On 2013-01-09 19:41, fred smith wrote:
> here's the (I think) equivalent blocks from my system:
>
> 08048000-0805b000 r-xp fd:00 4685290/usr/libexec/clock-applet
> Size:76 kB
> Rss: 68 kB
> Shared_Clean: 0 kB
> Shared_Dirty: 0 kB
> Priv
Hi,
another user on different mailing list pointed out openssl 1.0.1c
from fedora 18 will work on centos 6.3, and also warned on replacing
core components, and i also know as well, various other component
starts to fail/stop working, like openssh, etc, if not properly
pre-configured after a upgrade
James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Connie Sieh wrote:
> |
> | > On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> | >
> | >> Hi all.
> | >>
> | >> So.. as the problem with the video driver and CentOS 5 seems to be
> | >> hard
> | >> to solve, I'll try to migr
> ./firefox: symbol lookup error: ./libstdc++.so.6: undefined symbol:
> _ZNSt7num_getIcSt19istreambuf_iteratorIcSt11char_traitsIcEEE2idE, version
> GLIBCXX_3.4
>
> and dunno either what I've done wrong, or what other things need to be
> brought over.
>
> Clues appreciated. :)
Haven't quite
Hi,
on CentOS 6.3 (32-bit) current & default GnuTLS is version
2.8.5-4.el6_2.2 gnutls.i686
( where can i get a src rpm for at-least trying it from a
2nd/different directory ? )
Can someone kindly point to an article that will help to effectively
upgrade to GnuTLS v3.1.1 or later+stable version, o
On 10.01.2013 10:41, Bry8 Star wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> on CentOS 6.3 (32-bit) current & default GnuTLS is version
> 2.8.5-4.el6_2.2 gnutls.i686
This is correct!
> ( where can i get a src rpm for at-least trying it from a
> 2nd/different directory ? )
yumdownloader --source gnutls
will download the src.
From: fred smith
> Has anyone managed to get FF 18.0 to work on Centos 5.8?
> I've been hacking at it, placing a stack of .so files (from Centos 6)
> into a private directory, then using LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point the system to
> (in a shellscript that subsequently invokes ff 18) but so far I've n
From: Yungwei Chen
> I found some articles (like https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75152)
> on
> the Internet saying that the default journal mode is writeback. Is that
> correct?
> And is the journal mode of the following device writeback too? Thanks.
mount man page says:
data={jo
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:29:02AM -0800, John Doe wrote:
> From: fred smith
>
> > Has anyone managed to get FF 18.0 to work on Centos 5.8?
> > I've been hacking at it, placing a stack of .so files (from Centos 6)
> > into a private directory, then using LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point the system to
>
On 01/10/2013 07:16 AM, fred smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:29:02AM -0800, John Doe wrote:
>> From: fred smith
>>
>>> Has anyone managed to get FF 18.0 to work on Centos 5.8?
>>> I've been hacking at it, placing a stack of .so files (from Centos 6)
>>> into a private directory, then usi
On 01/10/2013 07:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 07:16 AM, fred smith wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:29:02AM -0800, John Doe wrote:
>>> From: fred smith
>>>
Has anyone managed to get FF 18.0 to work on Centos 5.8?
I've been hacking at it, placing a stack of .so files (f
On 01/10/2013 02:39 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> You guys do know that we are fairly up2date with firefox/thunderbird on
> >their ESR program right?
> >
> >The Firefox/Thunderbird we have is totally updated for security and gets
> >upstream support from Mozilla. It does not have every feature, but i
On 01/10/2013 07:47 AM, Theo Band wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 02:39 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> You guys do know that we are fairly up2date with firefox/thunderbird on
>>> their ESR program right?
>>>
>>> The Firefox/Thunderbird we have is totally updated for security and gets
>>> upstream support from
> Does the version bundled with Centos6 also track this schedule? It's
> currently 10.0.12 which made me decide to remove it from all desktop
> installations and install the newest on the fileserver. It's a bit of a
> hassle to do start though (the nice menu entries get lost as well).
>
>
10.0.12es
On 10 January 2013 14:01, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> Does the version bundled with Centos6 also track this schedule? It's
>> currently 10.0.12 which made me decide to remove it from all desktop
>> installations and install the newest on the fileserver. It's a bit of a
>> hassle to do start though (
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Paul Bijnens
wrote:
>
> That would then verify the claim that the leak is not real (the above shows
> the contrary,
> I think), and gnome programs interact with each other in much more deeper
> ways than
> you would expect.
I sort-of remember once having evoluti
From: Johnny Hughes
> You guys do know that we are fairly up2date with firefox/thunderbird on
> their ESR program right?
> The Firefox/Thunderbird we have is totally updated for security and gets
> upstream support from Mozilla. It does not have every feature, but it
> has most and should stay o
On 01/10/2013 10:32 AM, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>> >Yes we are. On Quadro and enthusiast class equipment. CentOS 5 works
>> >fine, but we haven't done any sufficient CentOS 6 testing because other
>> >software vendors in Engineering are still not certified for the platform.
>> >What kind of pr
On 01/10/2013 08:16 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Johnny Hughes
>
>> You guys do know that we are fairly up2date with firefox/thunderbird on
>> their ESR program right?
>> The Firefox/Thunderbird we have is totally updated for security and gets
>> upstream support from Mozilla. It does not have eve
Sorry for not having the replies, but I'd already turned on Digest mode
for the list.
To Joseph and John:
Concerning the odd choice for a server. I don't usually pick the servers
here since we sort of have a guy that does all of the ordering for us.
He typically does a good job. I do scan the
Theo Band wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 10:32 AM, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Yes we are. On Quadro and enthusiast class equipment. CentOS 5 works
fine, but we haven't done any sufficient CentOS 6 testing because other
software vendors in Engineering are still not certified for the platform.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 08:10:43AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Paul Bijnens
> wrote:
> >
> > That would then verify the claim that the leak is not real (the above shows
> > the contrary,
> > I think), and gnome programs interact with each other in much more deepe
On 2013-01-10 15:10, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Paul Bijnens
> wrote:
>>
>> That would then verify the claim that the leak is not real (the above shows
>> the contrary,
>> I think), and gnome programs interact with each other in much more deeper
>> ways than
>> yo
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Paul Bijnens
wrote:
>
> I do have the Lightning plugin in Thunderbird, just to be able to read
> nice formatted invites to meetings etc. And that thing marks items in my
> calendar.
If you have notifications set, does the clock-applet pop them up?
> And I do re
On 2013-01-10 19:13, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Paul Bijnens
> wrote:
>>
>> I do have the Lightning plugin in Thunderbird, just to be able to read
>> nice formatted invites to meetings etc. And that thing marks items in my
>> calendar.
>
> If you have notifications
On 01/04/2013 11:53 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
>>
>> there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
>> 6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
>>
>> Is this the 'correct' th
On 01/10/2013 03:10 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 11:53 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
>>>
>>> there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
>>> 6.3, but to get the more curren
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to compile a document to send out to our customers that outlines
the minimum and recommended requirements to run C4, C5, and C6.
Does anyone know the particulars? When we order systems, it's usually
Pentium Dual Core CPU, 120GB+ Hard drive, 2GB Ram.
I need the A
On 01/10/2013 03:24 PM, Andrew S Reis wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I'm trying to compile a document to send out to our customers that outlines
> the minimum and recommended requirements to run C4, C5, and C6.
>
>
>
> Does anyone know the particulars? When we order systems, it's usually
> Pent
2013/1/10 Andrew S Reis :
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I'm trying to compile a document to send out to our customers that outlines
> the minimum and recommended requirements to run C4, C5, and C6.
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/unix/linux/install_RHEL6.html#requirements
--
Eero
___
>
> I need the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM requirements to install and run any of the
> aforementioned flavors as a "basic server".
>
Define "basic server" ... This varies by person and task tho the point it's
meaningless without further clarification.
Although you can install on the bare minimum in the doc
The solution was unexpected. See below.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I migrated our internal wiki server last week, and some IE users
aren't able to authenticate.
The service is hosted by Apache using Digest authentication. It
migrated from Apache 2.2.9 (Debian 5) to Apache 2.2.
Ich werde ab 11.01.2013 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
21.01.2013.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Any idea what causes this on boot?
You need to implement a remote task_setrlimit in your security module
and call it directly from this functionWARNING: at
security/security.c:51 security_ops_task_setrlimit()
Call Trace:
[] security_ops_task_setrlimit+0x87/0x96
[] do_prlimit+0xd7/0x1d2
[] sys_
(pls see message in between previous, below)
From Ibrahim Yurtseven, received on 2013-01-10 9:39 AM:
> On 10.01.2013 10:41, Bry8 Star wrote:
>> Hi,
> Hi
>
Thanks.
>
>> on CentOS 6.3 (32-bit) current & default GnuTLS is version
>> 2.8.5-4.el6_2.2 gnutls.i686
> This is correct!
>
>> ( where can
35 matches
Mail list logo
