoff /dev/sdXX
> 3) shred -n5 -z -v /dev/sdX
I assume that all of the disks are to be shredded. Shredding non-system
disks wouldn't be difficult enough to ask about. If you shred a mounted
On 01/08/2013 02:06 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote:
> I need to securely wipe out a disk on a remote machine, but I don't have
> access to that machine.
> Therefore I cannot use the LiveCD+shred (or dd) combination.
If you have enough RAM to hold the live disk, you can boot the whole
thing from grub, pr
On 01/08/2013 05:25 AM, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Then I fell over:
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/bnitz/entry/thanks_for_the_memories
> https://live.gnome.org/MemoryReduction
>
> which seems to imply that the shared libraries of all stuff used by Gnome
> gets measured in one of the gnome programs, frequ
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 02:06 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote:
>> I need to securely wipe out a disk on a remote machine, but I don't have
>> access to that machine.
>> Therefore I cannot use the LiveCD+shred (or dd) combination.
>
> If you have enough RAM to
On 01/08/2013 05:30 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I know that I would have to take this to bugzilla if my reading was
> correct. And on further review, I am holding more that way. So I will
> put in the bug report even without being a paying customer. Just my cred
> on working on PKIX back a decade
On 01/12/2013 04:33 PM, zGreenfelder wrote:
> at $long_ago_job we'd use a pxe-netboot image; effectively DBAN
> (http://www.dban.org/). which only really works if you have another
> server in the remote location to act as the pxe server.
Anything that you can PXE boot, you should also be able to
On 01/11/2013 06:55 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
I use the Soekris 6501 fairly extensively. It's available in a much
smaller than 1U case, or 1U if you pr
On 01/12/2013 04:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Usually if no service is running "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/your-sysdisk"
> does crash more or less very late and if you destory the datadisks before
> there is nearly zero chance to recover any data
If I care enough to wipe the disks in a server, "usua
Hi,
Short version: If I had a CPU with the aes-ni [1] feature would luks use it?
I know that Upstream Vendors Security Guide [2] says:
...snip
The default cipher used for LUKS (refer to cryptsetup --help) is
aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 (ESSIV - Encrypted Salt-Sector Initialization
Vector). Note that the
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Keith Keller <
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> On 2013-01-12, SilverTip257 wrote:
> > You mentioned about it running with other people changing files ... it
> > works ok for me. I have gigabytes of backups that get rsynced in the
> early
> > to late
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 04:33 PM, zGreenfelder wrote:
> > at $long_ago_job we'd use a pxe-netboot image; effectively DBAN
> > (http://www.dban.org/). which only really works if you have another
> > server in the remote location to act as the pxe se
19 matches
Mail list logo
