Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

2012-11-30 Thread Sorin Srbu (IMAP)
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johan Scheepers > Sent: den 30 november 2012 07:59 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection > > >> Installed Centos 6.3 live-cd. Looking

Re: [CentOS] who's in charge of the fortune d/b?

2012-11-30 Thread Michael Simpson
> Then there's the skin I read about a decade ago, with a sysadmin skin of > Doom (use the shotgun on that hung process) > > mark > That would be psDoom http://psdoom.sourceforge.net/ The more resources a process used the bigger the monster was that represented it mike

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 93, Issue 16

2012-11-30 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

[CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread Tony Molloy
Hi, I've just been checking my local copy of the CentOS repos. I found 200+ i386/i686 packages in both the updates/5/RPMS and updates/6/Packages directories. I checked with my rsync site ( ftp.heanet.ie ) and the equivalent UK site ( ftp.mirrorservice.org ) and they both carried these pack

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just been checking my local copy of the CentOS repos. I found > 200+ i386/i686 packages in both the updates/5/RPMS and > updates/6/Packages directories. > > I checked with my rsync site ( ftp.heanet.ie ) and the equivalent UK > site ( ftp.mirrorservice.org ) a

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread John Doe
From: Tony Molloy > Is this a case a repo pollution, it can't be necessary to have i386 > packages in the x86_64 updates. Just checking before I delete these > packages. You need them to run i386 apps on a x86_64. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@c

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread Tony Molloy
On Friday 30 November 2012 14:21:12 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've just been checking my local copy of the CentOS repos. I > > found 200+ i386/i686 packages in both the updates/5/RPMS and > > updates/6/Packages directories. > > > > I checked with my rsync sit

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread Mike Burger
> From: Tony Molloy > >> Is this a case a repo pollution, it can't be necessary to have i386 >> packages in the x86_64 updates. Just checking before I delete these >> packages. > > You need them to run i386 apps on a x86_64. > > JD True, but i386/i686 packages are usually still only located in t

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/30/2012 09:13 AM, Mike Burger wrote: >> From: Tony Molloy >> >>> Is this a case a repo pollution, it can't be necessary to have i386 >>> packages in the x86_64 updates. Just checking before I delete these >>> packages. >> You need them to run i386 apps on a x86_64. >> >> JD > True, but i386/

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Mike Burger wrote on Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:13:10 -0500 (EST): > True, but i386/i686 packages are usually still only located in the 32bit > repo directories...they're not usually intermingled in the actual download > directories, last I checked. How many dozens of years did you "last check"? ;-) rep

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

2012-11-30 Thread Mike Burger
> On 11/30/2012 09:13 AM, Mike Burger wrote: >>> From: Tony Molloy >>> Is this a case a repo pollution, it can't be necessary to have i386 packages in the x86_64 updates. Just checking before I delete these packages. >>> You need them to run i386 apps on a x86_64. >>> >>> JD >> True

[CentOS] opennx wants to replace nxclient on all my CentOS 6 servers

2012-11-30 Thread Greg Bailey
Looks like opennx appeared in the extras repository some time recently. Because the extras repository is enabled by default, all of the servers where I have nxclient installed are showing opennx as available which will obsolete nxclient. I went ahead and upgraded on my laptop but the resulting

Re: [CentOS] opennx wants to replace nxclient on all my CentOS 6 servers

2012-11-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Greg Bailey wrote: > Looks like opennx appeared in the extras repository some time recently. > Because the extras repository is enabled by default, all of the servers > where I have nxclient installed are showing opennx as available which > will obsolete nxclient. > > I

Re: [CentOS] opennx wants to replace nxclient on all my CentOS 6 servers

2012-11-30 Thread Greg Bailey
On 11/30/2012 09:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Greg Bailey wrote: >> Looks like opennx appeared in the extras repository some time recently. >> Because the extras repository is enabled by default, all of the servers >> where I have nxclient installed are showing opennx as av

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

2012-11-30 Thread Johan Scheepers
On 30/11/2012 10:52, Sorin Srbu (IMAP) wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Johan Scheepers >> Sent: den 30 november 2012 07:59 >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet conn

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

2012-11-30 Thread Earl A Ramirez
On 1 December 2012 02:09, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 30/11/2012 10:52, Sorin Srbu (IMAP) wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > >> Behalf Of Johan Scheepers > >> Sent: den 30 november 2012 07:59 > >> To: centos@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] opennx wants to replace nxclient on all my CentOS 6 servers

2012-11-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/30/2012 10:32 AM, Greg Bailey wrote: > On 11/30/2012 09:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Greg Bailey wrote: >>> Looks like opennx appeared in the extras repository some time recently. >>> Because the extras repository is enabled by default, all of the servers >>> where I

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

2012-11-30 Thread Johan Scheepers
On 30/11/2012 20:38, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > On 1 December 2012 02:09, Johan Scheepers wrote: > >> On 30/11/2012 10:52, Sorin Srbu (IMAP) wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johan Scheepers Sent: den

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

2012-11-30 Thread Earl A Ramirez
On 1 December 2012 03:05, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 30/11/2012 20:38, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > > On 1 December 2012 02:09, Johan Scheepers > wrote: > > > >> On 30/11/2012 10:52, Sorin Srbu (IMAP) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

2012-11-30 Thread Sorin Srbu
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johan Scheepers > Sent: den 30 november 2012 19:09 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection > > I am a pensionar and have lots of time.

[CentOS] libreoffice

2012-11-30 Thread m . roth
CentOS 6.3, libreoffice-core-3.4.5.2-16.1.el6_3.x86_64, running kde I had a couple of documents up. From a terminal window, I ran soffice to look at a document I'd just received in an email*. Looked at it. Killed the soffice session... and the other docs closed, and libreoffice shut down. Anyone e

Re: [CentOS] libreoffice

2012-11-30 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > CentOS 6.3, libreoffice-core-3.4.5.2-16.1.el6_3.x86_64, running kde > > I had a couple of documents up. From a terminal window, I ran soffice to > look at a document I'd just received in an email*. Looked at it. Killed > the soffice session... and the